Abstract
Background
Though cervical cancer rates have declined due to Pap screening, racial and socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality persist. This study assesses the relative impact of race/ethnicity and neighborhood poverty on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New York City (NYC).
Methods
Invasive cervical cancer cases in NYC from 1995 to 2006 were identified along with demographic and socioeconomic measures. Odds ratios (OR) of late stage diagnosis were estimated using logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HR) of death were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
From 1995 to 2006 cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates decreased in NYC, though black and Hispanic women had higher incidence and mortality rates than white women. Puerto Ricans (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.20–2.01) and blacks (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.15–1.57) were more likely to be diagnosed with late stage disease than whites. In multivariate analysis, blacks had similar mortality risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI = 0.95–1.20) to whites while Puerto Ricans had increased risk (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.10–1.55), and non-Puerto Rican Hispanics (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.45–0.63) and Asian/PIs (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.52–0.78) had reduced risk. Women living in high poverty neighborhoods had higher mortality than women in higher income neighborhoods (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.16–1.52).
Conclusions
Black and Puerto Rican women in NYC are at greatest risk of dying from cervical cancer. Race/ethnicity is predictive of late stage diagnosis, while both race/ethnicity and neighborhood poverty are important predictors of cervical cancer mortality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer facts and figures
Garner EIO (2003) Cervical cancer: disparities in screening, treatment, and survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(3):242s–247
Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb D, Howlander N, Horner M et al. (2008) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2005. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website 2008; Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/. Accessed 08, 2008
del Carmen MG, Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, Cornelison T, Trimble E (1999) Ethnic differences in patterns of care of Stage 1A1 and Stage 1A2 cervical cancer: A SEER database study. Gynecologic Oncol 75(1):113–117
Downs LS, Smith JS, Scarinci I, Flowers L, Parham G (2008) The disparity of cervical cancer in diverse populations. Gynecologic Oncol 109(2, Suppl 1):S22–S30
Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):334–357
Karpati A, Kerker B, Mostashari F, Singh T, Hajat A, Thorpe L et al (2004) Health disparities in New York City. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York
Kerker B, Kim M, Mostashari F, Thorpe L, Friedan T (2005) Women at risk: the health of women in New York City. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York
Wang JH, Sheppard VB, Schwartz MD, Liang W, Mandelblatt JS (2008) Disparities in cervical cancer screening between Asian American and Non-Hispanic White women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17(8):1968–1973
Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA (2001) Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population. Healthy People Statistical Notes, no. 20. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Ass 72:557–565
Gallagher B, Wang Z, Schymura MJ, Kahn A, Fordyce EJ (2001) Cancer incidence in New York State acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Am J Epidemiol 154(6):544–556
Akers AY, Newmann SJ, Smith JS (2007) Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. Curr Probl Cancer 31(3):157–181
Bates JH, Hofer BM, Parikh-Patel A (2008) Cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Asian subgroups in California, 1990–2004. Cancer 113(10):2955–2963
Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Ward E, Ries LAG et al. (2005) Annual report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(19):1407–1427
Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM (2003) A framework for improving the quality of cancer care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(1):4–13
Yabroff KR, Washington KS, Leader A, Neilson E, Mandelblatt J (2003) Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results. Med Care Res Rev 60(3):294–331
Dunne EF, Unger ER, Sternberg M, McQuillan G, Swan DC, Patel SS et al (2007) Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States. JAMA 297(8):813–819
Spence AR, Goggin P, Franco EL (2007) Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 45(2–3):93–106
Olson E, Van Wye G, Kerker B, Thorpe L (2006) Cervical cancer screening in New York City. NYC Vital Signs 5(3):1–4
Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro JA, Warnecke RB (2004) Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer 101(S5):1131–1145
Coker AL, Du XL, Fang S, Eggleston KS (2006) Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: Findings from the SEER–Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol 102(2):278–284
Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN (2008) Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the health belief model. J Lower Genital Tract Disease 12(3):232–241
Benard VB, Lawson HW, Eheman CR, Anderson C, Helsel W (2005) Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet Gynecol 105(6):1323–1328
Newmann SJ, Garner EO (2005) Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review. Cancer Causes Control 16(1):63–70
Patel DA, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Patel MK, Malone J, John M, Chuba PJ, Schwartz K (2005) A population-based study of racial and ethnic differences in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. Gynecol Oncol 97(2):550–558
Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Williams M, Tortolero-Luna G, Martin JB, Tortolero SR (2006) Cervical cancer survival by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and place of residence in Texas, 1995–2001. J Women’s Health 15(8):941–951
Leath III CA, Straughn J, Michael J, Kirby TO, Huggins A, Partridge EE, Parham GP (2005) Predictors of outcomes for women with cervical carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncol 99(2):432–436
Thoms W, Unger E, Johnson P, Spann C, Hunter S, Smith R et al (1995) Cervical cancer survival in a high risk urban population. Cancer 76(12):2518–2523
Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Lucci J, Fleming LE, Koniaris LG (2009) Disparities in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer. Cancer 115(1):166–178
Movva S, Noone A, Banerjee M, Patel D, Schwartz K, Yee C et al (2008) Racial differences in cervical cancer survival in the Detroit metropolitan area. Cancer 112(6):1264–1271
Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2004) Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975–2000. Cancer 101(5):1051–1057
Lin S, Clarke C, Prehn A, Glaser S, West D, O’Malley C (2002) Survival differences among Asian subpopulations in the United States after prostate, colorectal, breast, and cervical carcinomas. Cancer 94(4):1175–1182
Abraído-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Flórez KR (2005) Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation?: implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med 61(6):1243–1255
Lobo AP, Flores RJO, Salvo JJ (2002) The impact of Hispanic growth on the racial/ethnic composition of New York City neighborhoods. Urban Aff Rev 37(5):703–727
Lara M, Gamboa C, Kahramanian MI, Morales LS, Hayes Bautista DE (2005) Acculturation and latino health in the United States: a review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annu Rev Public Health 26(1):367–397
Singh G, Miller B, Hankey B, Edwards B (2004) Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in US incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975–2000. Cancer 101(5):1051–1057
Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader M, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Epidemiol 156(5):471–482
Acknowledgments
We thank Pei-Chi Chung, MD, Lorna Thorpe, Ph.D., Lynn Silver, MD, MPH, and the staff of the Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention & Control and the Health Research Training Program at the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for their advice and cooperation on this project. Dr. Visvanathan is a recipient of an American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Career Development Award and a KO7 Preventive Oncology Academic Award (CA111948) from the National Cancer Institute.
Grant support
Funding for this project was provided by the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation through the NYC Epi Scholars Program at the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCarthy, A.M., Dumanovsky, T., Visvanathan, K. et al. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mortality among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York City, 1995–2006. Cancer Causes Control 21, 1645–1655 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9593-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9593-7