Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beliefs about Tobacco Industry (mal)Practices and Youth Smoking Behaviour: Insight for Future Tobacco Control Campaigns (Canada)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine how student beliefs about tobacco industry behaviour and marketing practices were related to occasional and regular smoking among 9th to 12th graders. These findings can provide insight for developing new tobacco industry denormalization messages for youth smoking populations.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were collected from 14,767 grade 9 to 12 students attending 22 secondary schools within one Public Health Region of Canada using the Tobacco Module of School Heath Action, Planning and Evaluation System (SHAPES). Logistic regression analyses were used to determine if different beliefs about tobacco companies were able to differentiate never smokers from occasional smokers, and occasional smokers from regular smokers.

Results

Occasional and regular smoking behaviour was significantly related to student beliefs about tobacco companies doing good things in the community, manipulating young people to think smoking is cool, advertising to youth, and using athletes and sports sponsorships to get young people to smoke.

Conclusions

This study identified that beliefs about tobacco industry behaviour and marketing practices were related to youth smoking behaviour. In order to address the unique needs of smoking youth, discussions for future tobacco industry denormalization campaigns should consider messages tailored to focus on corporate social responsibility, sport and cultural event sponsorship and industry manipulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004) The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Health Canada (2005) New directions for tobacco control in Canada: a national strategy. Steering Committee of the National Strategy to Reduce Tobacco Use in Canada, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  3. Non-Smokers’ Right Association (2004) Tobacco industry denormalization: telling the truth about the tobacco industry’s role in the tobacco epidemic. Non-Smokers’ Rights Association Smoking and Health Action Foundation, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, Brooks RG (2000) Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998–2000. JAMA 284(6):723–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S (2001) The Florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control 10(1):9–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML (2002) Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92(6):901–907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG (2005) Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 95(3):425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK (1996) Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 15(5):355–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Yarsevich JM et al. (2002) Getting to the Truth: Assessing Youths’ Reactions to the truthsm and “Think. Don’t Smoke” Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns. American Legacy Foundation, Legacy First Look Report (9), June 2002

  10. Ashley MJ, Cohen JE (2003) What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products. Tob Control 12(4):396–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman LK, Glantz SA (1998) Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 279(10):772–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford-Hutchinson S, Rothwell A (2002) The public’s perception of advertising in today’s society: Report on the findings from a research study. Advertising Standards Authority, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J (2003) Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control 12(Suppl1):i35–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pechman C, Stewart DW (1990) The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. J Consumer Res 17:180–191

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pechman C, Reibling ET (2000) Planning an effective anti-smoking mass media campaign targeting adolescents. J Public Health Manag Practice 6(3):80–94

    Google Scholar 

  16. The School Health Action, Planning and Evaluation System [online]. 2005 (Cited 2005 Oct 10). Available from: http://www.shapes.uwaterloo.ca/

  17. Leatherdale ST, McDonald PW, Cameron R, Brown KS (2005) A multi-level analysis examining the relationship between social influences for smoking and smoking onset. Am J Health Behav 29:520–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Health Canada (2005) 2002 Youth Smoking Survey Technical Report. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hirschhorn N (2004) Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype? Tob Control 13(4):447–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ajzen I (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Human Decision Proc 50:179–211

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dewhirst T, Sparks R (2003) Intertextuality, tobacco sponsorship of sports, and adolescent male smoking culture. J Sport Social Issues 27(4):372–398

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dewhirst T, Hunter A (2002) Tobacco sponsorship of Formula One and CART auto racing: tobacco brand exposure and enhanced symbolic imagery through co-sponsors’ third party advertising. Tob Control 11(2):146–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hafez N, Ling PM (2005) How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: implications for international tobacco control. Tob Control 14(4):262–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson S, Hastings G, MacFadyen L (2002) Strategic marketing in the UK tobacco industry. Lancet Oncol 3(8):481–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilpin EA, White VM, Pierce JP (2005) How effective are tobacco industry bar and club marketing efforts in reaching young adults? Tob Control 14(1):186–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen CP, Chen T, Tsai YY et al. (2005) Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers? Tob Control 14(Suppl1):i38–i44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teague CE (1973) Research planning memorandum on some thoughts about new brands of cigarettes for the youth market. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. February 02, 1973. Bates No, 502987357–7368. Available at: http://www.rjrtdocs.com, www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/mangini. Accessed June 06, 2005

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation (CBRPE) for providing financial support for this project. The authors would also like to thank Public Health and the schools and students who participated, and Dr. David Hammond at the University of Waterloo for his developmental work with the denormalization items used in the SHAPES Tobacco Module.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott T. Leatherdale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leatherdale, S.T., Sparks, R. & Kirsh, V.A. Beliefs about Tobacco Industry (mal)Practices and Youth Smoking Behaviour: Insight for Future Tobacco Control Campaigns (Canada). Cancer Causes Control 17, 705–711 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0004-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0004-z

Keywords

Navigation