We introduce the papers in this special issue by providing an overarching perspective on the variety in kinds of commons and the ethical issues stemming from their diversity. Despite a long history of local commons management, recent decades have witnessed a surge of scholarly interest in the concept of “the commons,” including a growing management literature. This swell was impelled especially by Garrett Hardin’s paper of 1968, and the body of work generated by Elinor Ostrom and her colleagues. However, the term itself has come to be used in a variety of ways. To contextualize its ethical dimensions, we map a number of commons-related concepts such as common-pool resources, common property regime, excludability and subtractability, common-pool resource types and commons or “commoning” as a source of production. Following a brief summary of papers in this special issue, the essay concludes with an identification of implications for research, practice and policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The term “common” sometimes appears in the literature with the definite article (the), sometimes with the indefinite article (a), and sometimes with neither. De Moor (2011, p. 423) identifies the use with either article as the “historical “ use, referring to “a set of well-defined and circumscribed resources (usually land), with rules and sanctions attached to them.” She contrasts this with the “more recent use” without either article, and referring to “anything not privately held.” While this may be a rough guide to the way the term is used in the literature, we have found many exceptions to it, including the use in Hardin’s influential article, and have not attempted to preserve a rigorous distinction between the two uses in our text.
Agrawal, A. (1999). Greener pastures: Politics, markets and community amongst migrant pastoral people. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672.
Agrawal, A. (2002). Common resources and institutional sustainability. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 41–85). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Akrivou, K., & Sison, A. J. G. (2016). The challenges of capitalism for virtue ethics and the common good: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Albareda, L., & Waddock, S. (2018). Networked CSR governance: A whole network approach to meta-governance. Business & Society, 57(4), 636–675.
Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040.
Arvanitakis, J. (2006). The commons: Opening and enclosing non-commodified space. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 3(1), 1–21.
Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (2004). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1150–1170.
Benkler, Y. (1998). Overcoming agoraphobia: Building the commons of the digitally networked environment. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 11(2), 287–400.
Benkler, Y. (2004). Commons-based strategies and the problems of patents. Science, 305(5687), 1110–1111.
Berkes, F. (Ed.). (1989). Common property resources: Ecology and community-based sustainable development. London, UK: Belhaven Press.
Bird, E. J., & Wagner, G. G. (1997). Sport as a common property resource: A solution to the dilemmas of doping. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6), 749–766.
Bjørklund, I. (1990). Sámi reindeer pastoralism as an indigenous resource management system in Northern Norway: A contribution to the common property debate. Development and Change, 21, 75–86.
Blackmar, E. (2006). Appropriating “the commons”: The tragedy of property rights discourse. In S. Low & N. Smith (Eds.), The politics of public space (pp. 49–80). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Boal, I. A. (1998). The campus and the commons. Common Property Resource Digest, 46, 1–4.
Bollier, D. (2001). Public assets, private profits: Reclaiming the American commons in an age of market enclosure. Washington, DC: New American Foundation.
Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2014). The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.
Bowden, N., & de Jong, M. (2006). Privatisation of seaport infrastructures: A framework for understanding the transfer of property rights. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2(2/3), 294–317.
Bowen, F. E., Bansal, P., & Slawinski, N. (2018). Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1411–1436.
Boyle, J. (2008). The public domain: Enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Brin, D. (1995). The internet as a commons. Information Technology and Libraries, 14(4), 240–242.
Bromley, D. W., & Cochrane, J. A. (1994). Understanding the global commons. EPAT/MUCIA Research & Training, University of Wisconsin, (Working Paper, no. 13), 1–23.
Bryden, J., & Geisler, C. (2007). Community-based land reform: Lessons from Scotland. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 24–34.
Buck, S. J. (1998). The global commons: An introduction. Washington, DC: Island press.
Caffentzis, G. (2010). The future of 'the commons’: Neoliberalism’s ‘plan b’ or the original disaccumulation of capital? New Formations, 69, 23–41.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V., & Bishop, R. C. (1975). Common property as a concept in natural resource policy. Natural Resources Journal, 15, 713–727.
De Filippi, P., & Tréguer, F. (2015). Expanding the Internet commons: The subversive potential of wireless community networks. Journal of Peer Production 6.
Dell’Angelo, J., D’Odorico, P., Rulli, M. C., & Marchand, P. (2017). The tragedy of the grabbed commons: Coercion and dispossession in the global land rush. World Development, 92, 1–12.
De Moor, T. (2011). From common pastures to global commons: A historical perspective on interdisciplinary approaches to commons. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19(4), 422–431.
Des Jardins, J. R. (2012). Environmental ethics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Dey, P. (2016). Destituent entrepreneurship: Disobeying sovereign rule, prefiguring post-capitalist reality. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(7–8), 563–579.
Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2002). The drama of the commons. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 3–35). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.
