Abstract
Objective
Prior studies report statins may reduce the risk of advanced prostate cancer. This study investigates the association between statin use and the likelihood of having a PSA or DRE test, blood PSA levels, prostate volume, and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. We also describe the association between statin use and prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) before and after controlling for prostate cancer screening indices associated with statin use.
Methods
The Nashville Men’s Health Study used a multicenter, rapid recruitment protocol to collect clinical, biologic, behavioral, and body measurement data from 2,148 men 40 years or older scheduled for diagnostic prostate biopsy. Medication use and other data were ascertained by research survey, clinical interview, and chart review.
Results
Approximately 37% of participants were taking a statin. Statin use was significantly associated with a 12% lower PSA levels and 8% smaller prostate volume after controlling for age, race, BMI, WHR, aspirin use, and other comorbidity. Simvastatin was more strongly associated with prostate volume, while atorvastatin was associated with PSA. Statin use was marginally associated with increasing PSA test frequency among men with undiagnosed cancer. Statin use was not associated with the frequency or results of digital rectal exams, lower urinary tract symptom severity, high-grade (Gleason > 6) prostate cancer (OR = 0.95 (0.73, 1.24)), low-grade (Gleason = 6) prostate cancer (OR = 1.11 (0.86, 1.42)) or PIN (OR = 0.82, (0.57, 1.17)). Additional control for the number of prior PSA tests, PSA levels, and prostate volume did not alter these results.
Conclusion
These results suggest selective referral for biopsy associated with statin use is an essential element to address in further understanding the potential for statins to prevent prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moyad MA (2004) Improving overall men’s health and potentially reducing the risk of certain cancers via serum markers and risk assessment for coronary heart disease. Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Investig 22:485–489
Platz EA, Till C, Goodman PJ et al (2009) Men with low serum cholesterol have a lower risk of high-grade prostate cancer in the placebo arm of the prostate cancer prevention trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:2807–2813
Hebert PR, Gaziano JM, Chan KS, Hennekens CH (1997) Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials. JAMA 278:313–321
Jain MK, Ridker PM (2005) Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4:977–987
Murtola TJ, Tammela TL, Lahtela J, Auvinen A (2007) Cholesterol-lowering drugs and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case–control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2226–2232
Farwell WR, Scranton RE, Lawler EV et al (2008) The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:134–139
Boudreau DM, Yu O, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL (2008) Statin use and prostate cancer risk in a large population-based setting. Cancer Causes Control 19:767–774
Jacobs EJ, Rodriguez C, Bain EB, Wang Y, Thun MJ, Calle EE (2007) Cholesterol-lowering drugs and advanced prostate cancer incidence in a large U.S. cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2213–2217
Platz EA, Leitzmann MF, Visvanathan K et al (2006) Statin drugs and risk of advanced prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1819–1825
Breau RH, Karnes RJ, Jacobson DJ et al (2010) The association between statin use and the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a population based cohort. J Urol 184:494–500
Flick ED, Habel LA, Chan KA et al (2007) Statin use and risk of prostate cancer in the California Men’s Health Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2218–2225
Friedman GD, Flick ED, Udaltsova N, Chan PD, Quesenberry CP, Habel LA (2008) Screening statins for possible carcinogenic risk: up to 9 years of follow-up of 361ΓÇë859 recipients. Pharmacoepidem Drug Safe 17:27–36
Murtola TJ, Tammela TL, Maattanen L et al. (2010) Prostate cancer and PSA among statin users in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial. Int J Cancer
Banez LL, Klink JC, Jayachandran J et al (2010) Association between statins and prostate tumor inflammatory infiltrate in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:722–728
Agalliu I, Salinas CA, Hansten PD, Ostrander EA, STanford JL (2008) Statin use and risk of prostate cancer: results from a population-based epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol 168:250–260
Mondul AM, Selvin E, De Marzo AM, Freedland SJ, Platz EA (2010) Statin drugs, serum cholesterol, and prostate-specific antigen in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2004. Cancer Causes Control
Hamilton RJ, Goldberg KC, Platz EA, Freedland SJ (2008) The influence of statin medications on prostate-specific antigen levels. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1511–1518
Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM et al (2003) The influence of Finasteride on the Development of Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 349:213–222
Mills IW, Crossland A, Patel A, Ramonas H (2007) Atorvastatin treatment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 52:503–509
Fowke JH, Matthews CE (2010) PSA and body composition by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in NHANES. Prostate 70:120–125
Fowke JH, Motley S, Smith JA, Jr., Cookson MS, Concepcion R, Chang SS (2008) Association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, PSA, and Prostate Volume. J Urol
Werny DM, Saraiya M, Gregg EW (2006) Prostate-specific antigen values in diabetic and nondiabetic US Men, 2001–2002. Am J Epidemiol 164:978–983
Loeb S, Kan D, Helfand BT, Nadler RB, Catalona WJ (2009) Is statin use associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness? BJU Int
Algotar AM, Thompson PA, Ranger-Moore J et al. (2010) Effect of aspirin, other NSAIDs, and statins on PSA and PSA velocity. Prostate
Hall SA, Page ST, Travison TG, Montgomery RB, Link CL, McKinlay JB (2007) Do statins affect androgen levels in men? Results from the Boston area community health survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1587–1594
Graaf MR, Richel DJ, van Noorden CJ, Guchelaar HJ (2004) Effects of statins and farnesyltransferase inhibitors on the development and progression of cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 30:609–641
Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL (1984) The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 132:474–479
Fowke JH, Motley SS, Cookson MS et al (2006) The association between body size, prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:137–142
Michel MC, Heemann U, Schumacher H, Mehlburger L, Goepel M (2004) Association of hypertension with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172:1390–1393
Parsons JK, Bergstrom J, Barrett-Connor E (2008) Lipids, lipoproteins and the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia in community-dwelling men. BJU Int 101:313–318
Nelson WG, DeMarzo AM, DeWeese TL, Isaacs WB (2004) The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. J Urol 172:S6–S11
Sreekumar A, Poisson LM, Rajendiran TM et al (2009) Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression. Nature 457:910–914
Moyad MA, Merrick GS, Butler WM et al (2005) Statins, especially atorvastatin, may favorably influence clinical presentation and biochemical progression-free survival after brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 66:1150–1154
Acknowledgments
The project described was supported by grant R01CA121060 from the National Cancer Institute and UL1 RR024975 from NCRR.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowke, J.H., Motley, S.S., Barocas, D.A. et al. The associations between statin use and prostate cancer screening, prostate size, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control 22, 417–426 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9713-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9713-4