Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Birth size and survival in breast cancer patients from the Uppsala Birth Cohort Study

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies suggest that larger birth size is associated with a higher breast cancer incidence, but studies on birth measures and mortality in breast cancer cases are scarce. This study investigates survival of women after breast cancer diagnosis (n = 437) in the Uppsala Birth Cohort born in 1915–1929.

Methods

Cox regression was used to analyze mortality from any cause after a breast cancer diagnosis. Birth measures including gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), BW for GA, birth length, and ponderal index (PI) were converted to standard deviation (SD) scores, and all analyses were adjusted for age and calendar time at diagnosis. Analyses were performed with and without adjustment for other birth measures, reproductive history, and adult socioeconomic position.

Results

In fully adjusted analyses, one SD increase in GA was associated with 17 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 6–26 %] lower mortality and one SD increase in BW was associated with 29 % (7–56 %) higher mortality. PI showed a weaker trend in the same direction: hazard ratio = 1.16 (95 % CI 1.03–1.30).

Conclusions

Our results bring in new evidence that both high GA and low BW predict a better survival in breast cancer cases. Further studies need to investigate mediation of these associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BL:

Birth length

BW:

Birth weight

CI:

Confidence interval

GA:

Gestational age

HR:

Hazard ratio

IQR:

Interquartile range

PI:

Ponderal index

SEP:

Socioeconomic position

UBCoS:

Uppsala Birth Cohort Study

References

  1. dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola B, McCormack V (2008) Birth size and breast cancer risk: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 studies. PLoS Med 5:e193. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 360:187–195. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09454-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K et al (2002) Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer—collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 87:1234–1245. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Risnes KR, Vatten LJ, Baker JL et al (2011) Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 40:647–661. doi:10.1093/ije/dyq267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman MP, Rachet B, Woods LM et al (2004) Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer 90:1367–1373. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reeves GK, Patterson J, Vessey MP, Yeates D, Jones L (2000) Hormonal and other factors in relation to survival among breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 89:293–299. doi:10.1002/1097-0215(20000520)89:3<293::AID-IJC13>3.0.CO;2-R

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekbom A, Erlandsson G, Hsieh C, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO, Cnattingius S (2000) Risk of breast cancer in prematurely born women. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:840–841. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.10.840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanderson M, Daling JR, Doody DR, Malone KE (2006) Perinatal factors and mortality from breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1984–1987. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maehle BO, Vatten LJ, Tretli S (2010) Birth length and weight as predictors of breast cancer prognosis. BMC Cancer 10:115. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola BL, Mohsen R, Leon DA, Lithell HO (2003) Fetal growth and subsequent risk of breast cancer: results from long term follow up of Swedish cohort. BMJ 326:248–251. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7383.248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, Koupil I, Leon DA, Lithell HO (2005) Birth characteristics and adult cancer incidence: Swedish cohort of over 11,000 men and women. Int J Cancer 115:611–617. doi:10.1002/ijc.20915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koupil I, Goodman A (2011) Health equity: a life course approach. Public Serv Rev Eur Union 22:382–383

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW et al (2001) A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics 108:E35. doi:10.1542/peds.108.2.e35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sovio U, Dibden A, Koupil I (2012) Social determinants of infant mortality in a historical Swedish cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26:408–420. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01302.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwan ML, Chen WY, Kroenke CH et al (2012) Pre-diagnosis body mass index and survival after breast cancer in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132:729–739. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1914-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lynch CD, Zhang J (2007) The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):86–96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00865.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajaleid K, Manor O, Koupil I (2008) Does the strength of the association between foetal growth rate and ischaemic heart disease mortality differ by social circumstances in early or later life? J Epidemiol Community Health 62:e6. doi:10.1136/jech.2006.059147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dan Altmann for his advice on an earlier data analysis, and Valerie McCormack and Bianca De Stavola for statistical advice. We would also like to thank Anna Goodman for her help with data management. The Uppsala Birth Cohort Multigenerational Study is supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (2006-7498 PI Ilona Koupil) and from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2007-1010 PI Ilona Koupil). IK is funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulla Sovio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sovio, U., Jones, R., dos Santos Silva, I. et al. Birth size and survival in breast cancer patients from the Uppsala Birth Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control 24, 1643–1651 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0238-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0238-5

Keywords

Navigation