Epstein, R. A. (2002). The allocation of the commons: Parking on public roads. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(2), S515–S544.
Fauchart, E., & Cowan, R. (2014). Weak links and the management of of reputational interdependencies. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 532–549.
Forsyth, D. R. (2006). Conflict. In D. R. Forsyth (Ed.), Group dynamics (5th ed., pp. 388–389). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Fournier, V. (2013). Commoning: On the social organisation of the commons. Management, 16(4), 433–453.
Frémeaux, S. (2020). A Common good perspective on diversity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 200–228.
Frischmann, B. M. (2005). Infrastructure commons. Michigan State Law Review, 89(4), 121–136.
Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2016). Commoning as a postcapitalist politics. In A. Amin & P. Howell (Eds.), Releasing the commons: Rethinking the futures of the commons (pp. 192–212). New York: Routledge.
Gordon, H. S. (1954). The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery. The Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 124–142.
Groves, T., & Ledyard, J. (1977). Optimal allocation of public goods: A solution to the “free rider” problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 45, 783–809.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Hart, J. (2003). Sustaining a sacramental commons. Dialog, 42(3), 235–241.
Hartman, E. M. (1994). The commons and the moral organization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(3), 253–269.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haugh, H. (2007). Community-led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 161–182.
Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons. Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688.
Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280(5364), 698–701.
Hess, C. (2000). Is there anything new under the sun? A discussion and survey of studies on new commons and the Internet. Proceedings from Constituting the Commons–the eighth biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomingdon, Indiana, May 31–June 4.
Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. Proceedings from Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, England, July 14–18.
Hess, C. (2012). The unfolding of the knowledge commons. St Antony’s International Review, 8(1), 13–24.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: Information as a common-pool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111–145.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hiatt, H. H. (1975). Protecting the medical commons: Who is responsible? New England Journal of Medicine, 293, 235–241.
Huberman, B. A., & Lukose, R. M. (1997). Social dilemmas and internet congestion. Science, 277(5325), 535–537.
Hyde, L. H. (1998). Created Commons. The Andy Warhol Foundation for the visual arts. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://www.warholfoundation.org/paperseries/article8.htm.
Illich, I. (1983). Silence is a commons. The Coevolution Quarterly, 40, 5–9.
Jones, C., & Murtola, A.-M. (2012). Entrepreneurship and expropriation. Organization, 19(5), 635–655.
Jonsen, K., Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M. F., & Bell, M. P. (2013). The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity. Human Relations, 66(2), 271–294.
Joranson, K. (2008). Indigenous knowledge and the knowledge commons. The International Information & Library Review, 40(1), 64–72.
Kenrick, J. (2011). Scottish land reform and indigenous peoples' rights: Self-determination and historical reversibility. Social Anthropology, 19(2), 189–203.
King, A. A., Lenox, M., & Barnett, M. L. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. Hoffman & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 393–406). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kleit, R. G. (2004). Designing and managing public housing self-sufficiency programs: The youngs lake commons program. Evaluation Review, 28(5), 363–395.
Kranich, N. (2006). Countering enclosure: Reclaiming the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 85–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Libecap, G. (1990). Contracting for property rights. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lucchi, N. (2013). Understanding genetic information as a commons: From bioprospecting to personalized medicine. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 313–338.
Mackenzie, F. (2010). A common claim: Community land ownership in the Outer Hebrides. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 319–344.
Marx, K., & Engels, K. (1967). Capital. A critique of political economy. New York, NY: International Publishers.
McKean, M. A. (2000). Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work. In C. Gibson, M. McKean, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance (pp. 27–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.
Meretz, S. (2012). The structural communality of the commons. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the commons (pp. 28–44). Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.
Meyer, C. (2020). The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), 106034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106034.
Meyer, C., & Hudon, M. (2017). Alternative organizations in finance: Commoning in complementary currencies. Organization, 24(5), 629–647.
Meyer, C., & Hudon, M. (2019). Money and the commons: An investigation of complementary currencies and their ethical implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 277–292.
Monbiot, G. (1994). The tragedy of enclosure. Scientific American, 270(1), 159–160.
Nemeth, S. C., Mitchell, M. N., & Nyman, E. A. (2014). Ruling the commons: Institutionalizing and privatizing the commons. International Interactions, 40(5), 711–736.
O’Brien, T. (2009). Reconsidering the common good in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25–37.
O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32, 1179–1198.
O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ossewaarde, M., & Reijers, W. (2017). The illusion of the digital commons:‘False consciousness’ in online alternative economies. Organization, 24(5), 609–628.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Private and common property rights. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics: Civil law and economics (Vol. 2). Ghent, Belgium: University of Ghent.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Defining “the Commons”. Retrieved 10 February 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXzbcgj9F54
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Paul, C. (2008). Digital art/public art: governance and agency in the networked commons. In C. Sommerer, L. C. Jain, & L. Mignonneau (Eds.), The art and science of interface and interaction design (pp. 163–185). New York: Springer.
