Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 151–170 | Cite as

A national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States

  • Phyllis A. Wingo
  • Holly L. Howe
  • Michael J. Thun
  • Rachel Ballard-Barbash
  • Elizabeth Ward
  • Martin L. Brown
  • JoAnne Sylvester
  • Gilbert H. Friedell
  • Linda Alley
  • Julia H. Rowland
  • Brenda K. Edwards
Article

Abstract

Enhancements to cancer surveillance systems are needed for meeting increased demands for data and for developing effective program planning, evaluation, and research on cancer prevention and control. Representatives from the American Cancer Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Cancer Registrars Association, and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries have worked together on the National Coordinating Council for Cancer Surveillance to develop a national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States. The framework addresses a continuum of disease progression from a healthy state to the end of life and includes primary prevention (factors that increase or decrease cancer occurrence in healthy populations), secondary prevention (screening and diagnosis), and tertiary prevention (factors that affect treatment, survival, quality of life, and palliative care). The framework also addresses cross-cutting information needs, including better data to monitor disparities by measures of socioeconomic status, to assess economic costs and benefits of specific interventions for individuals and for society, and to study the relationship between disease and individual biologic factors, social policies, and the environment. Implementation of the framework will require long-term, extensive coordination and cooperation among these major cancer surveillance organizations.

Keywords

cancer surveillance surveillance incidence mortality survival cancer control survivorship quality of care quality of life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control2001Cancer registries: The Foundation for Cancer Prevention and Control. At-A-GlanceCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swan, J, Wingo, PA, Clive, R,  et al. 1998Cancer Surveillance in the U.S., can we have a national systemCancer8312821291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brownson, RC Remington, PL Davis, JR JR1998Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control2American Public Health AssociationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lengerich, EJ 1999Indicators for Chronic Disease Surveillance: Consensus of CSTE, ASTCDPD , and CDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Extramural Committee to Assess Measures of Progress Against Cancer.1990Measurement of progress against cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst82825835Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Best, A, Hiatt, RA, Cameron, R, Rimer, BK, Abrams, DB 2003The evolution of cancer control research: an international perspective from Canada and the United StatesCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.12705712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alciati, MH, Glanz, K 1996Using data to plan public health programs: experience from state cancer prevention and control programsPublic Health Rep.111165172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haynes, MA, Smedley, BD 1999The Unequal Burden of Cancer: An Assessment of NIH Research and Programs for Ethnic Minorities and the Medically UnderservedNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kagawa-Singer, M 1999Report of the ad hoc working group on cancer surveillance and data systems, November 14–15Intercultural Cancer CouncilHouston, TXGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hewitt, M, Simone, JV 1999Ensuring Quality Cancer CareNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hewitt, M, Simone, JV 2000Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer CareNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Cancer Institute, Surveillance Implementation Group (1999) Cancer Surveillance Research Implementation Plan. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/DCCPS/SIG/Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Surveillance Branch (1999) National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS), Rationale and Approach . Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/npcr-css.htmGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Intercultural Cancer Council (1999) Report of ad hoc working group on cancer surveillance and data systems November 14–15. Houston, TX: Intercultural Cancer CouncilGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singer, BH, Ryff, CD 1999New Horizons in Health: An Integrative ApproachWashington DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smedley, BD, Syme, SL 2001Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral ResearchNational Academy PressWashington, DC149166Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2000) AHRQ Leading effort to develop a national report on health care quality. Rockville, MD. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/press/pr2000/natreppr.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown, ML, Hodgson, TA, Rice, DP 1996

