Concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) guidelines for cancer prevention and obesity-related cancer risk in the Framingham Offspring cohort (1991–2008)
This prospective cohort study evaluates associations between healthful behaviors consistent with WCRF/AICR cancer prevention guidelines and obesity-related cancer risk, as a third of cancers are estimated to be preventable.
The study sample consisted of adults from the Framingham Offspring cohort (n = 2,983). From 1991 to 2008, 480 incident doctor-diagnosed obesity-related cancers were identified. Data on diet, measured by a food frequency questionnaire, anthropometric measures, and self-reported physical activity, collected in 1991 was used to construct a 7-component score based on recommendations for body fatness, physical activity, foods that promote weight gain, plant foods, animal foods, alcohol, and food preservation, processing, and preparation. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate associations between the computed score, its components, and subcomponents in relation to obesity-related cancer risk.
The overall score was not associated with obesity-related cancer risk after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, energy, and preexisting conditions (HR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.86–1.02). When score components were evaluated separately, for every unit increment in the alcohol score, there was 29 % lower risk of obesity-related cancers (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.51–0.99) and 49–71 % reduced risk of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Every unit increment in the subcomponent score for non-starchy plant foods (fruits, vegetables, and legumes) among participants who consume starchy vegetables was associated with 66 % reduced risk of colorectal cancer (HR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.22–0.88).
Lower alcohol consumption and a plant-based diet consistent with the cancer prevention guidelines were associated with reduced risk of obesity-related cancers in this population.
KeywordsHealthful behaviors American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer prevention guidelines Cancer Framingham Heart Study
- 1.Silverberg E, Boring C, Squires T (2008) Cancer statistics 1990. CA Cancer J Clin 40(1):9–26Google Scholar
- 3.World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute of Cancer Research, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 4.World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (1997) Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute of Cancer Research, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cerhan JR, Potter JD, Gilmore JM, Janney CA, Kushi LH, Lazovich D et al (2004) Adherence to the AICR cancer prevention recommendations and subsequent morbidity and mortality in the Iowa women’s health study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(7):1114–1120Google Scholar
- 7.Romaguera D, Vergnaud A, Peeters PH, van Gils CH, Chan DS, Ferrari P et al (2012) Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study. Am J Clin Nutr 96(1):150–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Vergnaud A, Romaguera D, Peeters PH, van Gils CH, Chan DS, Romieu I et al (2013) Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: results from the European prospective investigation into nutrition and cancer cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 97(5):1107–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.American Cancer Society (2014) Does body weight affect cancer? http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/dietandphysicalactivity/bodyweightandcancerrisk/body-weight-and-cancer-risk-effects. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
- 16.National Cancer Institute (2014) Obesity and cancer risk. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/obesity. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
- 19.Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, Bingham S et al (2003) A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based observing protein and energy nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 32(6):1054–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar