In the aftermath of shocking workplace scandals, people are often baffled when individuals within the organization were aware of clear-cut wrongdoing yet did not inform authorities. The current research suggests that moral concern for the suffering that a transgressor might face if a crime were reported is an under-recognized, powerful force that shapes whistleblowing in organizations, particularly when transgressors are fellow members of a highly entitative group (i.e., a group that is perceived as highly unified). Two experiments show that group entitativity heightens concern about possible consequences that the transgressor would face if a crime were to be reported, and that this concern reduces the likelihood of reporting wrongdoing in organizations to authorities. Further, the studies identify a mechanism through which concern about the transgressor is heightened in highly entitative groups: potential reporters perceive that the transgressor felt remorse for their crime. Thus, when fellow members of highly entitative organizations commit crimes, people are more likely to imagine that these transgressors felt anxiety or guilt about their actions, and this prompts greater concern for transgressors in ways that encourage people to let them “off the hook.” We discuss the implications of these findings for how reporting to authorities can be encouraged within highly entitative organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, G. S., & Inesi, M. E. (2016). Impediments to forgiveness: Victim and transgressor attributions of intent and guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,111(6), 866–881.
Adelman, L., Yogeeswaran, K., & Lickel, B. (2019). They're all the same, sometimes: Prejudicial attitudes toward Muslims influence motivated judgments of entitativity and collective responsibility for an individual's actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.,80, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.10.002.
Alvesson, M. (2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies,37(8), 1101–1120.
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 93–117). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review,14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189.
Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. (2002). Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start-ups: Lessons from the Stanford Project on Emerging Companies. California Management Review,44(3), 8–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166130.
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality,57, 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x.
Bjørkelo, B., Einarsen, S., & Matthiesen, S. B. (2010). Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,83(2), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X486385.
Blanchard, A. L., Caudill, L. E., & Walker, L. S. (2020). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,23(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217743577.
Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1084–1093.
Bowen, M. (1985). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
Brewer, M. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin,86, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.
Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Handbook of motivation and cognition The interpersonal context 3 (pp. 347–370). New York: The Guilford Press.
Callahan, E., & Dworkin, T. (1994). Who blows the whistle to the media and why: Organizational characteristics of media whistleblowers. American Business Law Journal,32, 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.1994.tb00933.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of person as social entities. Behavioural Science,3, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103.
Carreyrou, J. (2018). Bad blood: Secrets and lies in a Silicon Valley startup. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Cassematis, P. G., & Wortley, R. (2013). Prediction of whistleblowing or non-reporting observation: The role of personal and situational factors. Journal of Business Ethics,117(3), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1548-3.
Castano, E., Paladino, M., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology,41(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602760344269.
Chen, C. X., Nichol, J. E., & Zhou, F. H. (2017). The effect of incentive framing and descriptive norms on internal whistleblowing. Contemporary Accounting Research,34, 1757–1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12325.
Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics,43(1–2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022911215204.
Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,107(5), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245.
Crawford, M. T., & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48(3), 726–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.015.
Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology,40, 1212–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.716.
Daniels, M. A., & Robinson, S. L. (2019). The shame of it all: A review of shame in organizational life. Journal of Management,45(6), 2448–2473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318817604.
Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,9(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059857.
Dungan, J., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2015). The psychology of whistleblowing. Current Opinion in Psychology,6, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.005.
Dungan, J., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2019). The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103848.
Dunn, T., Thompson, V., & Jarvis, R. (2019, March 13). Elizabeth Holmes on Theranos devices not working: “I know that we made mistakes”: “The Dropout” episode 3. ABC News. Retrieved June 21, 2019, from https://abcnews.go.com/Business/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-devices-working-made-mistakes-dropout/story?id=60863557.
Dworkin, T., & Baucus, M. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowing processes. Journal of Business Ethics,17, 1281–1298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916210589.
Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance,65, 2213–2253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.
Ethics Resource Center. (2014). National Business Ethics Survey.
Ford, M. T., Agosta, J. P., Huang, J., & Shannon, C. (2018). Moral emotions toward others at work and implications for employee behavior: A qualitative analysis using critical incidents. Journal of Business and Psychology,33(1), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9484-3.
Fredin, A. (2011). The effects of anticipated regret on the whistleblowing decision. Ethics & Behavior,21(5), 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.604296.
Fu, G., Evans, A. D., Wang, L., & Lee, K. (2008). Lying in the name of the collective good: A developmental study. Developmental Science,11, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00695.x.
Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., & Brown, R. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient's insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Psychology,44(3), 519–526.
Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45(4), 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.013.
Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2010). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,22(4), 291–300.
Green, P., Finkel, E. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Gino, F. (2017). The energizing nature of work engagement: Toward a new need-based theory of work motivation. Research on Organizational Behavior,37, 1–18.
Greenbaum, R., Bonner, J., Gray, T., & Mawritz, M. (2019). Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2367.
Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. The Academy of Management Review,28(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040692.
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davison, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47–74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Henik, E. (2007). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics,80(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9441-1.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology,20, 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200404.
Hornsey, M. J., Wohl, M. J. A., Harris, E. A., Okimoto, T. G., Thai, M., & Wenzel, M. (2019). Embodied remorse: Physical displays of remorse increase positive responses to public apologies, but have negligible effects on forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000208.
Horwitz, S. R., Shutts, K., & Olson, K. R. (2014). Social class differences produce social group preferences. Developmental Science,17, 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12181.
Horwitz, F. M., Heng, C. T., & Quazi, H. A. (2003). Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating and retaining knowledge workers. Human Resource Management Journal,13, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.tb00103.x.
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social– functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,100(4), 719–737.
Johnson, A. L., Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., Ferreira, M. B., et al. (2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42(6), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.002.
