Consumption of dairy and meat in relation to breast cancer risk in the Black Women’s Health Study
Dairy and meat consumption may impact breast cancer risk through modification of hormones (e.g., estrogen), through specific nutrients (e.g., vitamin D), or through products formed in processing/cooking (e.g., heterocyclic amines). Results relating meat and dairy intake to breast cancer risk have been conflicting. Thus, we examined the risk of breast cancer in relation to intake of dairy and meat in a large prospective cohort study.
In the Black Women’s Health Study, 1,268 incident breast cancer cases were identified among 52,062 women during 12 years of follow-up. Multivariable (MV) relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Null associations were observed for total milk (MV RR = 1.05, 95 % CI 0.74–1.46 comparing ≥1,000–0 g/week) and total meat (MV RR = 1.04, 95 % CI 0.85–1.28 comparing ≥1,000 < 400 g/week) intake and risk of breast cancer. Associations with intakes of specific types of dairy, specific types of meat, and dietary calcium and vitamin D were also null. The associations were not modified by reproductive (e.g., parity) or lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking). Associations with estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+), ER negative (−), progesterone receptor (PR) +, PR−, ER+/PR+, and ER−/PR− breast cancer were generally null.
This analysis of African-American women provides little support for associations of dairy and meat intake with breast cancer risk.
KeywordsDiet Breast cancer Epidemiology Cohort African-American
- 1.American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
- 16.World Cancer Research Fund, Panel AIfCRE (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 18.Dong JY, Zhang L, He K, Qin LQ (2011) Dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:23–31Google Scholar
- 21.Rosenberg L, Adams-Campbell L, Palmer JR (1995) The Black Women’s Health Study: a follow-up study for causes and preventions of illness. J Am Med Women’s Assoc 50:56–58Google Scholar
- 24.National Cancer Institute (2005) Diet*Calc analysis program, version 1.4.3. National Cancer Institute, Applied Research Program, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- 25.Puckett CD (1986) The educational annotation of ICD-9-CM; Diseases and procedures tabular lists. Channel Pub, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
- 26.World Health Organization (2009) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Ambrosone CB, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L (2011) Parity and lactation in relation to estrogen receptor negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20:1883–1891Google Scholar
- 33.Al Sarakbi W, Salhab M, Mokbel K (2005) Dairy products and breast cancer risk: a review of the literature. Int J Fertil Women’s Med 50:244–249Google Scholar
- 39.Ngo TH, Barnard RJ, Leung PS, Cohen P, Aronson WJ (2003) Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-1 modulate prostate cancer cell growth and apoptosis: possible mediators for the effects of diet and exercise on cancer cell survival. Endocrinology 144:2319–2324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Keith JN, Nicholls J, Reed A, Kafer K, Miller GD (2011) The prevalence of self-reported lactose intolerance and the consumption of dairy foods among African American adults are less than expected. J Natl Med Assoc 103:36–45Google Scholar