Skip to main content

The Joint Effect of Ethical Idealism and Trait Skepticism on Auditors’ Fraud Detection

Abstract

Although regulators have identified ethical lapses as a key factor contributing to auditors’ failure to detect their clients’ fraudulent financial reporting (fraud), research using ethical theory to examine auditors’ fraud detection remains limited. We provide evidence on the joint effect of ethical idealism and trait skepticism on auditors’ fraud judgments. Ethical idealism reflects an individual’s concern for the welfare of others while trait skepticism reflects an individual’s disposition to validating a proposition. Forsyth (J Pers Soc Psychol 39:175–184, 1980) theorizes that there is an association between ethical idealism and tolerance for deception. Drawing on that insight, we posit that ethical idealism and trait skepticism have a complementary effect on auditors’ fraud planning performance. This is because the former determines an auditor’s tolerance for allowing a client to get away with an ethically questionable act while the latter is important in determining how evidence is generally sought and evaluated. We used the Forsyth (1980) ethical position questionnaire to measure ethical idealism and the Hurtt (Auditing: A J Pract Theory 29(1):149–171, 2010) scale to measure trait skepticism. Our results indicate that there is a significant positive association between trait skepticism and the number of effective audit procedures but only for auditors who have high ethical idealism. The results highlight the importance of measuring and controlling for the effects of these traits when evaluating fraud detection performance. The paper also contributes by showing that an ethics theory can generate additional understanding of and insights into an important accounting phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Achilles, W. W. (2006). An experimental analysis of the impact of goal orientation, ethical orientation and personality traits on managers’ and accountants’ ability to recognize misappropriation of assets. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University.

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Certified Accountants (AICPA). (2016a). Code of professional conduct. Retrieved from http://pub.aicpa.org/codeofconduct/ethicsresources/et-cod.pdf.

  • American Institute of Certified Accountants (AICPA). (2016b). AU-C Section 240: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Retrieved from https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AU-C-00240.pdf.

  • Arirail, D., & Crumbley, L. (2019). PwC and the colonial bank fraud: A perfect storm. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 11(3), 440–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2004). The effectiveness of alternative risk assessments and program planning tools in a fraud setting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asare, S. K., Wright, A. M., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2015). Challenges facing auditors in detecting financial statement fraud: Insights from fraud investigations. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 7(2), 63–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2016). 2016 Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Austin, TX: ACFE. Retrieved from https://www.acfe.com/rttn2016/docs/2016-report-to-the-nations.pdf.

  • Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G., & Hebert, F. J. (1998). Ethical ideology and the ethical judgments of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 715–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review, 80(11), 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., & Hermanson, D. R. (1999). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1987–1997, An analysis of US public companies. New York, NY: COSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1998–2007, An analysis of US public companies. New York, NY: COSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boritz, J. E., Kotchetova-Kozloski, N., & Robinson, L. A. (2015). Are fraud specialists relatively effective than auditors at modifying audit programs in the presence of fraud risk? Accounting Review, 90(3), 881–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. D., Durtschi, C., & Gaynor, L. M. (2011). The incremental benefits of a forensic accounting course on skepticism and fraud-related judgments. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2013). Professional skepticism: The effects of a partner’s influence and the presence of fraud on auditors’ fraud judgments and actions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, B. E. (2000). Economic analysis of skepticism in an audit setting. In 14th Symposium on Auditing Research, edited by I. Solomon and M.E. Peecher, 11–13.

  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P., & Wier, B. (2000). Integrating ethical dimensions into a model of budgetary slack creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?. Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (2002). Twenty-First century assurance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eutsler, J., Norris, A. E., & Trompeter, G. (2018). A live simulation-based investigation: Interactions with clients and their effect on audit judgment and professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 49(2–3), 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2019). Latest FRC audit inspections. Retrieved July 10, 2019, from https://www.frc.org.uk/news/july-2019/latest-frc-audit-inspections.

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2011). Rules, standards, and ethics: Relativism predicts cross-national differences in the codification of moral standards. International Business Review, 20, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2013). Ethics position theory and unethical work behavior. In R. A. Giacalone & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being (pp. 221–236). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 813–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, C., & Murphy, P. (2015). The ties that bind: The decision to co-offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 18–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, R., and Durtschi, C. (2004). The effect of professional skepticism on the fraud detection skills of internal auditors. Journal of Utah State University. 14–23.

  • Glover, S., & Prawitt, D. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, S., Prawitt, D., Schultz, J., Jr., & Zimbelman, M. (2003). A test of changes in auditors’ fraud-related planning judgments since the issuance of SAS No. 82. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 37–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A. C., Strand Norman, C., & Wier, B. (2008). The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earnings management behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. (2018). Deepening ethical analysis in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., & Paillé, A. M. (2014). Fear and risk in the audit process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39, 264–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., & Tremblay, M. S. (2015). On the operational reality of auditors’ independence: Lessons from the field. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(2), 201–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, J. S. (2011). A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, J. S., Bamber, E. M., & Carpenter, T. D. (2010). The influence of documentation specificity and priming on auditors’ fraud risk assessments and evidence evaluation decisions. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 547–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R., & Jurkiwicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in the workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, V. B., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2009). Do strategic reasoning and brainstorming help auditors change their standard audit procedures in response to fraud risk? The Accounting Review, 84(3), 811–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, V. B., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). How strategic reasoning and brainstorming can help auditors detect fraud? Current Issues in Auditing, 6(2), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. A. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 8(2), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H. L., Early, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism—Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 45–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt, R. K., Eining, M. M., and Plumlee, D. (2012). Linking professional skepticism to auditors’ behaviors. Working paper, Baylor University, and University of Utah.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2010a). International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 200: Overall Objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a008-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-200.pdf.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2010b). International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 240: The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/downloads/a012-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA). (2016). 2016 handbook of the code of ethics for professional accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ethicsboard.org/iesba-code.