Khan, S. R., & Lambert, A. J. (1998). Ingroup favoritism and black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,20, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2004_3.
Kirkhaug, R. (2010). Charisma or group belonging as antecedents of employee work effort? Journal of Business Ethics,96, 647–656.
Kleiber, C., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Applied econometrics with R. New York: Springer Verlag. R.
Knoll, M., & Dick, R. V. (2012). Do i hear the whistle…? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. Journal of Business Ethics,113(2), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1308-4.
Kouchaki, M., Gino, F., & Feldman, Y. (2019). The ethical perils of personal, communal relations: A language perspective. Psychological Science,30(12), 1745–1766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619882917.
Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., de Sousa, L., & Jabbour, A. B. (2019). ‘Whistleblowing triangle’: Framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics,160(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3862-x.
Leary, M. R. (2002). When selves collide: The nature of the self and the dynamics of interpersonal relationships. In A. Tesser, D. A. Stapel, & J. V. Wood (Eds.), Self and motivation (pp. 119–145). Washington, DC: APA.
Leary, M. R., & Miller, R. S. (2000). Self-presentational perspectives on personal relationships. In W. Ickes & S. Duck (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 129–154). New York: Wiley.
Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality,66(1), 1–37.
Leonard, D. J. (2019). They’re a sorry bunch: Perceptions of outgroup entitativity shape the receipt of intergroup apology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,22(4), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217750267.
Lewis, A., & Sherman, S. (2010). Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: When will we denigrate negative ingroup members? The Journal of Social Psychology,150(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366388.
Leyens, J. P., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., et al. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology,31, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.50.
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review,5(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_4.
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206.
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review,10(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,8(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051064.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the columbine high school shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239045.
Lindebaum, D., & Geddes, D. (2016). The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior,37(5), 738–757.
MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). The silent Samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics,120(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1639-9.
Markel, D., Collins, J. M., & Leib, E. J. (2009). A survey of family ties benefits. Privilege or Punish. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380064.003.0001.
Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 287–292.
Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. (1988). The 'Black Sheep Effect': Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology,18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102.
Meneses, R., Ortega, R., Navarro, J., & de Quijano, S. D. (2008). Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups: Groupness, entitativity, and groupality as theoretical perspectives. Small Group Research,39(4), 492–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408319787.
McConnell, A. R., Buchanan, T. M., Lloyd, E. P., & Skulborstad, H. M. (2019). Families as ingroups that provide social resources: Implications for well-being. Self and Identity,18(3), 306–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1451364.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior,67(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.004.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington.
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2009). A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics,86(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9853-6.
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., Rehg, M. T., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2012). Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing. Human Relations,65(8), 923–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712447004.
Misch, A., Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2018). The whistleblowers dilemma in young children: When loyalty trumps other moral concerns. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00250.
Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology,100(4), 1040–1055.
Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior,22, 1–50.
Mulder, R., Bos, A. E. R., Pouwelse, M., & van Dam, K. (2017). Workplace mobbing: How the victim's coping behavior influences bystander responses. The Journal of Social Psychology,157(1), 16–29.
Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics,101(4), 601–618.
Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(2), 163–181.
Navarro, D. J. (2015). Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners (Version 0.5). Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics,4(1), 1–16.
Newheiser, A.-K., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and the moderating effect of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45(4), 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.024.
Newheiser, A., Sawaoka, T., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Why do we punish groups? High entitativity promotes moral suspicion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48(4), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.013.
Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,36, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1399.
Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Evidence from affective priming tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology,29, 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:83.0.CO;2-Q.
Pereira, A., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2018). Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment. PLoS ONE,13(5), e0196852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196852.
Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In G. R. Ferris & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 331–369). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology,50(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X491567.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software,48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011). Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality. Emotion,11(2), 233–240.
Siegel, J. Z., Crockett, M. J., Mathys, C., Rutledge, R. B., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nature Human Behaviour,10, 750. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0425-1.
Smaili, N., & Arroyo, P. (2017). Categorization of whistleblowers using the whistleblowing triangle. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3663-7.
Smith, R., & Brown, A. J. (2008). The good, the bad and the ugly: Whistleblowing outcomes. In A. J. Brown (Ed.), Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector: Enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organisations (pp. 109–135). Canberra: ANU e-press.
Smith-Crowe, K., & Warren, D. E. (2014). The emotion-evoked collective corruption model: The role of emotion in the spread of corruption within organization. Organization Science,25(4), 1154–1171.
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.119.
Stanley, D. J., & Spence, J. R. (2018). Reproducible tables in psychology using the apatables package. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 415–431.
Szczurek, L., Monin, B., & Gross, J. J. (2012). The stranger effect. Psychological Science,23(10), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612445314.
Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). mediation : R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05.
Torchiano, M. (2017). effsize: Efficient Effect Size Computation. R package version 0.7.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=effsize.
Tsang, J. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology,6(1), 25–50.
Vadera, A. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Caza, B. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing's antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly,19(4), 553–586. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200919432.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies,40(6), 1359–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384.
Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86, 585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1685.
Vess, M., Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., & Arndt, J. (2014). Guilty, but not ashamed: “True” self-conceptions influence affective responses to personal shortcomings. Journal of Personality,82(3), 213–224.
Waytz, A., Dungan, J., & Young, L. (2013). The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(6), 1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.002.
Wilke, S. D., Wilke, J. R. D., & Viglione, D. J. (2015). The corporate family model of leadership development. The Psychologist-Manager Journal,18(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000028.
Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J. P., & Paladino, M. P. (2000). The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification. European Review of Social Psychology,11(1), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000059.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, S.R., Howe, L.C. Concern for the Transgressor’s Consequences: An Explanation for Why Wrongdoing Remains Unreported. J Bus Ethics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04568-4
- Moral judgment