Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening pharmaceuticals for possible carcinogenic effects: initial positive results for drugs not previously screened

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To screen commonly used prescription drugs for possible carcinogenic effects.

Methods

In a large health care program we identified 105 commonly used drugs, not previously screened. Recipients were followed for up to 12½ years for incident cancer. Nested case–control analyses of 55 cancer sites and all combined included up to ten matched controls per case, with lag of at least 2 years between drug dispensing and cancer. Positive associations entailed a relative risk of 1.50, with p ≤ 0.01 and higher risk for three or more, than for one prescription. Evaluation included further analyses, searches of the literature, and clinical judgment.

Results

There were 101 associations of interest for 61 drugs. Sixty-six associations were judged to have involved substantial confounding. We found evidence that of the remaining 35, the following associations may not be due to chance: sulindac with gallbladder cancer and leukemia, hyoscyamine with nonHodgkin lymphoma, nortriptyline with esophageal and hepatic cancer, oxazepam with lung cancer, both fluoxetine and paroxetine with testicular cancer, hydrochlorothiazide with renal and lip cancer, and nifedipine with lip cancer.

Conclusions

These preliminary findings suggest that further studies are indicated regarding sulindac, hyoscyamine, nortriptyline, oxazepam, fluoxetine, paroxetine, hydrochlorothiazide, and nifedipine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (2007) Committee on the assessment of the US drug safety system. The future of drug safety: promoting and protecting the health of the public. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman GD, Ury HK (1980) Initial screening for carcinogenicity of commonly used drugs. JNCI 65:723–733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman GD, Ury HK (1983) Screening for possible drug carcinogenicity: second report of findings. JNCI 71:1165–1175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Fireman BH (1989) Screening prescription drugs for possible carcinogenicity: eleven to fifteen years of follow-up. Cancer Res 49:5736–5747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Den Eeden SK, Friedman GD (1995) Prescription drug screening for subsequent carcinogenicity. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 4:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (1980) Some pharmaceutical drugs, vol 24. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  7. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (1987) Supplement no. 7: overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs, vol 1–42. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  8. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (1990) Pharmaceutical drugs, vol 50. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  9. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (1996) Some pharmaceutical drugs, vol 66. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  10. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2000) Some antiviral and antineoplastic drugs and other pharmaceutical agents, vol 76. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  11. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2001) Some thyrotropic drugs, vol 79. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  12. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2007) Combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen-progestogen menopausal therapy, vol 91. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krieger N (1992) Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 82:703–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Selby JV, Smith DH, Johnson E, Raebel MA, Friedman GD, McFarland BH (2005) The Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program. In: Strom BL (ed) Pharmacoepidemiology, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 241–259

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oehrli MD, Quesenberry CP, Leyden W (2007) Northern California Cancer Registry: 2007 annual report on trends, incidence, and outcomes. Kaiser Permanente, Northern California Cancer Registry

  16. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  17. SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS Online Doc© 9.1.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Cancer Institute (2007) SEER program coding and staging manual. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frisch M, Melbye M (2006) Anal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 830–840

    Google Scholar 

  20. McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Tarone RE, Blot WJ (2006) Renal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1087–1100

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ron E, Schneider AB (2006) Thyroid cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 975–994

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cook LS, Weiss NS, Doherty JA, Chen C (2006) Endometrial cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1027–1043

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Fraumeni JF Jr (2006) Esophageal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 697–706

    Google Scholar 

  24. London WT, McGlynn KA (2006) Liver cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 763–786

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ross JA, Xie Y, Davies SM, Shu XO, Pendergrass TW, Robison LL (2003) Prescription medication use during pregnancy and risk of infant leukemia (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedman GD, Flick ED, Udaltsova N, Chan J, Quesenberry CP Jr, Habel LA (2008) Screening statins for possible carcinogenic risk: up to nine years of follow-up of 361, 859 recipients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17:27–36 Erratum 17: 751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamat AM, Nelkin GM (2005) Atorvastatin: a potential chemopreventive agent in bladder cancer. Urology 66:1209–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dostal LA, Juneau P, Rothwell CE (2001) Repeated analysis of semen parameters in beagle dogs during a two-year study with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. Toxicol Sci 61:128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dostal LA, Whitfield LR, Anderson JA (1996) Fertility and general reproductive studies in rats with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. Fundam Appl Toxicol 32:285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Habel LA, Friedman GD (2006) Pharmaceuticals other than hormones. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 489–506

    Google Scholar 

  31. Coleman CI, Baker WL, Kluger J, White CM (2008) Antihypertensive medication and their impact on cancer incidence: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens 26:622–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steingart AB, Cotterchio M (1995) Do antidepressants cause, promote, or inhibit cancers? J Clin Epidemiol 48:1407–1412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lawlor DA, Jüni P, Ebrahim S, Egger M (2003) Systematic review of the epidemiologic and trial evidence of an association between antidepressant medication and breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Coogan PF (2006) Review of the epidemiological literature on antidepressant use and breast cancer risk. Expert Rev Neurother 6:1363–1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jensen AO, Thomsen HF, Engebjerg MC, Olesen AB, Sørensen HT, Karagas MR (2008) Use of photosensitizing diuretics and risk of skin cancer: a population-based case–control study. Br J Cancer [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 18813314

  36. Mayne ST, Morse DE, Winn DM (2006) Cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 674–696

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hartge P, Wang SS, Bracci PM, Devesa SS, Holly EA (2006) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 898–918

    Google Scholar 

  38. Linet MS, Devesa SS, Morgan GJ (2006) The leukemias. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 841–871

    Google Scholar 

  39. Perron L, Bairati I, Harel F, Meyer F (2004) Antihypertensive drug use and the risk of prostate cancer (Canada). Cancer Causes Control 15:535–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jackson CD, Fishbein L (1986) A toxicological review of beta-adrenergic blockers. Fundam Appl Toxicol 6:395–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cooper SM, Wojnarowska F (2003) Photo-damage in Northern European renal transplant recipients is associated with use of calcium channel blockers. Clin Exp Dermatol 28:588–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Harlow BL, Cramer DW, Baron JA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Greenberg ER (1998) Psychotropic medication use and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:697–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Friedman GD (1992) Re: antidepressant drugs, depression, and cancer: an editor comments. Am J Epidemiol 136:1415–1416

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haque R, Enger SM, Chem W, Petitti DB (2005) Breast cancer risk in a large cohort of female antidepressant medication users. Cancer Lett 221:61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomson Healthcare Inc. (2007) Physicians’ desk reference 2008, 62nd edn. Thomson Healthcare Inc., Montvale, p 1543

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Patrono C (2002) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents: mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical issues. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:252–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Levi MS, Borne RF, Williamson JS (2001) A review of cancer chemopreventive agents. Curr Med Chem 8:1349–1362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiu LCM, Tong KF, Ooi VEC (2005) Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of cyclooxygenase inhibitors and their synergy with docosahexaenoic acid on the growth of human skin melanoma A-375 cells. Biomed Pharmacother 59:S293–S297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Knottenbelt C, Chambers E, Gault C, Argyle DJ (2006) The in vitro effects of piroxicam and meloxicam on canine cell lines. J Small Anim Pract 47:14–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mueller NE, Grufferman S (2006) Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 872–897

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dobrinska MR, Furst DE, Spiegel T et al (1983) Biliary secretion of sulindac and metabolites in man. Biopharm Drug Dispos 4:347–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dujovne CA, Pitterman A, Vincek WC, Dobrinska MR, Davies RO, Duggan DE (1983) Enterohepatic circulation of sulindac and metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 33:172–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tokumine F, Sunagawa T, Shiohira Y, Nakamoto T, Miyazato F, Muto Y (1999) Drug-associated cholelithiasis: a case of sulindac stone formation and the incorporation of sulindac metabolites into the gallstones. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2285–2288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hsing AW, Rashif A, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF Jr (2006) Biliary tract cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 489–506

    Google Scholar 

  55. Miller JL (1980) Marrow aplasia and sulindac. Ann Intern Med 92:129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sanz MA, Martinez JA, Gomis F, Garcia-Borras JJ (1980) Sulindac-induced bone marrow toxicity. Lancet 2:802–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kiyingi A, Robertson TI, Green DG (1985) Aplastic anemia and acute leukemia: a possible relationship with sulindac therapy? Aust N Z J Med 15:455–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Biederbeck-Noll AB, Sturkenboom MCJM, van der Linden PD et al (2003) Verapamil is associated with an increased risk of cancer in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. Eur J Cancer 39:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. La Vecchia C, Bosetti C (2003) Calcium channel blockers, verapamil and cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 39:7–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Anderson KE, Mack TM, Silverman DT (2006) Cancer of the pancreas. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 721–762

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hankinson SE, Danforth KN (2008) Ovarian cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1013–1026

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grant R01 098838 from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Friedman served on an advisory committee to Roche Laboratories in June 2008 and in the past 3 years has consulted for law firms serving both plaintiffs and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals regarding litigation concerning celecoxib and Ortho-Evra, respectively. During the last 5 years, Dr. Habel has had research support through contracts with Kaiser Foundation Research Institute from Eli Lilly, Inc.; Genomic Health, Inc.; Takeda; Merck; AviaraDx; Genentech; and Roche. None of these sponsors had any role in this manuscript; they did not sponsor the research, have any role in its study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of results, or drafting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary D. Friedman.

Additional information

This work performed at Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, G.D., Udaltsova, N., Chan, J. et al. Screening pharmaceuticals for possible carcinogenic effects: initial positive results for drugs not previously screened. Cancer Causes Control 20, 1821–1835 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9375-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9375-2

Keywords

Navigation