Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Can we trust cancer information on the Internet? – A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the prevalence and quality of interactive cancer risk sites on the Internet.

Methods:A cancer risk site was defined as a website that gave an estimate of the individual risk of developing cancer. Six search engines and one Meta crawler were used to search the Internet for cancer risk sites (including breast, prostate, colon, and lung cancer). A set of defined quality criteria for health related websites was used to evaluate the websites during 2001 and 2002.

Results:The number of cancer risk sites, as defined above, increased by 50% between 2001 and 2002. Only two out of 22 cancer risk sites fulfilled the quality criteria adequately. No signs of a change in trend (with regard to the quality criteria met) were noted in January 2005

Conclusions:The overall quality of the documentation on the cancer risk sites was poor and no improvement was seen during the study period. The majority of the cancer risk sites do not give reliable risk estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cyberchondriacs Update The Harris Poll # 19. 2001 [cited 2004; Available from: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=229

  2. Pastore M The Mess Known as Online Healthcare. 2000 [cited 2004; Available from: http://cyberatlas.internet.com/big_picture/demographics/article/0,1323, 5971_379231,00.html

  3. G Eysenbach ER Sa TL Diepgen (1999) ArticleTitleShopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine BMJ 319 1294 Occurrence Handle10559047

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox S, Rainie L Vital decisions. How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick 2002 Pew Internet and American Life Project; May 22

  5. X Chen LL Siu (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada J Clin Oncol 19 4291–4297 Occurrence Handle11731511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox S, Fallows D (2003) Internet Health Resources. Health searchers and e-mailing have become commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 16 July

  7. 4-Country Survey Finds Most Cyberchondriacs Believe Online Health Care Information Is Trustworthy, Easy to Find and Understand. 2002 [cited; Available from: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp? NewsID=464

  8. Evolution of Internet use for health purposes. 2001 [cited 2004 January 13]; Available from: http://www.hon.ch/Survey/FebMar2001/survey.html

  9. GK Berland MN Elliott LS Morales et al. (2001) ArticleTitleHealth information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish Jama 285 2612–2621 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.285.20.2612 Occurrence Handle11368735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JSGGJ Biermann MLVH Greenfield L Baker (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluation of cancer information on the Internet Cancer 86 381–390 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<381::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P Impicciatore C Pandolfini N Casella M Bonati (1997) ArticleTitleReliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home BMJ 314 1875 Occurrence Handle9224132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. CT Lee CA Smith JM Hall WB Waters JS Biermann (2003) ArticleTitleBladder cancer facts: accuracy of information on the Internet J Urol 170 1756–1760 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.ju.0000092696.20128.9b Occurrence Handle14532770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. JW Allen RJ Finch MG Coleman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe poor quality of information about laparoscopy on the world wide web as indexed by popular search engines Surg Endosc 16 170–172 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-0054-y Occurrence Handle11961632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. F Meric EV Bernstam NQ Mirza et al. (2002) ArticleTitleBreast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites Bmj 324 577–581 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577 Occurrence Handle11884322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fox S, Rainie L (2000) The online health care revolution: how the web help Americans take better care of themselves. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 26 November

  16. SD Weisbord JB Soule PL Kimmel (1997) ArticleTitlePoison on line – acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the Internet N Engl J Med 337 825–827 Occurrence Handle9297113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Internet Health Coalition. [cited; Available from: http://www.ihealthcoalition.org

  18. DISCERN. [cited; Available from: http://www.discern.org.uk

  19. HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. 1997 April 23 2003 [cited; Available from: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html

  20. Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites. 23/06/2003 [cited; Available from: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/ehealth/quality/draft_guidelines/index_e n.htm

  21. G Eysenbach TL Diepgen JAM Gray et al. (1998) ArticleTitleTowards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information BMJ 317 1496–1502 Occurrence Handle9831581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M Benigeri P Pluye (2003) ArticleTitleShortcomings of health information on the Internet Health Promot Int 18 381–386 Occurrence Handle10.1093/heapro/dag409 Occurrence Handle14695369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. AR Jadad A Gagliardi (1998) ArticleTitleRating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to babel JAMA 279 611–614 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.279.8.611 Occurrence Handle9486757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. JA Diaz RA Griffith JJ Ng et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePatients’ use of the internet for medical information J Gen Intern Med 17 180–185 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x Occurrence Handle11929503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. GLOBOCAN 2000 Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide Version 1.0. 2001 [cited 2004; Available from:

  26. Hälsa på Internet – En granskning av svenska webbplatser 2002: Swedish National Board of Health and Wealfare. Report No.: ISBN:91-7201-659-0

  27. S Lawrence CL Giles (1998) ArticleTitleSearching the world wide web Science 280 98–100 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.280.5360.98 Occurrence Handle9525866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. D Fallis M Fricke (2002) ArticleTitleIndicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet: a study of indicators relating to information for managing fever in children in the home J Am Med Inform Assoc 9 73–79 Occurrence Handle10.1197/jamia.M1131 Occurrence Handle11751805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. al KSJe Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines 2003: NCI in the U.S Department of Health and Human Services

  30. Shon J, Musen MA (1999) The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the world wide web. Proc AMIA Symp: 945–949

  31. A Risk C Petersen (2002) ArticleTitleHealth information on the internet: quality issues and international initiatives JAMA 287 2713–2715 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.287.20.2713 Occurrence Handle12020308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden

    Alexandra Ekman, Per Hall & Jan-Eric Litton

Authors
  1. Alexandra Ekman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Per Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan-Eric Litton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Ekman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekman, A., Hall, P. & Litton, JE. Can we trust cancer information on the Internet? – A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites. Cancer Causes Control 16, 765–772 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-1722-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-1722-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation