Abstract
Western representation of countries from the Global South implies a dichotomist view of business ethics: on the one hand, universal ethics largely reproduces commonsensical views of the South as ‘less ethical’, and on the other hand, voices from the South are often conditioned to present themselves as substantially indigenous and unambiguous to be accepted as legitimate ethical subjects. We join the growing interest in bridging this gap by drawing on studies from human geography, and ask to what extent the materiality of moral dilemmas bespeaks the disputed underpinning ethical values of a given space. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s perspective of the production of social space, we outline and apply the idea of ‘spatial ethics’ to organizations, in order to approach the entanglement between center and periphery. We analyze organizations in favelas (Brazilian slums), which are, for many authors, territories where experiences are extreme, and poverty and violence mix with vibrant culture and ingenuity. We critically approach the field of business ethics and suggest that one way of moving beyond the North–South debate is to consider that ethics cannot be transmitted or represented in empty milieus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldry, C. (1999). Space—The final frontier. Sociology, 33(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038599000346.
Barnett, C. (2011). Geography and ethics: Placing life in the space of reasons. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510397463.
Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411401946.
Bonfiglioli, S. (2016). Moral re-turns in geography. Chora. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515627018.
Burgos, M. B. (2006). Dos parques proletários ao Favela-Bairro: as políticas públicas nas favelas do Rio de Janeiro. In A. Zaluar & M. Alvito (Eds.), Um século de favela. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Brenkert, G. G. (2018). Mind the gap! The challenges and limits of (Global) business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3902-6.
Clegg, S. R., & Kornberger, M. (2006). Space, Organizations and management theory. Frederiksberg: CBS Press.
Conrad, L., & Richter, N. (2013). Materiality at work: A note on desks. Ephemera: Theory Politics in Organization, 13(1), 117–136.
Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055940.
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dale, K., Kingma, S., & Wasserman, V. (2018). Organisational space and beyond: The significance of Henri Lefebvre for organisation studies. London: Routledge.
Fahy, K. M., Easterby-Smith, M., & Lervik, J. E. (2014). The power of spatial and temporal orderings in organizational learning. Management Learning, 45(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612471925.
Faria, A., Ibarra-Colado, E., & Guedes, A. (2010). Internationalization of management, neoliberalism and the Latin America challenge. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 6(2/3), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041011049932.
Fessler, D. M. T., Clark Barrett, H., Kanovsky, M., Stich, S., Holbrook, C., Henrich, J., et al. (2015). Moral parochialism and contextual contingency across seven societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0907.
Freire-Medeiros, B., Vilarouca, M. G., & Menezes, P. (2013). International tourists in a “pacified” favela: Profiles and attitudes. The case of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro. Die Erde, 144(2), 147–159.
Hamington, M. (2019). Integrating care ethics and design thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 91–103.
Hancock, P., & Spicer, A. (2011). Academic architecture and the constitution of the new model worker. Culture and Organization, 17(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2011.544885.
Hofman, A. (2015). How time, space and authority figures influence your moral judgment. Smithsonian.com. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-time-space-and-authority-figures-influence-your-moral-judgment-180956163/
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406065851.
IBGE. (2012). Sintese de Indicadores Sociais: Uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira 2012. Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved November 29, 2013 from, https://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/indicadoresminimos/sinteseindicsociais2012/default.shtm.
Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z. (2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a postcolonial interrogative space in Organization studies. Organization, 18(3), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411398996.
Khan, F. R., & Naguib, R. (2017). Epistemic healing: A critical ethical response to epistemic violence in business ethics. Published online. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3555-x.
Kolb, R. (2008). Colonialism. In R. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of business ethics and society (Vol. 1, pp. 347–350). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lacerda, D. S. (2015). Rio de Janeiro and the divided state: Analysing the political discourse on favelas. Discourse & Society, 26(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514541346.
Lacerda, D. S. (2016). The production of spatial hegemony as statecraft: An attempted passive revolution in the favelas of Rio. Third World Quarterly, 37(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109437.
Lefebvre, H. (1958). Critique of everyday life (Vol. 1). London: Verso.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (1995). Critique of everyday life (Vol. 2). London: Verso.
Lefebvre, H. (2008). Critique of everyday life—From modernity to modernism (Vol. 3). London: Verso.
Machado da Silva, L. (2004). Sociabilidade violenta: por uma interpretação da criminalidade contemporânea no Brasil urbano. Sociedade e Estado, 19(1), 53–84.
Marx, K. (1852). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (2nd ed.). New York: Progress Publishers.
McEwan, C., & Goodman, M. K. (2010). Place geography and the ethics of care: Introductory remarks on the geographies of ethics, responsibility and care. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668791003778602.
McFarlane, C. (2006). Transnational development networks: Bringing development and postcolonial approaches into dialogue. Geographical Journal, 172(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.
Melé, D., & Sánchez-Runde, C. (2013). Cultural diversity and universal ethics in a global world. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1814-z.
Munro, I., & Jordan, S. (2013). ‘Living Space’ at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe: Spatial tactics and the politics of smooth space. Human Relations, 66(11), 1497–1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713480411.
Murphy, P. E. (1999). Character and virtue ethics in international marketing: An agenda for managers, researchers and educators. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 107–124.
Naude, P. (2019). Decolonising knowledge: Can ubuntu ethics save us from coloniality? Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3763-4.
Nodoushani, O. (2000). Epistemological foundations of management theory and research methodology. Human Systems Management, 19(1), 71–80.
Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12280.
Popke, E. J. (2004). The face of the other: Zapatismo, responsibility and the ethics of deconstruction. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360410001690277.
Raman, K. R. (2017). Subaltern modernity: Kerala, the Eastern theatre of resistance in the global south. Sociology, 51(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516660041.
Sousa Santos, B. (1977). The law of the oppressed: The construction and reproduction of legality in Pasargada. Law & Society Review, 12(1), 5–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3053321
Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760833.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. London: Macmillan.
Srinivas, N. (2012). Epistemic and performative quests for authentic management in India. Organization, 19(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411429398.
Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on Organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x.
Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357381.
Wapshott, R., & Mallett, O. (2012). The spatial implications of homeworking: A Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work. Organization, 19(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411405376.
West, A. (2014). Ubuntu and business ethics: Problems, perspectives and prospects. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 47–61.
Westwood, R. J., & Jack, G. (2007). Manifesto for a postcolonial international business and management studies. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 3(3), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422040710775021.
Zaluar, A., & Alvito, M. (2006). Um Século de Favela. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Funding
The study was partly funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Grant Number 1028/12-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacerda, D.S., Meira, F.B. & Brulon, V. Spatial Ethics Beyond the North–South Dichotomy: Moral Dilemmas in Favelas. J Bus Ethics 171, 695–707 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04467-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04467-8