  • Johari, R. J., Mohd-Sanusi, Z., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effects of auditors’ ethical orientation and self-interest independence threat on the mediating role of moral intensity and ethical decision-making process. International Journal of Auditing, 21(1), 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., Fleischman, G., Valentine, S., & Walker, K. (2012). Managers’ ethical evaluations of earnings management and its consequences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 910–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroney, J. J., & McDevitt, R. E. (2008). The effects of moral reasoning on financial reporting decisions in a post sarbanes- oxley environment. Behavioral Research of Accounting, 20(2), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing. Monograph No. 6 American Accounting Organization. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nallareddy, S., & Ogneva, M. (2017). Predicting restatements in macroeconomic indicators using accounting information. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. W., and Tan, H. T. (2005). Judgment and decision making research in auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24, 41–71.

  • Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, S. C., Wier, B., & Achilles, W. W. (2008). Can ethical position contribute to our understanding of fraud detection? Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 4(1), 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peytcheva, M. (2014). Professional skepticism and auditor cognitive performance in a hypothesis-testing task. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(1), 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popova, V. (2013). Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 140–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007a). Observations on Auditors’ Implementation of PCAOB Standards Relating to Auditors’ Responsibilities with Respect to Fraud. Release No. 2007–001. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/2007_01-22_Release_2007-001.pdf.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007b). Standing advisory group meeting: Panel discussion—forensic audit procedures February 22. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/02222007_SAGMeeting/Forensic_Audit_Procedures.pdf.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2008). Report on the PCAOB’s 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 inspections of domestic annually inspected firms. Release No. 2008-008. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/2008_12-05_Release_2008-008.pdf.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2010). Auditing standard No. 12: Identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement. Release No. 210-004. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/Auditing_Standard_12.aspx.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Staff Audit Practice Alert No. 9—Assessing and responding to risk in the current economic environment. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Standards/QandA/12-06-2011_SAPA_9.pdf.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2012). Staff audit practice alert No. 10: Maintaining and applying professional skepticism in audits. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Standards/QandA/12-04-2012_SAPA_10.pdf.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2015). AS 2401: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Retrieved from http://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/Auditing_Standard_12.aspx.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2020). Due professional care in the performance of work. AS 1015. Retrieved from https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AS1015_amendments.aspx.

  • Quadackers, L. M. (2009). A study of auditors’ skeptical characteristics and their relationship to skeptical judgments and decisions. Doctoral dissertation, VU University Amsterdam.

  • Quadackers, L. M., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditor’s professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. N., Curtis, M. B., & Roberston, J. C. (2018). Disentangling the trait and state components of professional skepticism: Specifying a process for state scale development. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 215–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B., & Forsyth, D. R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (1997). In the matter of Bausch & Lomb incorporated, Harold O. Johnson, Ermin Lanacone, and Kurt Matsumoto, respondents. Accounting and auditing enforcement release No. 987. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/3439329.txt.

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2019). KPMG paying $50 million penalty for illicit use of PCAOB data and cheating on training exams. release No. 2019-95. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-95.

  • Shaub, M. K., Finn, D., & Boshuizen, H. (1993). The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on commitment and ethical sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, C., & Lancaster, K. (2001). An experimental assessment of business students’ abilities to recognize fraud risk factors associated with misappropriation of assets. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 4, 333–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2003). Consumer ethics: Determinants of ethical beliefs of African Americans. Journal of Business, 46(2), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwey, I. (2014). Differences between public auditors and forensic accountants in their ability to identify fraud risks and plan effective procedures to mitigate fraud risks: The relationship between individual traits and fraud experience and training on fraud risk identification and planning audit procedures. Doctoral dissertation, Nyenrode Business University.

  • Verwey, I., & Asare, S. K. (2018). The effect of forensic expertise on fraud planning. Working paper, Nyenrode Business University, and University of Florida.

  • Zimbelman, M. F. (1997). The effects of SAS No. 82 on auditors’ attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inez G. F. Verwey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The authors declare that the study has been performed in accordance with the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice 2004 (Version 2014). Available at: https://www.vsnu.nl/files/documenten/Domeinen/Onderzoek/The_Netherlands_Code%20of_Conduct_for_Academic_Practice_2004_(version2014).pdf.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. No identifying information about the participants in the study is included in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verwey, I.G.F., Asare, S.K. The Joint Effect of Ethical Idealism and Trait Skepticism on Auditors’ Fraud Detection. J Bus Ethics 176, 381–395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04718-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04718-8

Keywords

  • Audit planning
  • Fraud detection
  • Trait skepticism
  • Ethical position

JEL Classification

  • M42
  • C91
  • D91