Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) aspirations by companies have been identified as a motivating factor for active employee participation in CSR implementation. However, a failure to practise what one preaches can backfire and lead to attribution of hypocrisy. Drawing on a qualitative study of an award-winning sustainability pioneer in the cosmetics sector, we explore the role of moral judgement in how and when employees interpret word–deed misalignment in CSR implementation as hypocritical. First, our case reveals that high CSR aspirations by companies raise employees’ moral expectations. Second, we develop a framework that explains variations in employees’ hypocrisy interpretations based on consequentialist and deontological forms of moral judgement. Our research advances a contextual view of hypocrisy, not as an objective characteristic of an organisation, but as an outcome of interpretative processes of perceived motives and results in CSR implementation. Our framework thereby explains why even highly committed organisations may face accusations of hypocrisy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
All names are fictional.
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Gabriel, K. P. (2020). Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: A behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective. Management Research: THe Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1053
Ahmed, M. M., Chung, K. Y., & Eichenseher, J. W. (2003). Business students’ perception of ethics and moral judgment: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1–2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022915316112
Alzola, M. (2015). Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25, 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.24
Antoni, A., Reinecke, J., & Fotaki, M. (2020). Caring or not caring for coworkers? An empirical exploration of the dilemma of care allocation in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30, 447–485.
Babu, N., De Roeck, K., & Raineri, N. (2020). Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 114(July), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.034
Barden, J., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2005). “Saying One Thing and Doing Another”: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276430
Barnett, M. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40(3), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433854
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205
Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization and Environment, 27(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614537078
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489–506.
Carlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018). Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217695089
Chang, E. (2005). Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness. Human Relations, 58(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705055037
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2019a). Talk–action dynamics: Modalities of aspirational talk. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619896267
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2019b). Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 114(July), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.
Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697
Eby, L., Adams, D., Russell, J., & Gaby, S. (2000). Perception of organizational readiness for change. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700533006.
Effron, D. A., Connor, K. O., Leroy, H., & Lucas, B. J. (2018). From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation? Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.003
El Akremi, A., Gond, J.-P., Swaen, V., Roeck, K. D., & Igalens, J. (2018). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 44(2), 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569311
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Ethics.html?id=ZftGAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
Girschik, V. (2020). Shared responsibility for societal problems: The role of internal activists in reframing corporate responsibility. Business and Society, 59(1), 34–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318789867
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.2307/588533
Gond, J.-P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 246(January), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2170
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Piccolo, R. F. (2015). When leaders fail to “walk the talk”: Supervisor undermining and perceptions of leader hypocrisy. Journal of Management, 41(3), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312442386
Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443630
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
Hejjas, K., Miller, G., & Scarles, C. (2019). “It’s Like Hating Puppies!” Employee disengagement and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3791-8
Hengst, I.-A.A., Jarzabkowski, P., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2020). Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0960
Higgins, C., Tang, S., & Stubbs, W. (2020). On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Research, 114(June), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.041
Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011). Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: Reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1562–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00984.x
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.375.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C. E. (2015). Empowering employee sustainability: Perceived organizational support toward the environment. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x
MacLean, T., Litzky, B. E., & Holderness, D. K. (2015). When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2103-1
Maon, F., Vanhamme, J., De Roeck, K., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Roeck, K., et al. (2019). The dark side of stakeholder reactions to corporate social responsibility: Tensions and micro-level undesirable outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12198
Mccarthy, L. (2017). Empowering women through corporate social responsibility: A feminist Foucauldian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27, 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.28
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., Fein, S., Savitsky, K. K., Tuller, D. M., & Monin, B. (2012). The strategic pursuit of moral credentials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 774–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.017
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Monin, B., & Merritt, A. (2011). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (Vol. 1, pp. 167–184). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-009.
Noy, C. (2017). Ethnography of communication. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0089.
Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2013). License to Ill: The effects of corporate social responsibility and CEO moral identity on corporate social irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 861–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12029
Paillé, P., & Raineri, N. (2015). Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees eco-initiatives: The influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2404–2411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.021
Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2008). The aftermath of organizational corruption: Employee attributions and emotional reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 823–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9471-8
Philippe, T. W., & Koehler, J. W. (2005). A Factor analytical study of perceived organizational hypocrisy. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(2), 13.
Pinkse, J., Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2019). Supersized tensions and slim responses? The discursive construction of strategic tensions around social issues. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(3), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0150
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). What is a “fair” price? Ethics as sensemaking. Organization Science, 26(3), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0968
Rotundo, M. (2019). Corporate social irresponsibility in spite of efforts to act responsibly. In A. McWilliams, D. E. Rupp, D. S. Siegel, G. K. Stahl & D. A. Waldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 176–206). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198802280.001.0001.
Roulet, T. J., & Touboul, S. (2015). The intentions with which the road is paved: Attitudes to liberalism as determinants of greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2097-8
Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.380
Rupp, D. E., & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505
Scheidler, S., Marie, L., Schons, E., Spanjol, J., & Wieseke, J. (2019). Scrooge posing as Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3
Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Accounting Forum, 34(3–4), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.05.002
Smith, N. C., Read, D., & López-Rodríguez, S. (2012). Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility: The CSR Halo effect. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1577000
Snelson-Powell, A. C., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. I. (2019). Organizational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk–action inconsistency. Journal of Business Research, 114(August), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.021
Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2018). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0171-7
Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. M. (2016). Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120963
Wagner, T., Korschun, D., & Troebs, C. (2019). Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets. Journal of Business Research, 114, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041
Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544.
Washburn, N. T., Lange, D., Washburn, N. T., & Lange, D. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0522
Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0218
Winkler, P., Etter, M., & Castelló, I. (2019). Vicious and virtuous circles of aspirational talk: From self-persuasive to agonistic CSR rhetoric. Business and Society, 59(1), 000765031982575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319825758
Winkler, P., Etter, M., & Wehmeier, S. (2017). Forms of talk–action-inconsistency: Introducing reverse coupling. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917699523
Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2576-6
Yang, L., Athanasopoulou, A., Manika, D., & Athanasopoulou, A. (2019). Are they sinners or saints? A multi-level investigation of hypocrisy in organisational and employee pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Business Research, 114(August), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.042
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical Approval
We hereby assure that we complied with all ethical standards from the COPE guidelines.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Data Sources
Appendix: Data Sources
Data sources | Specification of collected data | Use in the analysis |
|---|---|---|
Interviews | From January/2018 to December/2019 | Gather perceptions and examples of misalignments and hypocrisy |
Number of interviews: 30 | ||
Subunits: 20 | ||
Roles: | Gather data from different subunits and hierarchical positions in the organisation | |
– Managerial: 5 | ||
– Coordination: 11 | ||
– Operational: 5 | ||
– Sellers: 8 | ||
Total: | ||
23 h of interviews | ||
From 30 to 100 min | ||
Documents | From 2007 to 2017: | Triangulate and verify information from our respondents |
– Sustainability report 2007: 43 pages | Gather data regarding specific sustainability objectives and indicators | |
– Sustainability report 2008: 99 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2009: 147 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2010: 114 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2011: 134 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2012: 189 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2013: 175 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2014: 84 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2015: 122 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2016: 150 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2017: 122 pages | ||
– Sustainability report 2018: 125 pages | ||
– Sustainability Vision (launched in 2015): 44 pages | ||
Minutes from meetings on sustainability: | Understand the language and details in specific projects that came up in the interviews | |
Eight meetings from January to April 2019 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lauriano, L.A., Reinecke, J. & Etter, M. When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation. J Bus Ethics 181, 827–845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04954-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04954-6