Skip to main content
Log in

Using Data to Motivate Action: The Need for High Quality, an Effective Presentation, and an Action Context for Decision-making

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three common barriers to the effective use of data to inform decisions and motivate action for the planning of cancer control are (1) failure to recognize the availability of high-quality data, (2) not presenting the data in a compelling format, and (3) failing to place the data in a historical and action context. Overcoming these barriers will go a long way toward demonstrating that high-quality data can be used to accomplish the desired outcomes in a Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) program. The article identifies existing sources of high-quality data, provides examples of effective presentation, and discusses successes in using data for program planning and implementation. The paper is not meant to provide a comprehensive discussion of using data for decision making, instead providing options to help key CCC stakeholders improve the effectiveness of their decisions as CCC plans are developed and implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine, Modifying health risk behaviors. In: Curry SJ, Byers T, Hewitt M, eds. Fulfilling The Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp. 87–155.

  2. JF Sallis N Owen (1997) Ecological models K Glanz FM Lewis B Rimer (Eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice EditionNumber2 Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco 403–424

    Google Scholar 

  3. SJ Curry T Byers M Hewitt (Eds) (2003) Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection National Academies Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention (1997) Summary. Cancer Causes Control 8(suppl 1): S50.

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2005) Comprehensive Cancer Control. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/bb_cancer/index.htm.

  6. M Siegel (2002) ArticleTitleThe effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: a review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes Annu Rev Public Health 23 45–71 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092601.095916 Occurrence Handle11910054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A Jemal LX Clegg E Ward et al. (2004) ArticleTitleAnnual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival Cancer 101 3–27 Occurrence Handle15221985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koh HK, Judge CM, Robbins H, Celebucki CC, Walker DK, Connolly GN. The first decade of the Massachusetts tobacco control program. Public Health Rep. In press.

  9. PA Wingo HL Howe MJ Thun et al. (2005) ArticleTitleA national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States Cancer Causes Control 16 151–170 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10552-004-3487-5 Occurrence Handle15868456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ries LAG, Eisner MP Kosary CL, et al (2004) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 19752001. Retrieved November 23, 2004, from http://www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2001.

  11. Cancer Registries Amendment Act, Pub. L. 102–515, 106 Stat. 3372 (Oct. 24, 1992) Retrieved January 26, 2005, from www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/npcrpdfs/publaw.pdf).

  12. NAACCR Goals and Objectives, 2001–2005 (2004). Retrieved December 6, 2004, from http://www.naaccr.org/filesystem/pdf/goalsandobjectives201–2005.PDF.

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (2005) Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/.

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2005) Cancer Prevention and Control, National Program of Cancer Registries. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/uscs/.

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2005) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/bb_brfss_yrbss/index.htm#brfss.

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (2005) Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/bb_brfss_yrbss/index. htm#yrbss.

  17. American Cancer Society, Cancer Action Network (2005) The Legislative Action Center. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://capwiz.com/acs-national/home/.

  18. National Cancer Institute (2005) State Cancer Legislative Database Program. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.scld-nci.net/.

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System (STATE). Retrieved March 22, 2005, from http://www.apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/.

  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Retrieved March 22, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/.

  21. American Cancer Society (2004) Behavioral Research Center. Current research underway. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.

  22. National Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Prevention, Cancer Survivorship Research. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/.

  23. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Center for Health Information, Statistics, Research, and Evaluation, Massachusetts Cancer Registry (2005) Cancer incidence in Massachusetts 19962000: City and Town Supplement. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.mass.gov/dph/bhsre/mcr/00/supplement/citytown1996_2000.htm.

  24. New York State Department of Health, New York Cancer Registry (2005) Cancer Data for New York City Neighborhoods. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/cancer/nyscr/vol1n.htm.

  25. California Department of Health Services, California Cancer Registry (2005) Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.ccrcal.org/Publications.html#Anchor-Reportin-61440.

  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2005). SMART: Selected Metropolitan/Micropolitan Area Risk Trends. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss-smart/index.asp.

  27. American Cancer Society (2004) Community Assessment ETool. Version 3.0 CD ROM – released December 2004. Note: The Community Assessment ETool will soon be a Web-based tool accessible via http://www.cancerplan.org.

  28. Cancer Control PLANET: Plan, Link, Act, Network with Evidence-based Tools (2005) Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/.

  29. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Cancer Society (2005) Cancer Facts & Figures American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  30. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Cancer Society (2005) Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts & Figures American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  31. Massachusetts community health information profile (MassCHIP). MassCHIP v3.0 r310.0. Copyright © 1995–2005 Massachusetts Department of Public Health – All Rights Reserved Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://masschip.state.ma.us/.

  32. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (2005). MICA – Missouri Information for Community Assessment. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.health.state.mo.us/MICA/nojava.html.

  33. American Cancer Society (2004) Ohio Cancer Facts & Figures 2004. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.cancer.org/docroot/COM/content/div_OH/COM_12x_OhioFactsFigures.asp?sitearea =COM.

  34. Professor Irving Selikoff as quoted in Global Action against Cancer (1992) Geneva: World Health Organization, International Union Against Cancer.

  35. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2005) Evaluation Working Group. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/eval/index.htm.

  36. InstitutionalAuthorNameMichigan Cancer Consortium Initiative (2004) The Cancer Burden in Michigan: Selected Statistics Michigan Public Health Institute Okemos, MI 20

    Google Scholar 

  37. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (2004) State cigarette excise tax rates & rankings. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/ pdf/0097.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce L. Black.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Cancer Society, or Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Black, B.L., Cowens-Alvarado, R., Gershman, S. et al. Using Data to Motivate Action: The Need for High Quality, an Effective Presentation, and an Action Context for Decision-making. Cancer Causes Control 16 (Suppl 1), 15–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0457-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0457-5

Key words

Navigation