We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • Published:

The 2011–2016 Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Initiative: Rationale and Design

volume 24pages695704(2013)

Abstract

Purpose

Recognition of the complex, multidimensional relationship between excess adiposity and cancer control outcomes has motivated the scientific community to seek new research models and paradigms.

Methods

The National Cancer Institute developed an innovative concept to establish a center grant mechanism in nutrition, energetics, and physical activity, referred to as the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Initiative. This paper gives an overview of the 2011–2016 TREC Collaborative Network and the 15 research projects being conducted at the centers.

Results

Four academic institutions were awarded TREC center grants in 2011: Harvard University, University of California San Diego, University of Pennsylvania, and Washington University in St. Louis. The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is the Coordination Center. The TREC research portfolio includes three animal studies, three cohort studies, four randomized clinical trials, one cross-sectional study, and two modeling studies. Disciplines represented by TREC investigators include basic science, endocrinology, epidemiology, biostatistics, behavior, medicine, nutrition, physical activity, genetics, engineering, health economics, and computer science. Approximately 41,000 participants will be involved in these studies, including children, healthy adults, and breast and prostate cancer survivors. Outcomes include biomarkers of cancer risk, changes in weight and physical activity, persistent adverse treatment effects (e.g., lymphedema, urinary and sexual function), and breast and prostate cancer mortality.

Conclusion

The NIH Science of Team Science group will evaluate the value added by this collaborative science. However, the most important outcome will be whether this transdisciplinary initiative improves the health of Americans at risk of cancer as well as cancer survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US children and adolescents. JAMA 307:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, Dietz W (2009) Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 28(5):w822–w831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Basen-Engquist K, Chang M (2011) Obesity and cancer risk: recent review and evidence. Curr Oncol Rep 13:71–76

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wolin KY, Carson K, Colditz GA (2010) Obesity and cancer. Oncologist 15:556–565

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pan SY, DesMeules M (2009) Energy intake, physical activity, energy balance, and cancer: epidemiologic evidence. Methods Mol Biol 472:191–215

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bianchini F, Kaaks R, Vainio H (2002) Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 3:565–574

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Winzer BM, Whiteman DC, Reeves MM, Paratz JD (2011) Physical activity and cancer prevention: a systematic review of clinical trials. Cancer Causes Control 22:811–826

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davies NJ, Batehup L, Thomas R (2011) The role of diet and physical activity in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivorship: a review of the literature. Br J Cancer 1:S52–S73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Lynch BM (2010) State of the epidemiological evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 46:2593–2604

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ballard-Barbash R, Hunsberger S, Alciati MH et al (2009) Physical activity, weight control, and breast cancer risk and survival: clinical trial rationale and design considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:630–643

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH (2010) An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surv 4:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Patterson RE, Cadmus LA, Emond JA, Pierce JP (2010) Physical activity, diet, adiposity and breast cancer prognosis: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Maturitas 66:5–15

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C et al (2010) American college of sports medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jones LW, Demark-Wahnefried W (2006) Diet, exercise, and complementary therapies after primary treatment for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:1017–1026

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Harvey AE, Lashinger LM, Hursting SD (2011) The growing challenge of obesity and cancer: an inflammatory issue. Ann NY Acad Sci 1229:45–52

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gallagher EJ, Fierz Y, Ferguson RD, LeRoith D (2010) The pathway from diabetes and obesity to cancer, on the route to targeted therapy. Endocr Pract 16:864–873

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Roberts DL, Dive C, Renehan AG (2010) Biological mechanisms linking obesity and cancer risk: new perspectives. Annu Rev Med 61:301–316

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tsugane S, Inoue M (2010) Insulin resistance and cancer: epidemiological evidence. Cancer Sci 101:1073–1079

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lynch BM, Neilson HK, Friedenreich CM (2011) Physical activity and breast cancer prevention. Recent Results Cancer Res 186:13–42

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP (2008) The science of team science. Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med 35:S77–S89

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Croyle RT (2008) The National Cancer Institute’s transdisciplinary centers initiatives and the need for building a science of team science. Am J Prev Med 35:S90–S93

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Warnecke RB, Oh A, Breen N, Gehlert S, Paskett E, Tucker KL, Lurie N, Rebbeck T, Goodwin J, Flack J, Srinivasan S, Kerner J, Heurtin-Roberts S, Abeles R, Tyson FL, Patmios G, Hiatt RA (2008) Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: the National Institutes of Health Centers for population health and health disparities. Am J Public Health 98(9):1608–1615

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Abrams DB, Leslie F, Mermelstein R, Kobus K, Clayton RR (2003) Transdisciplinary tobacco use research. Nicotine Tob Res 5(Suppl 1):S5–S10

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hall KL, Stokols D, Stipelman BA, Vogel AL, Feng A, Masimore B, Morgan G, Moser RP, Marcus SE, Berrigan D (2012) Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med 42(2):157–163

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rimer BK, Abrams DB (2012) Present and future horizons for transdisciplinary research. Am J Prev Med 42(2):200–201

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vogel AL, Feng A, Oh A, Hall KL, Stipelman B, Okamoto J, Stokols D, Moser RP, Perna F, Nebeling L (2012) Influences of a National Cancer Institute transdisciplinary research and training initiative on trainees’ transdisciplinary research competencies and scholarly productivity. Transl Behav Med 4(2):459–468

  29. 29.

    Stokols D, Hall KL, Vogel AL (2012) Transdisciplinary public health: definitions, core characteristics, and strategies for success. In: Haire-Joshu D, McBride TD (eds) Transdisciplinary public health: research, methods, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

  30. 30.

    Hall KL, Stokols D, Moser RP et al (2008) The collaborative readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers. Findings from the National Cancer Institute’s TREC year-one evaluation study. Am J Prev Med 35:S161–S172

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Neuhouser ML, Schwartz Y, Wang C, Breymeyer K, Coronado G, Wang CY, Noar K, Song X, Lampe JW (2012) A low-glycemic load diet reduces serum C-reactive protein and modestly increases adiponectin in overweight and obese adults. J Nutr 142(2):369–374

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Behan JW, Yun JP, Proektor MP, Ehsanipour EA, Arutyunyan A, Moses AS, Avramis VI, Louie SG, Butturini A, Heisterkamp N, Mittelman SD (2009) Adipocytes impair leukemia treatment in mice. Cancer Res 19:7867–7874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Campbell PT, Gross MD, Potter JD, Schmitz KH, Duggan C, McTiernan A, Ulrich CM (2010) Effect of exercise on oxidative stress: a 12-month randomized, controlled trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(8):1448–1453

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Thompson CL, Larkin EK, Patel S, Berger NA, Redline S, Li L (2011) Short duration of sleep increases risk of colorectal adenoma. Cancer 117(4):841–847

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Arikawa AY, O’Dougherty M, Kaufman B, Thomas W, Warren M, Kurzer M, Schmitz KH (2010) Women in steady exercise research (WISER): study design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 31:457–465

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Arikawa AY, Kurzer MS, Thomas W, Schmitz KH (2010) No effect of exercise on insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, insulin and glucose in young women participating in a 16-week randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:2987–2990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arikawa AY, Thomas W, Schmitz KH, Kurzer MS (2011) Sixteen weeks of exercise reduces C-reactive protein levels in young women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:1002–1009

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Smith AJ, Phipps WR, Arikawa AY, O’Dougherty M, Kaufman B, Thomas W, Schmitz KH, Kurzer MS (2011) Effects of aerobic exercise on premenopausal sex hormone levels: results of the WISER study, a randomized clinical trial in healthy, sedentary, eumenorrheic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20:1098–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, Cheville A, Smith R, Grant LL, Bryan CJ, Williams-Smith CT, Greene QP (2009) Weight lifting in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. New Engl J Med 361:664–673

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel AB, Cheville A, Lewis-Grant L, Smith R, Bryan CJ, Williams-Smith CT, Chittams J (2010) Weight-lifting for women at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized trial. JAMA 304:2699–2705

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute Centers for Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) (U01 CA116850, U54 CA155626, U54 CA155435, U54 CA155850, U54 CA155496). All authors were funded by the NCI as part of the TREC Initiative. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not considered as official or reflecting the views of the National Institutes of Health. Thanks are expressed to all the co-principal investigators, investigators, and co-investigators who are contributing to the study, and also to key staff at each site: TREC Coordination Center: Carolyn C. Ehret and Gina Widell. Harvard University: Vanessa Boulanger, Nancy Campbell, Amy Lane, Laura Shockro, Miranda West, and Devin Wigler. University of California, San Diego: Lisa A. Cadmus-Bertram, Lesley G. Ellies, Shirley W. Flatt, Suneeta Godbole, Simon J. Marshall, Jessica L. Oratowski Coleman, Bilgé Pakiz, Brinda K. Rana, and Nicholas J. Webster. University of Pennsylvania: Renata Alford, Justin Brown, Laura DiGiovanni, Rebecca Dilks, Deborah Dole, Margaret Evangelista, Anagha Kumar, Venetia Lambert, Monica Laudermilk, and Zi Zhang. Washington University in St. Louis: Victoria Anwuri, Casey Fagin, Robert Grubb III, Jennifer Haslag-Minoff, Timothy Hower, Christine Marx, Qiang Wang, and Jessica Wu. Finally, the TREC Initiative is thankful to all the study participants whose involvement is critical to curing cancer!

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Thornquist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, R.E., Colditz, G.A., Hu, F.B. et al. The 2011–2016 Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Initiative: Rationale and Design. Cancer Causes Control 24, 695–704 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0150-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Energetics
  • Obesity
  • Diet
  • Physical activity
  • Cancer
  • Transdisciplinary