Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Epidemiology of Breast Cancer Among Men and Women in the US, 1996 to 2000

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Few investigations of breast cancer among men have been conducted because of the relative rarity of this malignancy. The objective of this analysis was to compare the demographic, pathological, and clinical features of breast cancer among men and women.

Methods

Breast cancer among 6379 men and 744,275 women was identified through 34 US population-based registries in the US during the period 1996 to 2000. These registries were estimated to represent 69% of the US population. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR) were calculated per million population using counts derived from the 2000 US census.

Results

The AAIR of breast cancer among men (16.6) was substantially lower than the incidence among women (1557.7). Rates of breast cancer among black men were higher than among white and Asian-Pacific Island men, in contrast to women among whom rates in whites exceeded those among other ethnic groups. Similar to women, breast cancer rates among non-Hispanic men were 50% greater than among Hispanic men. Ductal cancer was the most common histologic type diagnosed in both sexes. The incidence of lobular cancer was rare in men, but Paget’s disease and papillary carcinoma occurred with lower relative frequency in women than in men. Lobular breast cancers were less common among black men and women than among other ethnic groups. In situ breast cancer was diagnosed in 10.8% of men and 16.2% of women. Localized breast cancer was the most common stage at diagnosis in both sexes and all ethnic groups, although women were more likely than men to be diagnosed at a localized stage. Cancer was 10% more likely to be diagnosed in the left breast than the right breast among men compared to 4% in women.

Conclusions

In spite of the rare incidence of breast cancer in men, the descriptive epidemiology of this malignancy is surprisingly similar to that in women. An explanation for the greater relative incidence of breast cancer in black men is a research challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Levi F Lucchini C Vecchia ParticleLa (2002) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of male breast cancer Eur J Cancer Prev 11 315–318 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vmtlSgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12195156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SH Giordano AU Buzdar GN Hortobagyi (2002) ArticleTitleBreast cancer in men Ann Intern Med 137 678–687 Occurrence Handle12379069

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Cancer Society (2005) Cancer Facts and Figures, 2005 American Cancer Society Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parkin DM, Whelan Sl, Ferlay J et al. (eds) (1997) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. VII. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, IARC Science Publications No. 143

  5. WF Anderson MD Althuis LA Brinton SS Devesa (2004) ArticleTitleIs male breast cancer similar or different than female breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 83 77–86 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BREA.0000010701.08825.2d Occurrence Handle14997057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2004) United States Cancer Statistics: 2001 Incidence and Mortality Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute Atlanta (GA)

    Google Scholar 

  7. K Gwyn ML Bondy DS Cohen et al. (2004) ArticleTitleRacial differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical delays in a population-based study of patients with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma Cancer 100 1595–1604 Occurrence Handle10.1002/cncr.20169 Occurrence Handle15073845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howe HL, Chen VW, Hotes J, Wu XC, Correa C, Fulton JP (eds) (2001) Cancer Incidence in North America 1994–1998, Vol. 1: Incidence. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries

  9. NAACCR (2003). Report of the NAACCR Expert Panel on Hispanic Identification 2003. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Also available from URL http://www.naaccr.org, 2004

  10. C Percy V Holten ParticleVan C Muir (Eds) (1990) International Classification of Disease for Oncology EditionNumber2 World Health Organization Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shambaugh EM, Weiss MA (eds) (1977) Summary Staging Guide. Cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Reporting, SEER Program April 1977. NIH Publication No. 98–2313. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute

  12. US Census Bureau. United States Census 2000. Also available from URL: http://www.census.gov/population/www/ [accessed 2004, September 3], 2004

  13. SEER*Stat 2001. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, Also available from URL: http://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat [accessed 2003, January13], 2003

  14. MP Fay EJ Feuer (1997) ArticleTitleConfidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution Stat Med 16 791–801 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2sfkvFE%3D Occurrence Handle9131766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A Agresti (2002) Categorical Data Analysis EditionNumber2 Wiley Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  16. DB Thomas LM Jimenez A McTiernan et al. (1992) ArticleTitleBreast cancer in men: risk factors with hormonal implications Am J Epidemiol 135 734–748 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B1c%2FnvVU%3D Occurrence Handle1350708

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson KC, Pan S, Mao Y, Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Group (2002) Risk factors for male breast cancer in Canada, 1994–1998. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  18. AJ Sasco AB Lowenfels P Pasker-de-Jong (1993) ArticleTitleReview article: epidemiology of male breast cancer. A meta-analysis of published case-control studies and discussion of selected aetiological factors Int J Cancer 53 538–549 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2s%2Fpt1E%3D Occurrence Handle8436428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JT Casagrande R Hanisch MC Pike et al. (1988) ArticleTitleA case-control study of male breast cancer Cancer Res 48 1326–1330 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC3srmsFw%3D Occurrence Handle3342411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M Ewertz L Holmberg S Tretli BV Pedersen A Kristensen (2001) ArticleTitleRisk factors for male breast cancer – a case-control study from Scandinavia Acta Oncol 40 467–471 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvlvVGnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11504305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. AW Hsing JK McLaughlin P Cocco HT Co Chien JF Fraumeni SuffixJr (1998) ArticleTitleRisk factors for male breast cancer (United States) Cancer Causes Control 9 269–275 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008869003012 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czkslynuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9684707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DS Willoughby L Taylor (2004) ArticleTitleEffects of sequential bouts of resistance exercise on androgen receptor expression Med Sci Sports Exerc 36 1499–1506 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnt12itr4%3D Occurrence Handle15354030

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. LA Brinton J Benichou MD Gammon et al. (1997) ArticleTitleEthnicity and variation in breast cancer incidence Int J Cancer 73 349–355 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971104)73:3<349::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-# Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fit1Cguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9359481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. BF Hankey B Miller R Curtis et al. (1994) ArticleTitleTrends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast to older women J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 16 7–14 Occurrence Handle7999473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. RK Ross MC Pike GA Coetzee JK Reichardt MC Yu et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAndrogen metabolism and prostate cancer: establishing a model of genetic susceptibility Cancer Res 58 4497–4504 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmslWrsr4%3D Occurrence Handle9788589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. WL Donegan PN Redlich PJ Lang MT Gall (1998) ArticleTitleCarcinoma of the breast in males: a multiinstitutional survey Cancer 83 498–509 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980801)83:3<498::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-R Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czlt1ymsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9690543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. C Thellenberg B Malmer B Tavelin H Gronberg (2003) ArticleTitleSecond primary cancers in men with prostate cancer: an increased risk of male breast cancer J Urol 169 1345–1348 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.ju.0000056706.88960.7c Occurrence Handle12629357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. SC Lee RJ Ellis (2004) ArticleTitleMale breast cancer during finasteride therapy J Natl Cancer Inst 96 338–339 Occurrence Handle14970289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. JD McConnell CG Roehrborn OM Bautista GL Andriole SuffixJr CM Dixon JW Kusek et al. (2003) ArticleTitleThe long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy, on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hypertrophy N Engl J Med 349 2387–2398 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa030656 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpvFGqt7s%3D Occurrence Handle14681504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DE Henson KC Chu PH Levine (2003) ArticleTitleHistologic grade, stage, and survival in breast carcinoma: comparison of African American and Caucasian women Cancer 98 908–917 Occurrence Handle12942556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. H Stalsberg DB Thomas KA Rosenblatt et al. (1993) ArticleTitleHistologic types and hormone receptors in breast cancer in men: a population-based study in 282 United States men Cancer Causes Control 4 143–151 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00053155 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2cvjvFw%3D Occurrence Handle8386948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. HL Carmalt LJ Mann CW Kennedy JM Fletcher DJ Gillett (1998) ArticleTitleCarcinoma of the male breast: a review and recommendations for management Aust N Z J Surg 68 712–715 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjvFGnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9768607

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. PE Goss C Reid M Pintilie R Lim N Miller (1999) ArticleTitleMale breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955–1996 Cancer 85 629–639 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<629::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-V Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ptVWmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10091736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. R Hultborn C Hanson I Kopf L Verbiene E Warnhammar A Weimarck (1997) ArticleTitlePrevalence of Klinefelter’s syndrome in male breast cancer patients Anticancer Res 7 4293–4298

    Google Scholar 

  35. CI Perkins J Hotes BA Kohler HL Howe (2004) ArticleTitleAssociation between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994–1998 Cancer Cause Control 15 637–645

    Google Scholar 

  36. HA Weiss SS Devesa LA Brinton (1996) ArticleTitleLaterality of breast cancer in the United States Cancer Cause Control 7 539–543 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3s7ht1I%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. RT Senie AF Saftlas LA Brinton RN Hoover (1993) ArticleTitleIs breast cancer size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor? Cancer Cause Control 4 203–208 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA3cros1A%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. DJ Smith WE Palin VL Katch JE Bennet (1986) ArticleTitleBreast volume and anthropometric measurements: normal values Plat Reconstr Surg 78 331–335

    Google Scholar 

  39. R Ing JHC Ho NI Petrakis (1977) ArticleTitleUnilateral breast-feeding and breast cancer Lancet 2 124–127 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSiB3M7ls1w%3D Occurrence Handle69205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Malley C, Hu KU, West DW (2002) North American Association of Central Cancer Registries: race and ethnicity identifier assessment project. Also available from URL http://www. naaccr.org

  41. LN Kolonel MT Goodman (1992) ArticleTitleRacial variation in cancer: fact or artifact? J Natl Cancer Inst 84 916–917

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under cooperative agreement U75/CCU515998 to the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program under contract N01-CN-67001 from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Goodman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, M.T., Tung, KH. & Wilkens, L.R. Comparative Epidemiology of Breast Cancer Among Men and Women in the US, 1996 to 2000. Cancer Causes Control 17, 127–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-5384-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-5384-y

Keywords

Navigation