Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transforming Relationships and Empowering Communities: The Role of Care Ethics in Solving Grand Challenges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine how actors who have no legislative authority over others are able to transform water management from a fragmented approach to a coordinated regional approach, by drawing on a longitudinal study of a regional water board in British Columbia, Canada. We found that the water board enacted an ethic of care to initiate and implement change to achieve water sustainability. Three caring processes operated in the initiating change period: leveraging a caring water ethic to amplify urgency, constructing care narratives to reduce resistance, and embedding care in organizational structures to demonstrate authenticity. Two caring processes operated in the implementing change period: enacting an ethic of care to transform relationships and valorizing a caring water ethic. We found that care within the social world (e.g., caring for others both in a community and in neighboring communities) led to better care for the biosphere world (e.g., water). This study contributes to the emerging organization scholarship on the ethics of care by examining the process through which care is enacted inside and outside (e.g., between interdependent actors) the organization and the consequences of the enactment of care (e.g., beyond the organization, field-level effects). We reorient care in organization scholarship not only as a response to suffering as commonly portrayed in extant literature, but also as a source of agency. From this, we discuss the potential of care ethics for finding innovative solutions to environmental sustainability, and grand challenges in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J. C. (2009). Constructing indigeneity: Syilx Okanagan oraliture and tmixwcentrism. PhD Thesis.

  • Armstrong, J., Derickson, D., Maracle, L., & Young-Ing, G. (1993). We get our living like milk from the land. Researched and compiled by the Okanagan Rights Committee and the Okanagan Indian Education Resource Society. Penticton, BC.

  • Atleo, E. R. (2007). Tsawalk: A Nuu-chah-nulth worldview. UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A. (1995). Moral prejudices: Essays on ethics. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (2011). Eau Canada: The future of Canada’s water. UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B., & Arjaliès, D.-L. (2021). Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis). Organization Theory, 2(4), 26317877211036710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2019). Sustainable development in an age of disruption. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the future by looking to the past - Examining research published on organizations and environment. Organization & Environment, 19(4), 458–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Hoffman, A. J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberá-Tomás, D., Castelló, I., De Bakker, F. G., & Zietsma, C. (2019). Energizing through visuals: How social entrepreneurs use emotion-symbolic work for social change. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1789–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastien, F., Coraiola, D. M., & Foster, W. M. (2022). Indigenous peoples and organization studies. Organization Studies, 44, 659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beacham, J. (2018). Organising food differently: Towards a more-than-human ethics of care for the Anthropocene. Organization, 25(4), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykin, A., & Schoenhofer, S. O. (2001). Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in Amj-part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2017). Qualitative methods II: ‘More-than-human’methodologies and/in praxis. Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., Gatrell, C., & Sutton, A. (2023). The case for paternalism at work: Balancing feminist care ethics and justice ethics through a winnicottian approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergene, S., Banerjee, S. B., & Hoffman, A. J. (2021). (Un)Sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1319–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G. H., & Zietsma, C. (2017). Constructing a shared governance logic: The role of emotions in enabling dually embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2321–2351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G. H. (2018). Winning hearts to achieve sustainability: Theorizing change from an emotional perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 13693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. J. (2007). Toxic emotions at work and what you can do about them. Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., & Liak, T. L. (2015). The management of natural resources: An overview and research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1595–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2019). Integrating care ethics and design thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (2004). Social policy and the ethic of care. UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkurinen, P., Clegg, S., Pinnington, A. H., Nicolopoulou, K., & Alcaraz, J. M. (2021). Managing the Anthropocene: Relational agency and power to respect planetary boundaries. Organization & Environment, 34(2), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J., & Jennings, P. D. (2018). Re-engaging with sustainability in the Anthropocene era: An institutional approach (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J. (2012). Revealing themes: Applying a positive lens to the chapters on environment and sustainability. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations (pp. 244–256). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J. (2021). Caring, courage and curiosity: Reflections on our roles as scholars in organizing for a sustainable future. Organization Theory, 2(1), 2631787721991143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. (1992). Critique and theory building: Producing knowledge “from the kitchen.” Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 582–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammaers, E. (2022). Theorizing discursive resistance to organizational ethics of care through a multi-stakeholder perspective on disability inclusion practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 183, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1993). Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 539–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. (2006). Editor’s comments: Publishing theory. Academy of Management Review, 3, 252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. N. N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care through narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machold, S., Ahmed, P. K., & Farquhar, S. S. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: A feminist perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Wolf, M., & Seelos, C. (2016). Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (2004). Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, J., & Berardi, A. (2016). Bridging indigenous and scientific knowledge. Science, 352(6291), 1274–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2020). A practical ethics of care: Tinkering with different ‘goods’ in residential nursing homes. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J., & Kurucz, E. (2019). Relational leadership for sustainability: Building an ethical framework from the moral theory of ‘ethics of care.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (Vol. 117, p. 27). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2009). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., Haugh, H. M., Hudon, M., & Meyer, C. (2020). Mapping concepts and issues in the ethics of the commons: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powley, E. H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations, 62(9), 1289–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1980). Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies, 6(2), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Margolis, J. D. (2012). Care and compassion through an organizational lens: Opening up new possibilities. Academy of Management Review, 37, 503–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam, M. G. (2013). Oral narratives, customary laws and Indigenous water rights in Canada (PhD Thesis). University of British Columbia Vancouver.

  • Sama, L. M., Welcomer, S. A., & Gerde, V. W. (2004). Who speaks for the trees? Invoking an ethic of care to give voice to the silent stakeholder. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment and society (pp. 140–165). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, B. (2018). The new automobility: Lyft, uber and the future of American cities. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://trid.trb.org/view/1527868

  • Seelos, C., Mair, J., & Traeger, C. (2022). The future of grand challenges research: Retiring a hopeful concept and endorsing research principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25, 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, S. (2003). The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory, 4(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simola, S. (2003). Ethics of justice and care in corporate crisis management. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. M. (2018). Introduction: Affective ecologies and conservation. Conservation and Society, 16(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: Towards a political ethic of care. Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (1987). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs, 12(4), 644–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (2010). Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayasingham, L., Jogulu, U., & Allotey, P. (2018). Enriching the organizational context of chronic illness experience through an ethics of care perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. R., & White, K. (2009). Water and development in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 3, 378–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. (2015). How similar are indigenous North American and Leopoldian environmental ethics? Available at SSRN 2022038.

  • Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., Lloyd, K., Suchet-Pearson, S., Burarrwanga, L., Tofa, M., & Country, B. (2012). Telling stories in, through and with Country: Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia. Journal of Cultural Geography, 29(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was partly funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace H. Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, G.H., Cunliffe, Z.A. Transforming Relationships and Empowering Communities: The Role of Care Ethics in Solving Grand Challenges. J Bus Ethics 191, 285–303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05491-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05491-0

Keywords

Navigation