Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Problem of Autonomy: An Alternative Notion of Excellence in Business Ethics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative concept of excellence in business, which builds upon the conventional notion of excellence as being in harmony with profit. Although the notion of an enduring harmony (or what we call the convergence thesis) between long-term profit and excellence is favoured by many thinkers, the premise neglects the disruptive force of the autonomous pursuit of excellence in theory and constrains it in practice. Further, autonomous excellence, a key condition of a genuine practice, is structurally weakened by the fact that businesses are heavily reliant on market approval to sustain themselves, irreversibly damaging their status as genuine practices. We argue that the autonomous pursuit of excellence requires not only recognizing but also actively strengthening a contingent relationship between internal and external goods, so that internal goods such as the excellence of the product can achieve maximum autonomy from the pressures of external goods. Such a risk-oriented approach may appear antagonistic to business but finds expression in the insight of key business visionaries such as Steve Jobs and Henry Ford that major technological advancements rarely find themselves in consonance with existing market standards and thus require a courageous break from 'market excellence'.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, M. Z. (2019). Evergreening of pharmaceutical patents: A blithe disregard for the rationale of the patent system. Journal of Generic Medicines, 15(2), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (2011). Remembering Steve jobs. Gpsolo, 28, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., Garvare, R., & Ahmad, N. (2011). Including sustainability in business excellence models. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 773–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2020). How disruptive are new urban technologies? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beabout, G. R. (2012). Management as a domain-relative practice that requires and develops practical wisdom. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R. (2008). Why business is not a practice. Analyse and Kritik, 30(1), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R. (2014). Ethics in Finance. Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (2013). Managing challenges in sustaining business excellence. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Santori, P. (2021). The Illusion of merit and the demons of economic meritocracy: Which are the legitimate expectations of the market? Journal of Business Ethics, 176(3), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2013). Disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & van Bever, D. (2016). The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., & Poras, J. I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, S., & Beadle, R. (2008). Could we know a practice-embodying institution if we saw one? Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, F., & Mathews, R. (2003). The Myth of Excellence: Why Great Companies Never Try to Be the Best at Everything. Three Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eräranta, K., Moisander, J., & Penttilä, V. (2019). Reflections on the marketization of art in contemporary neoliberal capitalism. In Museum marketization (pp. 19–33). Routledge.

  • Escrig, A. B., & de Menezes, L. M. (2015). What characterizes leading companies within business excellence models? An analysis of “EFQM recognized for excellence” recipients in Spain. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 362–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdowsian, M. C. (2016). Total business excellence: A new management model for operationalizing excellence. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(7), 942–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H., Crowther, S. & Woodrow Wilson Collection. (1922). My Life and Work., Page & Company

  • Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Ruiz, P., & Rodriguez-Lluesma, C. (2014). Consumption practices: A virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(4), 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (2013). The virtue approach to business ethics. In D. C. Russell (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to virtue ethics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K., & Hojrup, T. (2002). An economic rationale for inshore fishing: Simple commodity production and the life mode approach. In D. Symes (Ed.), Inshore fisheries management. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, J., Ruiz, C. D., & Peñaloza, L. (2020). Moments of luxury: Hedonic escapism as a luxury experience. Journal of Business Research, 116, 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., Kohli, A. K., & Sahay, A. (2000). Market-driven versus driving markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science., 28(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. (2020). Selling out: Culture. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lashinsky, A. (2012). Inside apple: How America’s most admired – and secretive —company really Works. Business Plus

  • Lawrence, K. (2022). Facebook’s new chapter: Rebranding to meta. SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, R., & Leeper, K. (2001). Public relations as practice: Applying the theory of Alasdair MacIntyre. Public Relations Review., 27(4), 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, V. (1993). Selling modernism: Resisting commodification, commodifying resistance. ESC, 19(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1988). Whose justice, which rationality? Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1999a). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1999b). How to seem virtuous without actually being so. In Education in morality, edited by J. Mark Halstead and Terence H. McLaughlin. Routledge

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2006a). The tasks of philosophy: Selected essays (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2006b). The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2016). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, D. P., & Brownsberger, M. L. (1990). Management as a social practice: Rethinking business ethics after MacIntyre. The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics, 10, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: Macintyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005a). Humanizing business: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005b). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2008). Re-Imagining the morality of management: a modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2012). Virtue in business: Alliance boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianezzi, D., Nørreklit, H., & Cinquini, L. (2019). Academia after virtue? An inquiry into the moral character(s) of academics. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L., & Tanner, S. (Eds.). (2004). Assessing business excellence. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puente, B. (2020). Muzzling the media: The perils of the critical press in the Philippines. Media Asia, 47(1–2), 81–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnicks, M. (2021). MacIntyre and business ethics. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A.J.G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (Eds.). (2018). Business ethics: A virtue ethics and common good approach. Routledge.

  • Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., Skoglund, W., & Laven, D. (2019). Craft beer–building social terroir through connecting people, place and business. Journal of Place Management and Development, 13(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, B. (2011). Business excellence models and the path ahead. The TQM Journal, 23(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, M., Mann, R., & Adebanjo, D. (2016). Deploying business excellence—success factors for high performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(2), 197–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, S. (2009). Rethinking agency: Persons and things in the heterotopia of ‘traditional Indian craft.’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(1), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, A. (2018). After virtue and accounting ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijaya, B. S., & Nasution, A. A. (2022). Social media, personal branding, and the hypoesthesia of communication corruption. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 2095095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zairi, M. (1992). The art of benchmarking: Using customer feedback to establish a performance gap. Total Quality Management, 3(2), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2014). Absolute Recoil: Towards A New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. Verso.

Download references

Funding

This project was partially funded by Indian Institute of Management Calcutta.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, D. H. Road, Joka, West Bengal, 700104, India

    Nisigandha Bhuyan

  2. Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, West Bengal, India

    Arunima Chakraborty

Authors
  1. Nisigandha Bhuyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arunima Chakraborty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nisigandha Bhuyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

No individual participants’ data/information is used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhuyan, N., Chakraborty, A. The Problem of Autonomy: An Alternative Notion of Excellence in Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 191, 253–267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05454-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05454-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation