Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Religion and Everyday Consumption Ethics: A Moral Economy Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As research on ethical consumers and consumption practices has continued to grow, a complimentary body of work concerned less with ethical consumption but more with ethics in consumption has emerged. Problematizing the divide between ethical and non-ethical consumption, this stream of research focuses on the domain of everyday and explores the moral struggles individuals face while engaging in ordinary consumption practices. However, the attention on the ordinary runs the risk of obscuring the contribution of the ‘extraordinary’ or the transcendental to the ethical concerns embedded in the mundane flow of the everyday. This study addresses this blind spot and explores the ways in which religion is implicated in everyday consumption ethics. In doing so, I go beyond a view of religion as an individual trait and emphasize its role as a major institutional structure of the contemporary political economy. The empirical context of the study is the controversy over the so-called halal nail polish. The debate over the products’ appropriateness for Muslim women provides a fertile setting to explore how an ordinary object becomes an ethical problem amid changing relations between religion and market. In order to trace and analyse the linkages between daily practices and institutional dynamics I draw from the moral economy framework and discuss the multiple and conflicting moral repertoires that shape the ethical evaluations of the object. The study offers several contributions to the existing theorizations of everyday consumption ethics and moral economies of consumption. It also highlights the potential of interdisciplinary approaches in providing a holistic understanding of the ethical and moral dimensions of consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M., & Raisborough, J. (2010). Making a difference: Ethical consumption and the everyday. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adas, E. B. (2006). The making of entrepreneurial Islam and the Islamic spirit of capitalism. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(2), 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, R. A., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, M. K. (2012). The 'nail polish fatwa': Halal beauty market more lucrative than ever. Illume, Dec. 21. Retrieved November 8, 2017.

  • Arif, M. (1985). Toward a definition of Islamic economics: Some scientific considerations. Journal of Research in Islamic Economics, 2, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariztia, T., Agloni, N., & Pellandini-Simanyi, L. (2018). Ethical living: Relinking ethics and consumption through care in Chile and Brazil. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 391–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atia, M. (2012). ‘A way to paradise’: Pious neoliberalism, Islam, and faith-based development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4), 808–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayan, A. (2013). Accessing the global halal market. New York: Createspace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Cafaro, P., & Newholm, T. (2005). Philosophy and ethical consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 11–24). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2011). Globalizing responsibility. The political rationalities of ethical consumption. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeaud-Blackler, F., Fischer, J., & Lever, J. (2016). Halal matters: Islam, politics and markets in global perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, C., & Boeckler, M. (2011). Geographies of markets: Materials, morals and monsters in motion. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. C., Houlihan, M., & Laaser, K. (2012). Contingent work and its contradictions: Towards a moral economy framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. C., & Laaser, K. (2013). Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy. Work, Employment & Society, 27(3), 508–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. G. (2018). Moral economy: What’s in a name. Anthropological Theory, 18(1), 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. G., & Luetchford, P. (Eds.). (2012). Ethical consumption: Social value and economic practice. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2001). Religion, the new millennium, and globalization. Sociology of Religion, 62(4), 415–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciscel, D. H., & Heath, J. A. (2001). To market, to market: Imperial capitalism’s destruction of social capital and the family. Review of Radical Political Economics, 33(4), 401–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (2006). The rough guide to ethical living. London: Rough Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N., Cloke, P., Barnett, C., & Malpass, A. (2008). The spaces and ethics of organic food. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 291–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2001). Millennial capitalism and the culture of neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. (2005). Hillsong: A megachurch in the Sydney suburbs. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, communities and consumption discourse. Consumption Markets and Culture, 6(4), 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daya, S. (2016). Ordinary ethics and craft consumption: A Southern perspective. Geoforum, 74, 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sardan, J. O. (1999). A moral economy of corruption in Africa? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(1), 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, C. J. (2009). The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (2005). Bringing the moral economy back in to the study of 21st-century transnational peasant movements. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Guindi, F. (1999). Veil: Modesty, privacy and resistance. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2009). Moral economies revisited. Cairn. Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://www.cairn-int.info/article_p.php?ID_ARTICLE=E_ANNA_646_1237.