    Economic impact of cancer in the United States

    Schottenfeld, DFraumeni, JF,Jr eds. Cancer Epidemiology and PreventionOxford UniversityNew York, NY
    Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown, ML, Lipscomb, J, Snyder, C. 2001The burden of illness of cancer: economic cost and quality of lifeAnnual Rev Public Health.2291113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warren, JL, Klabunde, CN, Schrag, D, Bach, PB, Riley, GF 2002Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly populationMed Care.40518Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mariotto, A, Warren, JL, Knopf, K, Feuer, EJ 2003The prevalence of patients with colorectal carcinoma under care in the U.S. Cancer9812561261Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shireman, TI, Tsevat, J, Goldie, SJ 2001Time costs associated with cervical cancer screeningInt J Tech Assess Health Care.17146152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frew, E, Wolstenholme, JL, Atkin, W, Whynes, DK 1999Estimating time and travel costs incurred in clinic based screeningJ Med Screen.6119123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barlow, WE, Taplin, SH, Yoshida, CK, Buist, DS, Seger, D, Brown, ML 2001A cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst.93455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brown, ML, Riley, GF, Schussler, N, Etzioni, R 2002Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare dataMed Care.40517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Cancer Institutes (2004) Health Services and Economics, Patterns of care/quality of care. Washington, DC. National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://healthservices.cancer.gov/surveys/pocGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bednarek, HL, Neumark, D 2002Breast cancer survival, work, and earningsJ Health Econ.21757779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorpe, KE, Howard, D 2003Health Insurance and spending among cancer patientsHealth Affairs.2212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slattery, ML, Potter, JD, Samowitz, W, Schaffer, D, Leppert, M 1999Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, diet, and risk of colon cancerCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.8513518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jemal, A, Graubard, BI, Devesa, SS, Flegal, KM 2002The association of blood lead level and cancer mortality among whites in the United StatesEnviron Health Perspect.110325329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saydah, SH, Loria, CM, Eberhardt, MS, Brancati, FL 2003Abnormal glucose tolerance and the risk of cancer death in the United StatesAm J Epidemiol.15710921100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yong, LC, Brown, CC, Schatzkin, A,  et al. 1997Intake of vitamins E, C, and A and risk of lung cancerThe NHANES I epidemiologic follow up study. First national health and nutrition examination survey. Am J Epidemiol.146231243Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Su, LJ, Arab, L 2001Nutritional status of folate and colon cancer risk: evidence from NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up studyAnn Epidemiol.116572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Laboratory Sciences (2003) Second National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals . Atlanta, GA: Investment in tobacco control, state highlights 2001. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking/tracking_network_workgroups_report.htmGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2003) Investment in Tobacco Control, State Highlights 2001 . Atlanta, GA. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/statehi/pdf 2001/2001statehighlights.pdfGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    TaskForceonCommunity Preventive, Services 2000Introducing the guide to community preventive services: methods, first recommendations and expert commentaryPrev Med181142Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ewing, R, Schmid, T, Killingsworth, R, Zlot, A, Raudenbush, S 2003Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidityAm J Health Promot.184757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pollard, T 2003Policy prescriptions for healthier communitiesAm J Health Promot.18109113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jackson, FJ 2003The impact of the build environment on Health: an emerging fieldAm J Public Health.9313821383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Engelman, KK, Hawley, DB, Gazaway, R, Mosier, MC, Ahluwalia, JS, Ellerbeck, EF 2002Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural womenJ Am Geriatr Soc.506268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Houn, F, Brown, ML 1994The current practice of screening mammography in the U.S.: data from the National Survey of Mammography FacilitiesRadiology.190209215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown, ML, Fintor, L 1994Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national surveyAm J Prev Med.10162167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Breen, NJ, Brown, ML 1994The price of mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography FacilitiesMilbank Q.72431450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Klabunde, CN, Frame, P, Jones, E, Meadow, A, Nadel, M, Vernon, S 2003A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practicesPrev Med.36352362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brown, ML, Klabunde, CN, Mysliwiec, P 2003Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening PracticesAm J Med.115129133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sandbury, LB, Klabunde, CN, Mysliwiec, P, Brown, ML 2003Physicians’ use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screeningAm J Prev Med.25179186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Klabunde, CN, Jones, E, Brown, ML, Davis, WW 2002Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: a national survey of diagnostic radiologistsAM J Roentgenol.17914191427Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    American Cancer Society.19901989 survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detectionCA Cancer J Clin.4077101Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Freedman, AN, Wideroff, L, Olson, L,  et al. 2003US physicians’ attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibilityAm J Med Genet.1206371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wideroff, L, Freedman, AN, Olson, L,  et al. 2003Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national surveyCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.12295303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ballard-Barbash, R, Taplin, SH, Yankaskas, BC,  et al. 1997Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes databaseAM J Roentgenol.16910011008Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Howe, HL, Edwards, BK, Young, JL,  et al. 2003The vision for cancer incidence within a comprehensive cancer surveillance frameworkCancer Causes Control.14663672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rigotti, NA, Quinn, VP, Stevens, VJ, Solberg, LI 2002Tobacco-control policies