Dietary patterns and risk of bladder cancer: a factor analysis in Uruguay
- 197 Downloads
To determine the major dietary patterns associated with bladder cancer risk, we conducted a principal components analysis (PCA) in a case–control study from Uruguay.
A total of 255 newly diagnosed and microscopically confirmed cases of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and 501 hospitalized controls were included in the study. Both series were drawn from the four major public hospitals in Montevideo, Uruguay. Cases and controls were frequency matched on age and sex. Controls were submitted to factor (principal components) analysis.
We retained three factors that explained 25.1% of the total variance (including error variance). The first factor was labeled as the sweet beverages pattern. This factor was characterized by high loadings of coffee, tea, and added sugar and was strongly associated with risk of bladder cancer (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.96–5.45). The second factor was labeled as the Western pattern and displayed high loadings of red meat, fried eggs, potatoes, and red wine. This pattern was directly associated with risk of bladder cancer (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.42–3.89). Finally, the third factor was labeled as the prudent pattern and showed high loadings of fresh vegetables, cooked vegetables, and fruits. This pattern was not associated with risk of bladder cancer.
According to our study, non-alcoholic beverages were the strongest risk factor for bladder cancer, whereas the Western pattern was also associated with a significant increase in risk of bladder cancer.
KeywordsBladder cancer Dietary patterns Factor analysis Principal components
- 1.Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB (eds) (2002) Cancer incidence in five continents, vol VIII. IARC Scientific Publications No 155, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 2.IARC (2004) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 83. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 3.Silverman DT, Morrison AS, Devesa SS (1996) Bladder cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 4.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 8.Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kim J-O, Mueller CW (1978) Factor analysis. Statistical methods and practical issues. Sage University Paper No 14, California, USAGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kline P (2002) An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1-The analysis of case–control studies. IARC Scientific Publications No 32. IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 13.STATA (2005) Stata reference guide. Release 9. College Station, TexasGoogle Scholar
- 21.Blot WJ, Chow W-H, McLaughlin JK (1996) Tea and cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Eur J Cancer Prev 8:425–438Google Scholar
- 29.IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention (2003) Fruit and vegetables, vol 8. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 231–234Google Scholar
- 30.Martinez ME, Marshall JR, Sechrest L (1998) Invited commentary: factor analysis and the search for objectivity. Am J Epidemiol 146:17–19Google Scholar
- 31.Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple factor analysis: a development and expansion of vectors of the mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar