An increasing amount of research has examined the management of competing logics, and possible tensions arising between them, within “hybrid organizations.” However, the ways in which the relationships of hybrids with other organizations shape the conciliation of these logics and tensions have received limited attention so far. In this theoretical paper, we examine how hybrid organizations deal with interorganizational collaboration, in particular whether and how their hybridity can be maintained when they partner with “dominant-logic organizations.” Drawing on empirical literature on social enterprise–corporate collaborations, we develop a framework and several propositions on how competing logics and their balancing within hybrid organizations may be affected by interactions with organizations underpinned by one dominant logic. We suggest that influences will mostly depend on the type of collaboration pursued. A collaboration based on a lower level of engagement and interaction between the two partners is likely to give precedence to one logic over the other, reducing inter-logic tensions but possibly compromising organizational hybridity. By contrast, a collaboration featuring numerous interactions and mission compatibility may facilitate sustained hybridity if tensions are acknowledged and managed. Our propositions contribute to the literatures on hybrid organizations, interorganizational collaboration, and social enterprise.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Almandoz, J. (2014). Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly,59(3), 442–473.
André, K., & Pache, A.-C. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics,133(4), 659–675.
Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly,16(2), 211–234.
Ashforth, B. E., & Reingen, P. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly,59(3), 474–516.
Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,29(1), 69–97.
Austin, J., Leonard, H. B., Reficco, E., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: it is for corporations, too. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship. New models of sustainable social change (pp. 169–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,41(5), 726–758.
Barinaga, E. (2018). Coopted! mission drift in a social venture engaged in a cross-sectoral partnership. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.,31, 437.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal,53(6), 1419–1440.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals,8(1), 397–441.
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal,58(6), 1658–1685.
Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review,47(1), 58–90.
Bergman, B. (2017). Agents of change? An inter-organizational research agenda on hybrid new ventures. In A. C. Corbett & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Hybrid ventures (pp. 219–232). New York: Emerald.
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review,39(3), 364–381.
Bezençon, V., & Blili, S. (2009). Fair trade managerial practices: Strategy, organisation and engagement. Journal of Business Ethics,90(1), 95–113.
Blundel, R. K., & Lyon, F. (2014). Towards a ‘long view’: Historical perspectives on the scaling and replication of social ventures. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship,6(1), 80–102.
Bode, I., Gardin, L., & Nyssens, M. (2011). Quasi-marketization in domiciliary care: Varied patterns, similar problems? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,31(3), 225–235.
Borys, B., & Jemison, D. B. (1989). Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review,14(2), 234–249.
Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration,28(9–10), 749–765.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review,66, 44–55.
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of co-operation. Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, A., & Crane, A. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics,150(1), 303–313.
Cornforth, C. (2014). Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal,1, 3.
Crucke, S., & Knockaert, M. (2016). When stakeholder representation leads to faultlines. A study of board service performance in social enterprises. Journal of Management Studies,53(5), 768–793.
Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership,14(4), 411–424.
Davies, I. A., & Doherty, B. (2019). Balancing a hybrid business model: The search for equilibrium at cafédirect. Journal of Business Ethics,157(4), 1043–1066.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in europe: Recent trends and developments. EMES Working Paper 08(01).
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., & Pascucci, S. (2016). Cross-sector partnerships and the co-creation of dynamic capabilities for stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics,135(1), 35–53.
Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., & Haugh, H. (2009). The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate-social enterprise collaboration. Organization Studies,30(8), 887–907.
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations. A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,16(4), 417–436.
Dufays, F., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Where do hybrids come from? Entrepreneurial team heterogeneity as an avenue for the emergence of hybrid organizations. International Small Business Journal,34(6), 777–796.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior,34, 81–100.
Everett, J., & Jamal, T. B. (2004). Multistakeholder collaboration as symbolic marketplace and pedagogic practice. Journal of Management Inquiry,13(1), 57–78.
Gillett, A., Loader, K., Doherty, B., & Scott, J. M. (2018). An examination of tensions in a hybrid collaboration: A longitudinal study of an empty homes project. Journal of Business Ethics.,157(4), 949–967.
Grimes, M., Williams, T. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2019). Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Academy of Management Review,44(4), 819–845.
Gutiérrez, R., Márquez, P., & Reficco, E. (2016). Configuration and development of alliance portfolios: A comparison of same-sector and cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics,135(1), 55–69.
Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Meesters, A. (2011). Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Development,39(6), 938–948.
Howard, J., & Taylor, M. (2010). Hybridity in partnership working: managing tensions and opportunities. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 175–196). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hudon, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). The ethical crisis in microfinance. Business Ethics Quarterly,23(4), 561–589.