in 11 leading managed care organizations: progress and challengesEffect Clini Prac.5130136Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Solberg, LI, Hollis, JA, Stevens, VJ, Rigotti, NA, Quinn, VP, Aickin, M 2003Does methodology affect the ability to monitor tobacco control activities?Implications for HEDIS and other performance measures. Prev Med.373340Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    *55. Commission on Cancer (COC) (2004). Chicago, IL. Available from: http://www.facs.org/cancer/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    National Cancer Registrars Association (NCRA) (2004) Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.ncra-usa.org/certification/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tucker, TC, Howe, HL, Weir, HK 1999Certification of population-based cancer registriesJ Reg Manage.262427Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tucker, TC, Howe, HL 2001Measuring the quality of central cancer registries: the NAACCR perspectiveJ Reg Manage.284144Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)2000Standards for Cancer Registries. Standards for Completeness, Quality, Analysis and Management of DataNAACCRSpringfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hutton, MD, Simpson, LD, Miller, DS, Weir, HK, McDavid, K, Hall, HI 2001Progress toward nationwide cancer surveillance: an evaluation of the National Program of Cancer Registries, 1994-1999J Reg Manage.28113120Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wingo, PA, Jamison, PM, Hiatt, RA,  et al. 2003Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control–a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States)Cancer Causes Control.14175193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ries LA, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al. (2004) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2001. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://seer.cancer.cancer.gov/csr/1975–2001Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2003) United States cancer statistics: 2000 Incidence. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/uscsGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Edwards, BK, Howe, HL, Ries, LAG,  et al. 2002Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burdenCancer.9427662792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bland KI, Menck HR, Partridge E, et al. (2000). The national cancer data base: what does it mean to the community surgeon?. J Surg Oncol. 73: 189–191Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stewart AK, Bland KI, McGinnis LS Jr., Morrow M, Eyre HJ (2000) Clinical highlights from the national cancer data base, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin. 50: 171–183Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Surveillance Branch (2003) Breast, colon and prostate cancer data quality and patterns of care study. Atlanda GA. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/pocstudy.htmlGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Potosky, AL, Harlan, LC, Stanford, JL 1999Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes StudyJ Natl Cancer Inst.9117191724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rowland J, Mariotta A, Aziz N, et al. (2004) Cancer Survivorship – United States, 1971–2001. MMWR 53Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Shimozuma, K 2002Quality of life assessmentBreast Cancer.9100106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Johnson, JR, Williams, G, Pasdur, R 2003Endpoints and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugsJ Clin Oncol.2114041411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    King, CR, Haberman, M, Berry, DL,  et al. 1997Quality of life and the cancer experience: the state-of-the-knowledgeOncol Nurs Forum.242741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dean, H 1997Multiple instruments for measuring quality of life. Instruments for Clinical Health-Care ResearchJones and Bartlett PublishersSudbury, Mass135148Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Testa, MA, Simonson, DC 1996Assesment of quality-of-life outcomesN Engl J Med.334835840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rummans, TA, Bostwick, JM, Clark, MM 2000Maintaining quality of life at the end of lifeMayo Clin Proc.7513051310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Soni, MK, Cella, D 2002Quality of life and symptom measures in oncology: an overviewAm J Manag Care.8S560S573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cella, DF, Bonomi, AE 1995Measuring quality of life: 1995 updateOncology (Huntington).94760Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Robison, LL, Mertens, AC, Boice, JD,  et al. 2002Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative projectMed Pediatr Oncol.38229239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Robison, LL, Bhatia, S 2003Late-effects among survivors of leukaemia and lymphoma during childhood and adolescenceBr J Haematol.122345359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bhatia, S, Yasui, Y, Robison, LL,  et al. 2003High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report from the Late Effects Study GroupJ Clin Oncol.2143864394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    American Cancer Society (2003) Behavioral Research Center.␣Study of Cancer Survivors-II (SCS-II). Atlanda, GA. Available␣from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/RES/content/RES_9_1_BRC_Survivorship_Research.asp?sitearea=RESGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Baker, F, Haffer, SC, Denniston, M 2003Health-related quality of life of cancer and noncancer patients in Medicare managed careCancer.97674681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hewitt, M, Breen, N, Devesa, S 1999Cancer prevalence and survivorship issues: analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview SurveyJ Natl Cancer Inst.9114801486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hewitt, M, Rowland, JH 2002Mental health service use among adult cancer survivors: analyses of the National Health Interview SurveyJ Clin Oncol.2045814590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hewitt, M, Rowland, JH, Yancik, R 2003Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disabilityJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.588291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yabroff KR, Lawrence L, Clauser S, Davis W, Brown M (2004) Burden of illness in cancer survivors. Findings from a population-based national sample. J Natl Cancer Inst, In PressGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Colditz, GA 1995The nurses’ health study: a cohort of US women followed since 1976J Am Med Womens Assoc.504044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Holmes, MD, Kroenke, CH 2004Beyond treatment: lifestyle choices after breast cancer to enhance quality of life and survivalWomens Health Issues.141113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Earle, CC, Nattinger, AB, Potosky, AL,  et al. 2002Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare dataMed Care.40581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schottenfeld, D 1996

