Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of race on outcomes in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Racial disparities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been reported but the relative contribution of disease versus patient-specific factors including comorbidities and access to care is unclear.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in a racially diverse patient cohort controlling for cytogenetic risk group. Patients were classified into four groups: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic and Other.

Results

We evaluated 106 patients from 84 zipcodes incorporating demographics, clinicopathologic features, treatment patterns and outcomes. We identified significant differences in BMI and geographic poverty based on ethnoracial group, while prognostic mutations in NPM1 and FLT3 did not differ significantly. Utilization of intensive chemotherapy and transplant rate did not differ by ethnoracial group. However, there was a significantly higher use of alternate donor transplants in minority populations. There was a notably increased rate of clinical trial enrollment in NHW patients compared to other groups. In log-rank analysis, NHW patients had increased overall survival (OS) compared to NHB, Hispanic and Other patients (31.6 months vs. 16.7 months vs. 14.3 months, vs 18.1 months, p = 0.021). In bivariate analysis, overall survival was negatively influenced by advanced age and race. Obesity and zip code poverty levels approached statistical significance in predicting OS. In multivariate analysis, the only factors independently influencing OS were race and allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Conclusion

These results suggest that race impacts survival in intermediate-risk AML, highlighting the need to dissect biologic and nonbiologic factors that contribute to this disparity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. De Santis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL (2019) Cancer statistics for African American. CA 69(3):211–233

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bang S-M, Ahn JY, Park J et al (2008) Low frequency and variability of FLT3 mutations in Korean patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Korean Med Sci 23(5):833–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sekeres MA, Peterson B, Dodge RK et al (2004) Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes in African Americans and whites with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 103(11):4036–4042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Darbinyan K, Shastri A, Budhathoki A et al (2017) Hispanic ethnicity is associated with younger age at presentation but worse survival in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 1(24):2120–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei H, Wang Y, Zhou C et al (2018) Distinct genetic alteration profiles of acute myeloid leukemia between Caucasian and Eastern Asian population. J Hematol Oncol 11(1):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Polite BN, Adams-Campbell LL, Brawley OW et al (2017) Charting the future of cancer health disparities research: a position statement from the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 35(26):3075–3082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel MI, Ma Y, Mitchell BS, Rhoads KF (2012) Understanding disparities in leukemia: a national study. Cancer Causes Control 23(11):1831–1837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L et al (2016) Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 374(23):2209–2221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrd JC, Mrózek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC, Pettenati MJ, Patil SR, Rao KW, Watson MS, Koduru PR, Moore JO, Stone RM, Mayer RJ, Feldman EJ, Davey FR, Schiffer CA, Larson RA, Bloomfield CD, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461) (2002) Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 100(13):4325–4336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel JP, Gönen M, Figueroa ME et al (2012) Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 366(12):1079–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ et al (2003) Revised recommendations of the international working group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4642–4649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Master S, Mansour R, Devarakonda SS, Shi Z, Mills G, Shi R (2016) Predictors of survival in acute myeloid leukemia by treatment modality. Anticancer Res 36(4):1719–1727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Do DP, Zheng C (2017) A marginal structural modeling strategy investigating short and long-term exposure to neighborhood poverty on BMI among U.S. black and white adults. Health Place 46:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elfassy T, Glymour MM, Kershaw KN et al (2017) Association between sustained poverty and changes in body mass index, 1990–2015: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Am J Epidemiol 187(6):1240–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Master S, Munker R, Shi Z, Mills G, Shi R (2016) Insurance status and other non-biological factors predict outcomes in acute myelogenous leukemia: analysis of Data from the National Cancer Database. Anticancer Res 36(9):4915–4921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Döhner K, Schlenk RF, Habdank M et al (2005) Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations. Blood 106(12):3740–3746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiede C, Koch S, Creutzig E et al (2006) Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 107(10):4011–4020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Venditti A, Piciocchi A, Candoni A et al (2019) GIMEMA AML1310 trial of risk-adapted, MRD-directed therapy for young adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 134(12):935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciurea SO, Zhang MJ, Bacigalupo AA et al (2015) Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 126(8):1033–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCurdy SR, Kasamon YL, Kanakry CG et al (2017) Comparable composite endpoints after HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Haematologica 102(2):391–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrne MM, Halman LJ, Koniaris LG, Cassileth PA, Rosenblatt JD, Cheung MC (2011) Effects of poverty and race on outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Clin Oncol 34(3):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatt VR, Shostrom V, Gundabolu K, Armitage JO (2018) Utilization of initial chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in the United States. Blood Adv 2(11):1277–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Winestone LE, Getz KD, Rao P et al (2019) Disparities in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) clinical trial enrollment. Leuk Lymphoma 60(9):2190–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY et al (2008) Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer 112(2):228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Statler A, Hobbs B, Radivoyevitch T et al (2019) The impact of comorbidities and organ dysfunction commonly used for clinical trial eligibility criteria on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving induction chemotherapy. Blood 134:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhatnagar B et al (2021) Poor survival and differential impact of genetic features of black patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov 11:626–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pulte D, Redaniel MT, Jansen L, Brenner H, Jeffreys M (2013) Recent trends in survival of adult patients with acute leukemia: overall improvements, but persistent and partly increasing disparity in survival of patients from minority groups. Haematologica 98(2):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Utuama O, Mukhtar F, Pham YT-H et al (2019) Racial/ethnic, age and sex disparities in leukemia survival among adults in the United States during 1973–2014 period. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0220864–e0220864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

University of Illinois at Chicago Cancer Center Pilot Grant awarded to Dr. Irum Kha.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irum Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, I.E., Patel, A.A., Wang, H. et al. Impact of race on outcomes in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Causes Control 32, 705–712 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01422-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01422-4

Keywords

Navigation