Skip to main content
Log in

Lung cancer in chrysotile asbestos workers: analyses based on the two-stage clonal expansion model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the magnitude and temporal pattern of lung cancer risk following exposure to chrysotile asbestos.

Methods

I analyzed data on lung cancer mortality in a cohort of asbestos textile workers who were exposed to almost pure chrysotile. Employment history and industrial hygiene data were used to derive asbestos exposure estimates. These data were analyzed within the framework of the two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Under the TSCE model, the association between chrysotile asbestos and lung cancer mortality was primarily due to an exposure-induced increase in the proliferation of initiated cells. In a setting of protracted exposure to chrysotile asbestos, this model implies that the estimated hazard ratio was at its maximum between ages 40 and 65 years. Cox regression analyses support these conclusions; the estimated excess relative risk per fiber-year/ml was 0.053 (95% CI: 0.023, 0.124) at ages <65 years, while there was minimal evidence of association at older attained ages.

Conclusions

The TSCE model fits these data well, accommodating the observed departure from the proportional hazards assumption. These analyses suggest that the effect of chrysotile asbestos exposure on lung cancer risk varies with attained age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2006) Elimination of asbestos-related diseases. World Health Organization, Geneva September, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dement JM, Harris RL Jr, Symons MJ, Shy CM (1983) Exposures and mortality among chrysotile asbestos workers. Part I. Exposure estimates. Am J Ind Med 4(3):399–419. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700040303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hein MJ, Stayner LT, Lehman E, Dement JM (2007) Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure–response. Occup Environ Med 64(9):616–625. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stayner L, Smith R, Bailer J, Gilbert S, Steenland K, Dement J et al (1997) Exposure–response analysis of risk of respiratory disease associated with occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos. Occup Environ Med 54(9):646–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dement JM, Brown DP, Okun A (1994) Follow-up study of chrysotile asbestos textile workers: cohort mortality and case-control analyses. Am J Ind Med 26(4):431–447. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700260402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas DC (1988) Models for exposure-time-response relationships with applications to cancer epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health 9:451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.09.050188.002315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moolgavkar SH (1986) Carcinogenesis modeling: from molecular biology to epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health 7:151–169. doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186.001055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidenreich WF, Luebeck EG, Moolgavkar SH (1997) Some properties of the hazard function of the two-mutation clonal expansion model. Risk Anal 17(3):391–399. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00878.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. SAS Institute Inc (2007) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

  10. Preston DL, Lubin JH, Pierce DA, McConney ME (1993) Epicure: user’s guide. Hirosoft International Corporation, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson DB, Wing S (1998) Methods for investigating age differences in the effects of prolonged exposures. Am J Ind Med 33(2):123–130. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199802)33:2<123::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearce N (1988) Multistage modelling of lung cancer mortality in asbestos textile workers. Int J Epidemiol 17:747–752. doi:10.1093/ije/17.4.747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peto J, Seidman H, Selikoff IJ (1982) Mesothelioma mortality in asbestos workers: implications for models of carcinogenesis and risk assessment. Br J Cancer 45(1):124–135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas DC (1983) Statistical methods for analyzing effects of temporal patterns of exposure on cancer risks. Scand J Work Environ Health 9(4):353–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siemiatycki J, Wacholder S, Dewar R, Wald L, Begin D, Richardson L et al (1988) Smoking and degree of occupational exposure: are internal analyses in cohort studies likely to be confounded by smoking status? Am J Ind Med 13(1):59–69. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700130105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Axelson O, Steenland K (1988) Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies. Am J Ind Med 13(1):105–118. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700130107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas DC, Whittemore AS (1988) Methods for testing interactions, with applications to occupational exposures, smoking, and lung cancer. Am J Ind Med 13(1):131–147. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700130109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D (2004) Research methods in occupational epidemiology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by grant K01-OH008635 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, D.B. Lung cancer in chrysotile asbestos workers: analyses based on the two-stage clonal expansion model. Cancer Causes Control 20, 917–923 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9297-z

Keywords

Navigation