Peredo, A. M. (2003). Emerging strategies against poverty: The road less traveled. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(2), 155–166.
Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.
Peredo, A. M., Haugh, H. M., & McLean, M. (2018). Common property: Uncommon forms of prosocial organizing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 591–602.
Périlleux, A., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Understanding cooperative finance as a new common. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(2), 155–177.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Robertson, M. (2016). Common property redux. UBCL Rev, 49, 563–617.
Rose, C. (2002). Common property, regulatory property and environmental protection: comparing community-based management to tradable environmental allowances. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 233–261). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rueck, D. (2014). Commons, enclosure, and resistance in Kahnawá: Ke mohawk territory, 1850–1900. Canadian Historical Review, 95(3), 352–381.
Runge, C. F., & Defrancesco, E. (2006). Exclusion, inclusion, and enclosure: Historical commons and modern intellectual property. World Development, 34(10), 1713–1727.
Scharper, S. B., & Cunningham, H. (2006). The genetic commons: Resisting the neo-liberal enclosure of life. Social Analysis, 50(3), 195–202.
Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68, 249–262.
Scott, A. (1955). The fishery: The objectives of sole ownership. Journal of Political Economy, 63(2), 116–124.
Sened, I., & Riker, W. H. (1996). Common property and private property: The case of air slots. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8(4), 427–447.
Sevilla-Buitrago, A. (2015). Capitalist formations of enclosure: Space and the extinction of the commons. Antipode, 47(4), 999–1020.
Shiva, V., & Holla-Bhar, R. (1993). Intellectual piracy & the neem patents: The neem campaign. Dehradun, India: Research Foundation for Science, Technology & Natural Resource Policy.
Short, C. (2008). The traditional commons of England and Wales in the twenty-first century: Meeting new and old challenges. International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 192–221.
Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.
Sison, A. J. G., Hartman, E. M., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). Guest editors’ introduction: Reviving tradition: Virtue and the common good in business and management. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 207–210.
Snyder, J. (2010). Exploitation and sweatshop labor: Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 187–213.
Solomon, R. C. (1994). The corporation as community: A reply to Ed Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(3), 271–285.
Standing, G. (2019). Plunder of the commons: A manifesto for sharing public wealth. London: Pelican.
Steed, B. C., & Fischer, B. C. (2007). Street trees—are they a misunderstood common-pool resource? Proceedings from Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Fall Colloquium, Bloomington, Indiana.
Sterckx, S., & Cockbain, J. (2016). The ethics of patenting in genetics: A second enclosure of the commons. In B. Prainsack, S. Schicktanz, & G. Werner-Felmayer (Eds.), Genetics as social practice: Transdisciplinary views on science and culture (pp. 145–160). London and New York: Routledge.
Tedmanson, D., Essers, C., Dey, P., & Verduyn, K. (2015). An uncommon wealth. Transforming the commons with purpose, for people and not for profit! Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 439–444.
Triggle, D. J. (2004). Patenting the sun: Enclosing the scientific commons and transforming the university—ethical concerns. Drug Development Research, 63(3), 139–149.
Van Laerhoven, F., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Traditions and trends in the study of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 1, 3–28.
Van Laerhoven, F., Schoon, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2020). Celebrating the 30th anniversary of ostrom’s Governing the commons: Traditions and trends in the study of the commons, revisited. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 208–224.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125–141.
Wade, R. (1989). Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.
Williamson, T. (1987). Common land. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics. London: MacMillan.
World Bank. (2014). The practice of responsible investment principles in large-scale agricultural investments. Implications for corporate performance and impact on local communities. World Bank Report Number 86175-GLB. Washington: World Bank.
Yue, L. Q., & Ingram, P. (2012). Industry self-regulation as a solution to the reputation commons problem: The case of the New York clearing house association. In M. L. Barnett & T. G. Pollock (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (pp. 278–296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 689–727.
The study was supported by Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 603-2007-0008) and Leverhulme Trust (Grant No. 218-443). We thank Murdith McLean for the revision of previous drafts as well as Arno Kourula and the anonymous reviewer for the comments they provided of this editorial essay. Part of the special Issue was developed while Camille Meyer was a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Centre for Social and Sustainable Innovation (CSSI) at the Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria, Canada. CSSI receives funding from Newmont Goldcorp Inc.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Peredo, A.M., Haugh, H.M., Hudon, M. et al. Mapping Concepts and Issues in the Ethics of the Commons: Introduction to the Special Issue. J Bus Ethics 166, 659–672 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04584-4
- Common property regime
- Common-pool resources
- Collective organizing