    Multiple primary cancers

    In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumen J.Oxford University Press. pp. 1370–1387F. New YorkOxford University Presspp 13701387
    Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Begg, CB, Zhang, ZF, Sun, M, Herr, HW, Schantz, SP 1995Methodology for evaluating the incidence of second primary cancers with application to smoking-related cancers from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programAm J Epidemiol.142653665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Li, CI, Rossing, MA, Voigt, LF, Daling, JR 2000Multiple primary breast and thyroid cancers: role of age at diagnosis and cancer treatments (United States)Cancer Causes Control.11805811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Flannery, JT, Boice, JD,Jr, Devesa, SS, Kleinerman, RA, Curtis, RE, Fraumeni, JF,Jr 1985Cancer registration in Connecticut and the study of multiple primary cancers, 1935–1982Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.681324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Howe HL (2003) A Review of the Definition for Multiple Primary Cancers in the United States. Workshop proceedings from December 4–6, 2002, Princeton, New Jersey. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer RegistriesGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Boice, JD,Jr, Curtis, RE, Kleinerman, RA, Flannery, JT, Fraumeni, JF,Jr 1986Multiple primary cancers in Connecticut, 1935-82Yale J Biol Med.59533545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Clegg, LX, Li, FP, Hankey, BF, Chu, K, Edwards, BK 2002Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based studyArch Intern Med.16219851993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Cronin K, Feuer E, Wesley M, Mariotto A, Scoppa S, Green D (2004) Current estimates for 5 and 10 year relative survival. Available from: http://www.srab.cancer.gov/reports/tech20 03.04. pdfGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Boer R, Ries LA, van Ballegooijen M, Feuer E, Legler J, Habbema D (2004) Ambiguities in calculating cancer patient survival: The SEER experience for colorectal and prostate cancer. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://www.srab.cancer.gov/reports/tech2003.05.pdfGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    National Cancer Institute (2003) Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Outcomes Research. Quality of Cancer Care Committee. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://outcomes.cancer.govGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    The National Forum for Health Care Quality Measurement and Reporting. NQF Project Brief (2002) Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association1996Good care of the dyingJAMA.275474478Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    American Cancer Society (2004) Cancer facts and figures 2004. Atlanta, GA. Available from: http://www.cancer.orgGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Fowler, FJ,Jr, Coppola, KM, Teno, JM 1999Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of lifeJ Pain Symptom Manage.17114119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Singer, PA, Martin, DK, Kelner, M 1999Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectivesJAMA.281163168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Stewart, AL, Teno, J, Patrick, DL, Lynn, J 1999The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health careJ Pain Symptom Manage.1793108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1994) Clinical practice guidelines. management of cancer pain . Rockville, MD. Available from: http://www.ahcpr.govGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Report of the WHO Expert Committee on Cancer Pain Relief and Active Supportive Care (1996) Cancer Pain Relief with a Guide to Opioid Availability , 2nd ed. Geneva: Technical Report Series 804Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Carver, AC, Foley, KM 2003

    Management of Cancer Pain

    Holland, JFFrei, E eds. Cancer MedicineThe National Academies PressHamilton, London: BC Decker Inc.
    Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Cleeland, CS, Gonin, R, Hatfield, AK,  et al. 1994Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancerN Engl J Med.330592596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    National Center for Health Statistics (2003) Vital statistics of the United States, 1950–1998, mortality, parts A and B. Public Health Service, 1954–2000Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    McCarthy, EP, Burns, RB, Ngo-Metzger, Q, Davis, RB, Phillips, RS 2003Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancerJAMA.28922382245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Lacknan, NA, Freeman, JL, Goodwin, JS 2003Hospice use by older women dying with breast cancer between 1991 and 1996J Palliat Care.194953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    McCarthy, EP, Burns, RB, Davis, RB, Phillips, RS 2003Barriers to hospice care among older patients dying with lung and colorectal cancerJ Clin Oncol.21728735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Ngo-Metzger, Q, McCarthy, EP, Burns, RB, Davis, RB, Li, FP, Phillips, RS 2003Older Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders dying of cancer use hospice less frequently than older white patientsAm J Med.1154753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Lunney JR, Foley KM, Smith TJ, Gelband H (2003) Executive SUMMARY – Describing Death in America: What We Need to Know . Washington, DC: National Cancer Policy Board and Division of Earth and Life Studies. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National AcademiesGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    National Center for Health Statistics (1967) Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, Adapted for Use in the United States, Eighth Revision . Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Pub. No. 1693Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    World Health Organization (1977) Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, Based on the Recommendations of the Ninth Revision, Conference, 1975. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Cintron, A, Hamel, MB, Davis, RB, Burns, RB, Phillips, RS, McCarthy, EP 2003Hospitalization of hospice patients with cancerJ Palliat Med.6757768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Teno, JM 2001

