Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

US urban–rural disparities in breast cancer-screening practices at the national, regional, and state level, 2012–2016

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies suggesting that rural US women may be less likely to have a recent mammogram than urban women are limited in either scope or granularity. This study explored urban–rural disparities in US breast cancer-screening practices at the national, regional, and state levels.

Methods

We used data from the 2012, 2014, and 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Systems surveys. Logistic models were utilized to examine the impact of living in an urban/rural area on mammogram screening at three geographic levels while adjusting for covariates. We then calculated average adjusted predictions (AAPs) and average marginal effects (AMEs) to isolate the association between breast cancer screening and the urban/rural factor.

Results

At all geographic levels, AAPs of breast cancer screening were similar among urban, suburban, and rural residents. Regarding “ever having a mammogram” and “having a recent mammogram,” urban women had small but significantly higher adjusted probabilities (AAP: 94.6%, 81.1%) compared to rural women (AAP: 93.5%, 80.2%).

Conclusions

While urban–rural differences in breast cancer screening are small, they can translate into tens of thousands of rural women not receiving mammograms. Hence, there is a need to continue screening initiatives in these areas to reduce the number of breast cancer deaths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2019) Cancer facts & figures 2018. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2018.html

  2. National Cancer Institute (2019) Breast cancer—patient version. https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA 68(1):7–30

  4. American Cancer Society (2018) Estimated number of deaths for the four major cancers by sex and age group, 2018. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2018/estimated-number-of-deaths-for-the-four-major-cancers-by-sex-and-age-group-2018.pdf

  5. American Cancer Society (2019) Survival rates for breast cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/understanding-a-breast-cancer-diagnosis/breast-cancer-survival-rates.html

  6. American Cancer Society (2017) Limitations of Mammograms. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/mammograms/limitations-of-mammograms.html.

  7. American Cancer Society (2018) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. https://www.cancer.org/healthy/find-cancer-early/cancer-screening-guidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer.html

  8. Drukteinis JS, Mooney BP, Flowers CI, Gatenby RA (2013) Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med 126(6):472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Orwat J, Caputo N, Key W, De Sa J (2017) Comparing rural and urban cervical and breast cancer screening rates in a privately insured population. Social Work Public Health 32(5):311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2017.1289872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heller SL, Rosenkrantz AB, Gao Y, Moy L (2018) County-level factors predicting low uptake of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 211(3):624–629. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.19541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang P, Too G, Irwin KL (2000) Utilization of preventive medical services in the United States: a comparison between rural and urban populations. J Rural Health 16(4):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2000.tb00485.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stanley E, Lewis MC, Irshad A, Ackerman S, Collins H, Pavic D, Leddy RJ (2017) Effectiveness of a mobile mammography program. Am J Roentgenol 209(6):1426–1429. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkowitz Z, Zhang X, Richards TB, Sabatino SA, Peipins LA, Holt J (2014) White MC (2019) Multilevel regression for small-area estimation of mammography use in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 28(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-18-0367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doescher MP, Jackson JE (2009) Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 15(3):200–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181a117da

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peppercorn JM, Houck K, Wogu AF, Villagra V, Lyman GH, Wheeler SB (2013) National survey of breast cancer screening in rural America. J Clin Oncol 31(26_suppl):13–13. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.26_suppl.13

  16. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ (2002) Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer 94(11):2801–2812. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engelman KK, Hawley DB, Gazaway R, Mosier MC, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF (2002) Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(1):62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Henry KA, McDonald K, Sherman R, Kinney AY, Stroup AM (2014) Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. J Women's Health 23(8):664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vang S, Margolies LR, Jandorf L (2018) Mobile mammography participation among medically underserved women: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 15:E140. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Coughlin SS, King J (2010) Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006. BMC Public Health 10(1):146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nuño T, Gerald JK, Harris R, Martinez ME, Estrada A, García F (2012) Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States. Cancer Causes Control 23(8):1333–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2012 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2012/pdf/CODEBOOK12_LLCP.pdf

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2014 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2014/pdf/CODEBOOK14_LLCP.pdf

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system overview: BRFSS 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2016/pdf/overview_2016.pdf

  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) BRFSS questionnaires. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/index.htm

  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Overview: BRFSS 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2011/overview_11.pdf

  27. North Dakota Department of Health (2017) Methodology. https://www.ndhealth.gov/brfss/?id=57

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Breast cancer screening guidelines for women. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/pdf/breastcancerscreeningguidelines.pdf

  29. Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services (2015) Interpreting and reporting BRFSS data. https://dphhs.mt.gov/Portals/85/publichealth/documents/BRFSS/Factors/2015Factors2.pdf

  30. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (2012) Technical Notes 2012. https://schs.dph.ncdhhs.gov/data/brfss/2012/technical.htm.

