Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modern Slavery and the Discursive Construction of a Propertied Freedom: Evidence from Australian Business

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

This paper examines the ethics of the Australian business community’s responses to the phenomenon of modern slavery. Engaging a critical discourse approach, we draw upon a data set of submissions by businesses and business representatives to the Australian government’s Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade ‘Parliamentary Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia’—which preceded the signing into law of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018—to examine the business community’s discursive construction in their submissions of the ethical–political concept of freedom. The paper shows how the concept of freedom was employed by Australian business in a manner that privileged their own subject status and advocated for legislation with minimal burden. Relating this contemporary case to a longer historical context, we show how Australian business responses towards modern slavery map onto liberal and neoliberal ethics in which the freedom of the propertied takes precedent over that of the property-less. Further, we show discursive similarities in the arguments presented by modern Australian businesses and certain historical efforts by members of the business community to privilege commercial freedoms in responses to 18th and 19th Century abolitionist movements. Overall, our research makes two important contributions: first, it highlights the value of a critical discourse lens in business ethics research to show how business and other stakeholders in the field construct and shape their own and other’s ethically-laden understanding of reality; and second, it presents a case for considerable scepticism about the motivation of (Australian) business to employ the freedoms made available to it under neo/liberal discourse to confront a key human rights challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Constable.

  • Bales, K. (1999). Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy. University of California Press.

  • Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘CEO-speak’ after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., Winchester, N., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2020). Enchantment in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04592-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benstead, A., Hendry, L., & Stevenson, M. (2018). Horizontal collaboration in response to modern slavery legislation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), 2286–2312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkey, R. N., Guidry, R. P., Islam, M. A., & Patten, D. M. (2018). Mandated social disclosure: An analysis of the response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 827–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace, L., & O’Connell Davidson, J. (Eds.). (2018). Revisiting slavery and antislavery: Towards a critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as cultural meaning management: A critique of the marketing of ‘ethical’ bottled water. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, R. (2018). The role of discourse analysis in researching severe labour exploitation. In G. LeBaron (Ed.), Researching forced labour in the global economy: Methodological challenges and advances (pp. 167–182). Oxford University Press.

  • Caruana, R., Crane, A., Gold, S., & LeBaron, G. (2021). Modern slavery in business: The sad and sorry state of a non-field. Business and Society, 60(2), 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1213–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, K., & Burritt, R. (2018). Current perceptions on the problem of modern slavery in business. Business Strategy and Development, 1(2), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, K., Rao, K. K., & Burritt, R. (2019). Accounting for modern slavery: An analysis of Australian listed company disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3), 836–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. (2003). The denial of slavery in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1895–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2013). Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N., & Gittens, M. (2010). Business and the public affairs of slavery: A discursive approach of an ethical public issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. (2018). Addressing modern slavery in New Zealand law. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 43(2), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. B. (1975). The problem of slavery in the age of revolution, 1770–1823. Cornell University Press.

  • Davis, D. B. (1984). Slavery and human progress. Oxford University Press.

  • Davis, D. B. (1987). Reflections on abolitionism and ideological hegemony. American Historical Review, 92(4), 797–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. B. (2014). The problem of slavery in the age of emancipation. Vintage Books.

  • Dean, O., & Marshall, S. (2020). A race to the middle of the pack: An analysis of slavery and human trafficking statements submitted by Australian banks under the UK Modern Slavery Act. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 26(1), 46–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G. (2006). Discourse and descriptive business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C., & Eble, M. (2015). Giving voice to the silenced: Using critical discourse analysis to inform crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 717–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

  • Flynn, A. (2020). Determinants of corporate compliance with modern slavery reporting. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freese, B. (2020). Industrial-strength denial: Eight stories of corporations defending the indefensible, from the slave trade to climate change. University of California Press.

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose. Harcourt.

  • Gold, S., Trautrims, A., & Trodd, Z. (2015). Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 20(5), 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P., Redman, T., & McMurray, R. (2019). ‘Lower than a snake’s belly’: Discursive constructions of dignity and heroism in low-status garbage work. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 889–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Palmer, I., & Phillips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53(9), 1227–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1979). What is wrong with slavery. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(2), 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

  • Hayek, L. (1944). The road to serfdom. University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, L. (1960[2006]). The constitution of liberty. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Heikkinen, S., Lämsä, A., & Niemistö, C. (2020). Work-family practices and complexity of their usage: A discourse analysis towards socially responsible human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04458-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, T. (2007). Taboos in corporate social responsibility discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara, S. (2017). Modern slavery: A global perspective. Colombia University Press.