  • Fischer, J. (2009). Proper Islamic consumption: Shopping among the Malays in modern Malaysia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. (2011). The halal frontier: Muslim consumers in a globalized market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the internet. American Association for the Advancement of Science Workshop Report. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from https://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/srfl/projects/intres.main.html.

  • Fridell, G. (2006). Fair trade and the international moral economy: Within and against the market. In T. Shallcross & J. Robinson (Eds.), Global citizenship and environmental justice (pp. 81–94). Rodopi: Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, F., Martikainen, T., & Woodhead, L. (2013). Acknowledging a globalshift: A primer for thinking about religion in consumer societies. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökarıksel, B., & Secor, A. (2010). Between fashion and tesettür: Marketing and consuming women's Islamic dress. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 6(3), 118–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökarıksel, B., & Secor, A. J. (2009). New transnational geographies of Islamism, capitalism and subjectivity: The veiling-fashion industry in Turkey. Area, 41(1), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. K. (2004). Reading fair trade: Political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of fair trade foods. Political Geography, 23(7), 891–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. K., Maye, D., & Holloway, L. (2010). Ethical foodscapes? Premises, promises, and possibilities. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1782–1796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, N. (2015). ‘Moral economy’: Its conceptual history and analytical prospects. Journal of Global Ethics, 11(2), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. M. (2011). Exploring the ‘ethical everyday’: An ethnography of the ethics of family consumption. Geoforum, 42(6), 627–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, C. (2018). Moral(ity and) economy: Work, workfare, and fairness in provincial Hungary. European Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (Eds.). (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R. W. (2010). Religious resurgence in contemporary Asia: Southeast Asian perspectives on capitalism, the state, and the new piety. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(4), 1031–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultsman, J. (1995). Just tourism: An ethical framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(3), 553–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatow, G., Johnson, L., & Madanipour, A. (2014). Global system theory and ‘market-friendly’ religion. Globalizations, 11(6), 827–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglot Cosmetics USA. (2013). INGLOT O2M nail enamel water permeability proven in a lab test. Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNICpXSWd00.

  • Jackson, P., Ward, N., & Russell, P. (2009). Moral economies of food and geographies of responsibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(1), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, A., & Süerdem, A. (2012). An analysis of material consumption culture in the Muslim world. Marketing Theory, 12(1), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeldtoft, N. (2011). Lived Islam: Religious identity with ‘non-organized’ Muslim minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(7), 1134–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, A.T. (2007). Addressing the Muslim market. Retrieved September 5, 2016, from https://www.atkearney.com/images/global/pdf/AddressingMuslimMarket_S.pdf.

  • Khan, M. F. (1995). Essays in Islamic economics. London: Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofti, D. (2016). Moral economy of flexible production: Fabricating precarity between the conveyor belt and the household. Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 433–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: The marketer’s secret ingredient. Cambridge, MA: MIT Technology Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuever, E. (2019). Moral imaginings of the market and the state in contemporary China. Economic Anthropology, 6, 98–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. (2010). Introduction. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action (pp. 1–36). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2010). Marketing Muslim lifestyle: A new media genre. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 6(3), 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., & Potter, E. (2011). Ethical consumption: A critical introduction. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety. Princeton: University of Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D., Holloway, L., & Kneafsey, M. (Eds.). (2007). Alternative food geographies: Representation and practice. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, E., Miller, J., & Phillips, B. J. (2013). The megaphone effect: Taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 136–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1998). A theory of shopping. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilizing the consumer. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhawar, I. (Ed.). (1995). Islamic perspectives on sustainable development. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, J., & Clarke, J. (2018). The instabilities of expertise Remaking knowledge, power and politics in unsettled times. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy and Mather. (2010). Brands, Islam and the new Muslim consumer. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from https://www.ogilvy.com/News/Press-Releases/May-2010-The-Global-Rise-of-the-New-Muslim-Consumer.aspx.

  • Osella, F., & Osella, C. (2009). Muslim entrepreneurs in public life between India and the Gulf: Making good and going good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15, S202–S221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özcaglar-Toulouse, N., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2006). In search of fair trade: Ethical consumer decision making in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 502–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomera, J., & Vetta, T. (2016). Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept. Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellandini-Simanyi, L. (2014). Consumption norms and everyday ethics. New York: Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, T., & Horvath, A. (2014). Reassessing expert knowledge and the politics of expertise. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957[1944]). The great transformation. New York: Rhinehart.

  • Popke, J. (2006). Geography and ethics: Everyday mediations through care and consumption. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 504–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redden, G. (2016). Revisiting the spiritual supermarket: Does the commodification of spirituality necessarily devalue it? Culture and Religion, 17(2), 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2010). Pentecostal networks and the spirit of globalization: On the social productivity of ritual forms. In B. Kapferer, K. Telly, & A. Eriksen (Eds.), In Contemporary religiosities: Emergent socialities and the post-nation-state (pp. 55–65). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2016). What is the matter with transcendence? On the place of religion in the new anthropology of ethics. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnyckyj, D. (2009). Spiritual economies: Islam and neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(1), 104–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandikci, O. (2018). Religion and the marketplace: Constructing the ‘new’ Muslim consumer. Religion, 48(3), 453–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandikci, O., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2000). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzkopf, S. (2011). The political theology of consumer sovereignty: Towards an ontology of consumer society. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(3), 106–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1998). The overspent American: Downshifting and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Carrington, M., & Chatzidakis, A. (2016). Ethics and morality in consumption: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 8). Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17(2/3), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, F. (2016). Brand Islam: The marketing and commodification of piety. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoni, V. (2016). Economization, moralization, and the changing moral economies of ‘capitalism’ and ‘communism’ among Cuban migrants in Spain. Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 454–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2010 [1759]). The theory of moral sentiments. Penguin

  • Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P. (2018). Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: Power, expertise and the hegemonic temporalities of austerity. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P., & Zitko, M. (2018). Expertise and the moral economies of austerity. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. (2009). Selling god/saving souls: Religious commodities, spiritual markets and the media. Global Media and Communication, 5(1), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present, 50, 76–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1991). The moral economy reviewed. In E. P. Thompson (Ed.), Customs in common (pp. 259–351). London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters. (2018/2019). State of the Global Islamic Economy. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://haladinar.io/hdn/doc/report2018.pdf.

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentmann, F. (2007). Before ‘fair trade’: Empire, free trade, and the moral economies of food in the modern world. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 25(6), 1079–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, C. (2006). Islam and the moral economy: The challenge of capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo, M. C., & Langa, D. (2010). Effects of family socialization in the organizational commitment of the family firms from the moral economy perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1976). The protestant work ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, K. (2014). Nice save: The moral economies of recycling in England and Sweden. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 704–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, K. (2017a). Moral economies of consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517729007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, K. (2017b). The moral economy of ready-made food. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, R. (2001). Consuming morality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(2), 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. Y., & Pearce, P. L. (2014). Appraising netnography: Towards insights about new markets in the digital tourist era. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(5), 463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, A. (2008). Islamic economics: A survey of literature. Religions and Development Research Programme Working Paper 22-2008, University of Birmingham, UK.

  • Zitko, M. (2018). Governmentality versus moral economy: Notes on the debt crisis. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(1), 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK

    Ozlem Sandikci

Authors
  1. Ozlem Sandikci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozlem Sandikci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ozlem Sandikci declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sandikci, O. Religion and Everyday Consumption Ethics: A Moral Economy Approach. J Bus Ethics 168, 277–293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04422-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation