Abstract
Purpose
Persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary cause of anal cancer, a disease that disproportionately affects men who have sex with men (MSM); however, there is no uniform screening protocol to detect anal cancer. This qualitative study explores whether a self-anal exam (SAE) or partner anal exam (PAE), that includes self-palpation or palpation of a partner’s anal canal, is an acceptable and self-efficacious screening test, which will cue appropriate follow-up care in MSM.
Methods
Twenty-four MSM living in Houston took part in four focus group sessions eliciting their responses to a study teaching them to perform an SAE or PAE (SAE/PAE). Participants were asked about the acceptability and feasibility of executing an SAE/PAE routinely. Thematic analysis of session transcripts was used to identify common patterns in participant responses. Results: Overall, participants expressed self-efficacy for performing an SAE/PAE and voiced a preference for being taught the procedure by a clinician. Participants agreed that they would consult with a clinician if they ever discovered an abnormality while performing an SAE/PAE. A lack of knowledge about anal cancer among MSM may present a barrier to adopting SAE/PAE. In discussing their experience of the exams, some participants suggested that it could become a routine practice for them.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that SAE and PAE, as a screen for anal cancer, are acceptable and feasible to MSM. Future research should explore attitudes and beliefs of MSM, with the aim of improving anal cancer education and understanding of pathologic findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts and figures 2015. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Chaturvedi AK (2010) Beyond cervical cancer: burden of other HPV-related cancers among men and women. J Adol Health 46:S20–S26
Nelson RA et al (2013) Changing patterns of anal canal carcinoma in the United States. J Clin Oncol 31:1569–1575
Johnson LG et al (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101(2):281–288
American Cancer Society (2013) Cancer facts and figures 2013. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
D’Souza G et al (2008) Incidence and epidemiology of anal cancer in the multicenter AIDS cohort study (MACS). J Acquir Immune Defic Synd 48(4):491–499
Daling JR et al (1982) Correlates of homosexual behavior and the incidence of anal cancer. J Am Med Assoc 247(14):1988–1990
Diamond C et al (2005) Increased incidence of squamous cell anal cancer among men with AIDS in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Sexually Transmitted Dis 32(5):314
De Vuyst H et al (2009) Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 124(7):1626–1636
Nyitray AG et al (2016) Incidence, duration, persistence, and factors associated with high-risk anal HPV persistence among HIV-negative men having sex with men: a multi-national study. Clin Infect Dis 32:314–320
National Cancer Institute. SEER stat fact sheets: anal cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/anus.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2016
Markowitz LE et al (2014) Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP), in morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta
Sachez DM et al (2012) Knowledge of human papillomavirus and anal cancer among men who have sex with men attending a New York City sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Int J STD AIDS 23(1):41–43
Nielsen A et al (2009) Awareness of human papillomavirus in 23 000 Danish men from the general male population. Eur J Cancer Prev 18(3):236–239
Newman PA et al (2013) HPV vaccine acceptability among men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transmit Infect 89(7):568–574
Wells JS et al (2014) An integrative review of guidelines for anal cancer screening in HIV-infected persons. AIDS Pat Care STDs 28(7):350–357
Simpson S, Turner R (2012) Four decades of anal cancer in Tasmania, Australia: what do the case data tell us? Sex Health 9(3):213–219
Chin-Hong P et al (2008) Comparison of patient- and clinician-collected anal cytology samples to screen for human papillomavirus–associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med 149(5):300–306
Dodge B et al (2012) Rectal self-sampling in non-clinical venues for detection of sexually transmissible infections among behaviourally bisexual men. Sex Health 9(2):190–191
Daniel WJ (2010) Anorectal pain, bleeding and lumps. Aust Fam Physician 39(6):376–381
National Cancer Institute (2015) NCI News Note: Multi-center anal pre-cancer treatment and cancer prevention study launched in HIV-infected persons. http://www.cancer.gov/news-events/press-releases/2015/anchor-trial-launch. Accessed 26 Aug 2016
Newman PA et al (2008) Anal cancer screening: barriers and facilitators among ethnically diverse gay, bisexual, transgender, and other men who have sex with men. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv 20(4):328–353
Darragh TM, Winkler B (2011) Anal cancer and cervical cancer screening: key differences. Cancer Cytopathol 119(1):5–19
Ortholan C et al (2005) Anal canal carcinoma: early-stage tumors ≤10 mm (T1 or Tis): therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(2):479–485
American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) Anus, in AJCC cancer staging handbook. In: Edge SBA (ed) From the AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New York, pp 207–218
Mlakar B (2009) Proctoscopy should be mandatory in men that have sex with men with external anogenital warts. Acta dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica, et Adriatica 18(1):7–11
Nyitray AG, Hicks JT, Hwang L-Y, Baraniuk S, White M, Millas S, Onwuka N, Zhang X, Brown EL, Ross MW, Chiao E (in press) A Phase 2 clinical study to assess the feasibility of self- and partner anal exams to detect anal canal abnormalities including anal cancer. Sex Transm Infect
Ong JJ et al (2016) Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal cancer using regular digital ano-rectal examinations in men who have sex with men living with HIV. J Int AIDS Soc 19(1):20514
QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. 2012, QSR International Pty Ltd.: Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butame, S.A., Lawler, S., Hicks, J.T. et al. A qualitative investigation among men who have sex with men on the acceptability of performing a self- or partner anal exam to screen for anal cancer. Cancer Causes Control 28, 1157–1166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0935-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0935-6