  • Laasonen, S., Fougère, M., & Kourula, A. (2012). Dominant articulations in academic business and society discourse on NGO-Business relations: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 521–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laski, H. (1936). The rise of European liberalism. Routledge.

  • LeBaron, G., & Rühmkorf, A. (2019). The domestic politics of corporate accountability legislation: Struggles over the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act. Socio-Economic Review, 17(3), 709–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1941[2005]). Some social implications of modern technology. In A. Arato, & E. Gebhardt (Eds.), The essential Frankfurt School reader (pp. 138–162). Continuum.

  • Mark-Ungericht, B., & Weiskopf, R. (2007). Filling the empty shell. The public debate on CSR in Austria as a paradigmatic example of a political discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1852). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Available at https://www.marxist.org

  • Masige, S. (2019). The list of the top 100 companies in the world is out – and BHP is the only Australian business while Microsoft dethroned Apple for the first time in 8 years. Business Insider, August 19.

  • Monciardini, D., Bernaz, N., & Andhov, A. (2021). The organizational dynamics of compliance with the UK Modern Slavery Act in the food and tobacco sector. Business & Society, 60(2), 288–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. T. (2019). The new slave narrative: The battle over representations of contemporary slavery. Columbia University Press.

  • New, S. (2015). Modern slavery and the supply chain: The limits of corporate social responsibility. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 20(6), 697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J., & Boersma, M. (2019). Addressing modern slavery. UNSW Press.

  • Nolan, J., & Bott, G. (2018). Global supply chains and human rights: Spotlight on forced labour and modern slavery practices. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 24(1), 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson, J. (2015). Modern slavery: The margins of freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Odia, J. (2019). Modern slavery in global supply chains: The challenges of legislations and mandatory disclosures. In J. L. Garcia-Alcaraz, C. Sanchez-Ramirez, L. Avelar-Sosa, & G. Alor-Hernandez (Eds.), Techniques, tools and methodologies applied to global supply chain ecosystems (pp. 53–72). Springer.

  • Phillips, N., LeBaron, G., & Wallin, S. (2018). Mapping and measuring the effectiveness of labour related disclosure requirements for global supply chains. ILO Research Department Working Paper 32.

  • Pierce, S. C. (2011). Turning a blind eye: U.S. corporate involvement in modern day slavery. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 14(2), 577–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ras, I. A., & Gregoriou, C. (2019). The quest to end modern slavery: Metaphors in corporate modern slavery statements. Anti-Trafficking Review, 13, 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2001). Corporate governance and the ethics of Narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. (2015). Policy and practice: Claiming space for labour rights within the United Kingdom modern slavery crusade. Anti-Trafficking Review, 5, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir, H., Hyman, M., Dean, D., & Dahl, S. (2020). ‘Freedom through marketing’ is not doublespeak. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A., & Nolan, J. (2020). Modern slavery laws in Australia: Steps in the right direction? Business and Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Johns, J. (2020). Historicizing modern slavery: Free-grown sugar as an ethics-driven market category in nineteenth-century Britain. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(2), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, C., & Michailova, S. (2018). Why modern slavery thrives in multinational corporations’ global value chains. Multinational Business Review, 26(3), 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szörényi, A. (2016). Expelling slavery from the nation: Representations of labour exploitation in Australia’s supply chain. Anti-Trafficking Review, 7, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest, P., & Marschke, M. (2020). Modern slavery and freedom: Exploring contradictions through labour scandals in the Thai fisheries. Antipode, 52(1), 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1983). Discourse analysis: Its development and application to the structure of news. Journal of Communication, 33(2), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2019). The National Ecological Accounting and Auditing Scheme as an instrument of institutional reform in China: A discourse analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.

  • Wray-Bliss, E. (2019). Neoliberalism, management and religion: Re-examining the spirits of capitalism. Routledge.

  • Yea, S., & Chok, S. (2018). Unfreedom unbound: Developing a cumulative approach to understanding unfree labour in Singapore. Work, Employment and Society, 32(5), 925–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Macquarie University Business School, Sydney, NSW, 2019, Australia

    Edward Wray-Bliss & Grant Michelson

Authors
  1. Edward Wray-Bliss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grant Michelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Wray-Bliss.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wray-Bliss, E., Michelson, G. Modern Slavery and the Discursive Construction of a Propertied Freedom: Evidence from Australian Business. J Bus Ethics 179, 649–663 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04845-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04845-w

Keywords

search

Navigation