Huybrechts, B., & Haugh, H. (2018). The roles of networks in institutionalizing new hybrid organizational forms: Insights from the European renewable energy cooperative network. Organization Studies,39(8), 1085–1108.
Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2013). The role of legitimacy in social enterprise-corporate collaboration. Social Enterprise Journal,9(2), 130–146.
Huybrechts, B., Nicholls, A., & Edinger, K. (2017). Sacred alliance or pact with the devil? How and why social enterprises collaborate with mainstream businesses in the fair trade sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,29(7–8), 586–608.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal,56(1), 137–159.
Kumar, K., & van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly,20(3), 279–300.
Laville, J.-L., Lemaître, A., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Public policies and social enterprises in Europe: the challenge of institutionalization. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London: Routledge.
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal,45, 281–290.
Le Ber, M., & Branzei, O. (2010a). (Re)Forming strategic cross-sector partnerships relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society,49(1), 140–172.
Le Ber, M., & Branzei, O. (2010b). Towards a critical theory of value creation in cross-sector partnerships. Organization,17(5), 599–629.
Le Ber, M., & Branzei, O. (2010c). Value frame fusion in cross sector interactions. Journal of Business Ethics,94(1), 163–195.
Le Pennec, M., & Raufflet, E. (2018). Value creation in inter-organizational collaboration: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics,148(4), 817–834.
Lee, M., & Battilana, J. (2013). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper 14(5).
Litrico, J.-B., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Unpacking variation in hybrid organizational forms: Changing models of social enterprise among nonprofits, 2000–2013. Journal of Business Ethics,159(2), 343–360.
Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies,36(6), 713–739.
Mason, C., & Doherty, B. (2016). A fair trade-off? Paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics,136(3), 451–469.
McMullen, J. S. (2018). Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business Venturing,33(5), 575–590.
McMullin, C., & Skelcher, C. (2018). The impact of societal-level institutional logics on hybridity: Evidence from nonprofit organizations in England and France. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,29(5), 911–924.
Mongelli, L., Rullani, F., Ramus, T., & Rimac, T. (2019). The bright side of hybridity: Exploring how social enterprises manage and leverage their hybrid nature. Journal of Business Ethics,159(2), 301–305.
Murphy, M., Arenas, D., & Batista, J. M. (2015). Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: The roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics,130(1), 145–162.
Nicholls, A., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Sustaining inter-organizational relationships across institutional logics and power asymmetries: The case of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics,135(4), 699–714.
O’Regan, K. M., & Oster, S. M. (2000). Nonprofit and for-profit partnerships: Rationale and challenges of cross-sector contracting. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,29(1), 120–140.
Ometto, M. P., Gegenhuber, T., Winter, J., & Greenwood, R. (2019). From balancing missions to mission drift: The role of the institutional context, spaces, and compartmentalization in the scaling of social enterprises. Business & Society,58(5), 1003–1046.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review,35(3), 455–476.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal,56(4), 972–1001.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders matter: How social enterprises address mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics,143(2), 307–322.
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. (2017). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal,60(4), 1253–1284.
Raynolds, L. T. (2009). Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: From partnership to traceability. World Development,37(6), 1083–1093.
Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics,85, 413–429.
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management,31(6), 849–873.
Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2019). A framework for exploring the degree of hybridity in social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives,33(4), 491–512.
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration,93(2), 433–448.
Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly,64(1), 1–44.
Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly,23(3), 407–442.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review,36(2), 381–403.
Stadtler, L. (2018). Tightrope walking: Navigating competition in multi-company cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics,148(2), 329–345.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. The American Journal of Sociology,105(3), 801–843.
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Haugh, H. (2005). Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics,58(4), 327–344.
van Hille, I., de Bakker, F. G. A., Ferguson, J. E., & Groenewegen, P. (2019). Navigating tensions in a cross-sector social partnership: How a convener drives change for sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,26(2), 317–329.
van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships: Four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. Journal of Business Ethics,135(1), 1–17.
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy,46(10), 1755–1768.
Vurro, C., Dacin, T., & Perrini, F. (2010). Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: How institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics,94(1), 39–53.
Weidner, K., Weber, C., & Göbel, M. (2019). You scratch my back and I scratch yours: Investigating inter-partner legitimacy in relationships between social enterprises and their key partners. Business & Society,58(3), 493–532.
Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review,42(3), 437–460.
Research Involving Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Savarese, C., Huybrechts, B. & Hudon, M. The Influence of Interorganizational Collaboration on Logic Conciliation and Tensions Within Hybrid Organizations: Insights from Social Enterprise–Corporate Collaborations. J Bus Ethics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04557-7
- Hybrid organization
- Social enterprise
- Interorganizational collaboration
- Institutional logics
- Inter-logic tensions