Skip to main content
Log in

Doing Good and Doing Well? CSR Climate as a Driver of Team Empowerment and Team Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The establishment or nurturing of a supportive organizational climate encompasses various activities rooted in ethical commitments. This study focuses on the outcome of these activities, exploring how team members’ collective interpretation and evaluation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives’ presence and authenticity impact team empowerment as a driver of team performance. Drawing on the organizational climate literature, while integrating signaling theory and attribution theory, we hypothesize that the impact of CSR climate on team performance through team empowerment hinges on two key factors. First, teams must perceive the presence of CSR initiatives, denoting CSR climate quality. Secondly, there must be a consensus regarding the authenticity of these initiatives, signifying CSR climate strength. Results from a partial least squares—structural equation modeling analysis of multi-informant data obtained from 537 team members within 73 teams of 35 retail organizations in Belgium support most of our hypotheses. The results reveal that both CSR climate quality and strength are important drivers of team empowerment in support of team performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Notes

  1. Assessments of CSR climate quality and CSR climate strength, as well as their dimensionality and convergent validity are not reported in this section, as these team level variables are measured through average scores and within-group consensus scores (see supplementary material appendix A for a detailed explanation).

References

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Special Research Fund of Ghent University [BOF.PDO.2021.0046.01—BOF21/PDO/053] and [BOF.STG.2019.0090.01].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tom Kluijtmans: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Project administration. Kenn Meyfroodt: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Supervision. Saskia Crucke: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenn Meyfroodt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Research Involving Human Participants, Their Data or Biological Material

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ghent University Ethical Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 42 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kluijtmans, T., Meyfroodt, K. & Crucke, S. Doing Good and Doing Well? CSR Climate as a Driver of Team Empowerment and Team Performance. J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05678-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05678-z

Keywords

Navigation