Abstract
Objective: Population-based cancer registries provide an excellent source of data for cancer surveillance and research. However, delays in reporting and processing can affect the accuracy of incidence rates and the availability of cases for research. This study was designed to describe factors related to delays in availability of cancer cases for epidemiologic analysis.
Methods: We identified all cancer cases diagnosed in 2000 and reported to the California Cancer Registry by August 2004. We analyzed factors associated with time to availability, defined as the time from diagnosis until the time the case was available for research.
Results: A total of 137,270 cancer cases were reported during the study period. The median time to availability for all cases was 382 days. Forty-five percent of cases were available within the first 12 months and 96% were available within 24 months after diagnosis. Cases reported by hospitals had the shortest time to availability (373 days) followed by doctors’ offices and laboratories. Melanoma and prostate cancers had longer times to be available than other types of cancer. Time to availability varied by geographic region, but differences by age, gender, race and stage at diagnosis were minimal or non-significant.
Conclusion: Strategies are needed to improve timeliness without sacrificing quality and completeness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
JN Izquierdo VJ Schoenbach (2000) ArticleTitleThe potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries Am J Public Health 90 695–698 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3mtVajuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10800415
LX Clegg EJ Feuer DN Midthune MP Fay BF Hankey (2002) ArticleTitleImpact of reporting delay and reporting error on cancer incidence rates and trends J Natl Cancer Inst 94 1537–1545 Occurrence Handle12381706
C Morris R Cohen C Perkins et al. (2000) Cancer in California: 1988–1997 California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section; June, 2000 Sacramento, CA
InstitutionalAuthorNameCalifornia Department of Health Services (1995) Cancer Reporting in California: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals. California Cancer Reporting System Standards EditionNumber3 California Cancer Registry, Data Standards and Assessment Unit; August 1995 Sacramento, CA
C Percy V Van Holten C Muir (1990) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology EditionNumber2 World Health Organization England
Shambaugh E, Ries L, Young J,et al. (1992) SEER Extent of Disease — 1988 Codes and Coding Instructions. 2nd edn.
Seiffert J (1993) SEER Program: Comparative Staging Guide for Cancer, version 1.1: National Cancer Institute; June, 1993. Report No.: NIH Publication No. 93–3640.
D Collett (1999) Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research Chapman & Hall/CRC New York
L Penberthy D McClish A Pugh W Smith C Manning S Retchin (2003) ArticleTitleUsing hospital discharge files to enhance cancer surveillance Am J Epidemiol 158 27–34 Occurrence Handle12835284
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Gagen, J., Cress, R.D., Drake, C.M. et al. Factors associated with time to availability for cases reported to population-based cancer registries⋆. Cancer Causes Control 16, 449–454 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-004-5030-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-004-5030-0