  31. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (2018) Complete health indicator report of mental health—frequent mental distress—adults (18+). https://ibis.dhss.alaska.gov/indicator/complete_profile/FMD.html

  32. Harding C, Pompei F, Burmistrov D, Welch HG, Abebe R, Wilson R (2015) Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality across US counties. JAMA Inter Med 175(9):1483–1489. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verdial FC, Etzioni R, Duggan C, Anderson BO (2017) Demographic changes in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and age associated with population-based mammographic screening. J Surg Oncol 115(5):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rauscher GH, Allgood KL, Whitman S (2002) Conant E (2012) Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance. J Women's Health 21(2):154–160. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ayanian JZ, Landon BE, Zaslavsky AM, Newhouse JP (2013) Racial and ethnic differences in use of mammography between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(24):1891–1896. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Richardson LC, Henley SJ, Miller JW, Massetti G, Thomas CC (2016) Patterns and trends in age-specific black-white differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality - United States, 1999–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(40):1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6540a1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunningham JE, Walters CA, Hill EG, Ford ME, Barker-Elamin T, Bennett CL (2013) Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(2):589–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2305-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martinez ME, Unkart JT, Tao L, Kroenke CH, Schwab R, Komenaka I, Gomez SL (2017) Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: a population-based study. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0175515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Parise C, Caggiano V (2018) The influence of marital status and race/ethnicity on risk of mortality for triple negative breast cancer. PLoS ONE 13(4):e0196134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hanske J, Meyer CP, Sammon JD, Choueiri TK, Menon M, Lipsitz SR, Noldus J, Nguyen PL, Sun M, Trinh QD (2016) The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 89:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Agarwal S, Ying J, Boucher KM, Agarwal JP (2017) The association between socioeconomic factors and breast cancer-specific survival varies by race. PLoS ONE 12(12):e0187018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status–35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54(39):981

    Google Scholar 

  43. Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, Anderson R, Cokkinides VE, Murray T, Henley J, Liff J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(18):1384–1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mouw T, Koster A, Wright ME, Blank MM, Moore SC, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A (2008) Education and risk of cancer in a large cohort of men and women in the United States. PLoS ONE 3(11):e3639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenberg L, Wise LA, Palmer JR, Horton NJ, Adams-Campbell LL (2005) A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark 14(11):2628–2633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdelsattar ZM, Hendren S, Wong SL (2017) The impact of health insurance on cancer care in disadvantaged communities. Cancer 123(7):1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bitler MP, Carpenter CS (2016) Health insurance mandates, mammography, and breast cancer diagnoses. Am Econ J Econ Policy 8(3):39–68. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20120298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Niu X, Roche LM, Pawlish KS, Henry KA (2013) Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status. Cancer Med 2(3):403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2013 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2013/pdf/CODEBOOK13_LLCP.pdf

  50. SAS Institute Inc (2017) SAS 9.4. Cary, North Carolina

  51. Jann B (2013) Predictive margins and marginal effects in Stata

  52. Williams R (2012) Using Stata’s margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J 12(2):308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. StataCorp, (2017) Stata statistical software: release 15. StataCorp LLC, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  54. U.S. Census Bureau (2015 ) Census Bureau Regions and Divisions with State FIPS Codes. https://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/maps-data/maps/reg_div.txt

  55. Koehler E, Brown E, Haneuse SJPA (2009) On the assessment of Monte Carlo error in simulation-based statistical analyses. Am Stat 63(2):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Farrance I, Frenkel R (2014) Uncertainty in measurement: a review of monte carlo simulation using microsoft excel for the calculation of uncertainties through functional relationships, including uncertainties in empirically derived constants. Clin Biochem Rev 35(1):37–61

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. US Census Bureau (2018) QuickFacts Illinois, US. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/il,US/PST045218

  58. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) United states cancer statistics: data visualizations. https://gis.cdc.gov/Cancer/USCS/DataViz.html

  59. Bowlin SJ, Morrill BD, Nafziger AN, Jenkins PL, Lewis C, Pearson TA (1993) Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: the behavioral risk factor survey. J Clin Epidemiol 46(6):561–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Klompas M, Cocoros NM, Menchaca JT, Erani D, Hafer E, Herrick B, Josephson M, Lee M, Payne Weiss MD, Zambarano B, Eberhardt KR, Malenfant J, Nasuti L, Land T (2017) State and local chronic disease surveillance using electronic health record systems. Am J Public Health 107(9):1406–1412. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.303874

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Schneider KL, Clark MA, Rakowski W, Lapane KL (2012) Evaluating the impact of non-response bias in the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). J Epidemiol Community Health 66(4):290–295. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.103861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Lam Tran

  2. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Phoebe Tran

Authors
  1. Lam Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phoebe Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lam Tran.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, L., Tran, P. US urban–rural disparities in breast cancer-screening practices at the national, regional, and state level, 2012–2016. Cancer Causes Control 30, 1045–1055 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01217-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation