Meat, poultry and fish and risk of colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of data from the UK dietary cohort consortium
Some but not all epidemiological studies have reported that high intakes of red and processed meat are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. In the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium, we examined associations of meat, poultry and fish intakes with colorectal cancer risk using standardised individual dietary data pooled from seven UK prospective studies.
Four- to seven-day food diaries were analysed, disaggregating the weights of meat, poultry and fish from composite foods to investigate dose–response relationships. We identified 579 cases of colorectal cancer and matched with 1,996 controls on age, sex and recruitment date. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios for colorectal cancer associated with meat, poultry and fish intakes, adjusting for relevant covariables.
Disaggregated intakes were moderately low, e.g. mean red meat intakes were 38.2 g/day among male and 28.7 g/day among female controls. There was little evidence of association between the food groups examined and risk for colorectal cancer: Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for a 50 g/day increase were 1.01 (0.84–1.22) for red meat, 0.88 (0.68–1.15) for processed meat, 0.97 (0.84–1.12) for red and processed meat combined, 0.80 (0.65–1.00) for poultry, 0.92 (0.70–1.21) for white fish and 0.89 (0.70–1.13) for fatty fish.
This study using pooled data from prospective food diaries, among cohorts with low to moderate meat intakes, shows little evidence of association between consumption of red and processed meat and colorectal cancer risk.
KeywordsProspective Food diary Meat Fish Colorectal cancer
We thank the participants in these cohort studies for their contribution to this research.
The UK Dietary Cohort Consortium at the MRC Centre for Nutritional Epidemiology in Cancer Prevention and Survival is funded by the Medical Research Council. The cohort studies included in this consortium received funding from: British Heart Foundation; Cancer Research UK; Department of Health, UK; Food Standards Agency, UK; Lloyds TSB Foundation for the Channel Islands; Medical Research Council, UK; the Stroke Association, UK, and the World Cancer Research Fund.
Conflict of interest statement
TJK is a member of the Vegan Society, UK.
- 2.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dahm CD, Keogh RH, Spencer EA et al (2010) Protective association of dietary fiber with colorectal cancer risk: results from the UK dietary cohort consortium using food diary data. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq151
- 17.Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA, Southgate AT (1991) McCance and Widdowson’s the composition of foods, 5th edn. Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 21.StataCorp (2007) Stata statistical software: release 10. StataCorp LP, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cho E, Smith-Warner SA (2004) For the pooling project of prospect studies of diet and cancer investigators. Meat and fat intake and colorectal cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 14 prospective studies [abstract] In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. Vol 45: Abstract nr 491Google Scholar