    Quality of care and quality indicators for end-of-life cancer care: hope for the best, yet prepare for the worst. Institute of Medicine

    Foley, KMGelband, H eds. Improving Palliative Care for CancerNational Research CouncilWashington, DC
    Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Foley, KM, Gelbrand, H 2001Improving Palliative Care for CancerInstitute of Medicine, National Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Hankey, BF, Ries, LA, Edwards, BK 1999The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resourceCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.811171121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Byers, T, Mouchawar, J, Marks, J,  et al. 1999The American Cancer Society challenge goalsHow far can cancer rates decline in the U.S. by the year2015715727Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Hiatt, RA, Rimer, BK 1999A new strategy for cancer control researchCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.8957964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Thacker, SB, Stroup, DF 1994Future directions for comprehensive public health surveillance and health information systems in the United StatesAm J Epidemiol.140383397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Fry, WA, Menck, HR, Winchester, DP 1996The National Cancer Data Base report on lung cancerCancer.7719471955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Jones, GW, Mettlin, C, Murphy, GP,  et al. 1995Patterns of care for carcinoma of the prostate gland: results of a national survey of 1984 and 1990J Am Coll Surg.180545554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Winchester, DP, Menck, HR, Osteen, RT, Kraybill, W 1995Treatment trends for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastAnn Surg Oncol.2207213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Beart, RW, Steele, GD,Jr, Menck, HR, Chmiel, JS, Ocwieja, KE, Winchester, DP 1995Management and survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a national survey of the Commission on CancerJ Am Coll Surg.181225236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Shah, JP, Karnell, LH, Hoffman, HT,  et al. 1997Patterns of care for cancer of the larynx in the United StatesArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.123475483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Hundahl, SA, Cady, B, Cunningham, MP,  et al. 2000Initial results from a prospective cohort study of 5583 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the United States during 1996 U.S. and German Thyroid Cancer Study Group. An American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Patient Care Evaluation studyCancer89202217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Daly, JM, Fry, WA, Little, AG,  et al. 2000Esophageal cancer: results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation StudyJ Am Coll Surg.190562572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Janes RH, J, Niederhuber, JE, Chmiel, JS,  et al. 1996National patterns of care for pancreatic cancerResults of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg.223261272Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Howe, HL, Katterhagen, JG, Yates, J, Lehnherr, M 1992Urban-rural differences in the management of breast cancerCancer Causes Control.3533539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ayanian, JZ, Zaslavsky, AM, Fuchs, CS,  et al. 2003Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohortJ Clin Oncol.2112931300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Cress, RD, Zaslavsky, AM, West, DW, Wolf, RE, Felter, MC, Ayanian, JZ 2003Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registriesMed Care.4110061012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Wingo, PA, Luke, E, O’Brien, K,  et al. 2001Population-based patterns of care studies: Collaboration among State cancer registries, the American College of Surgeons, and the American Cancer SocietyJ Reg Manage.28515Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Himmelman AT, Herman MS (1994) Communities working collaboratively for a change. In: Resolving Conflicts: Strategies for Local Government . Washington, DC: International City/County Management AssociationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phyllis A. Wingo
    • 1
  • Holly L. Howe
    • 2
  • Michael J. Thun
    • 3
  • Rachel Ballard-Barbash
    • 4
  • Elizabeth Ward
    • 3
  • Martin L. Brown
    • 4
  • JoAnne Sylvester
    • 5
  • Gilbert H. Friedell
    • 6
  • Linda Alley
    • 1
  • Julia H. Rowland
    • 4
  • Brenda K. Edwards
    • 4
  1. 1.Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta
  2. 2.North American Association of Central Cancer RegistriesSpringfield
  3. 3.American Cancer SocietyAtlanta
  4. 4.National Cancer InstituteBethesda
  5. 5.American College of SurgeonsChicago
  6. 6.Markey Cancer CenterUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations