We investigate the rural resistance of one of the world’s largest social movements, La Via Campesina, as a powerful enactment of radical democracy in practice. More than this, the paper describes how the movement challenges the framework of radical democracy by pointing towards the ethical importance of recognizing the relationship of human dignity with nature and considering ethico-political values inherent in the peasants’ way of living. Their resistance is a rejection of depoliticizing silencing, and their everyday life is a commitment to a “more than human” radical democracy in its most radical sense, as they are always already “in parliament with land”. We conclude by outlining a perspective which is both more than radical and more democratic, considering those who have not yet been heard but also that which, in the light of radical democracy, has never been counted as part of the political body at all: nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
In the following, we will use the term peasants and small-scale farmers interchangeably since we want to highlight their common struggle and argue that they are both intermingled with ‘the land’. This perspective does not aim to obfuscate differences in oppression or living circumstances, but to highlight what they have in common. As the title may indicate, we only speak of those small-scale farmers that feel connected to the movement of La Via Campesina. We do not use the term “family farms” as the term “family” in a normative reading in German contexts is too often related to heteronormative understandings of families (Gioia, 2019).
This violence has many dimensions. It destroys life indirectly when farmers commit suicide due to oppression and dependency caused by companies like Monsanto (Patel, 2006), but also includes explicit forms of direct violence, like the shooting of 19 people by military police officers that happened during demonstrations of the MST movement in Eldorado dos Carajás on the 17th April 1996. More than this, the loss of land means for many peasants the loss of income and food and lead to hunger and starvation. “Death is in fact a recurring theme, and reality, of the peasant struggle in Latin America and the world. It is both the deaths from hunger-related illnesses in impoverished rural areas and the deaths from the on-going criminalisation and repression of peasant struggles” (Martinez-Torrez and Rosset 2010, p.163).
We call into question the underlying connotations of the word ‘environment’. In the discourses which form part of the hegemonic narratives, environment refers to something which is held at a distance. The word supports an anthropocentric perspective which places the human being at the center, surrounded by a passive environment. Precisely this concept is questioned here, in the sense of indigenous and new materialist approaches and of that very entanglement which the peasants practice in their various locations.
For further criticism of the concept of ecological crisis, see Plumwood (2002).
Agarwal, B. (1994). A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Alaimo, S. (2012). Sustainable this, sustainable that: New materialisms, posthumanism, and unknown futures. PMLA,127(3), 558–564.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2014). On Touching—The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. In S. Witzgall & K. Stakemeier (Eds.), Power of material/politics of materiality (pp. 153–164). Zürich: Diaphanes.
Bauriedl, S. (2015). Vokabular des Stillstands. Ein Interview mit Sybille Bauriedl über die aktuelle Klimapolitik und die Macht der Worte. RobinWood,127, 24–25.
Bello, W. (2007). Foreword. In A. A. Desmarais (Ed.), La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants (pp. 3–5). London: Pluto Press.
Bennett, J. (2005). In Parliament with things. In L. Tønder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy. Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 133–148). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Böhm, S., Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2008). Infra-political dimensions of resistance to international business: A Neo-Gramscian approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management,24(3), 169–182.
Borras, S. M. (2008). La Vía Campesina and its Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform. Journal of Agrarian Change,8(2–3), 258–289.
Borras, S. M. (2004). La Vía Campesina: An evolving transnational social movement. Transnational Briefing Series No 2004/6.
Bové, J. (2001). A Movement of Movements? A Farmers’ International? New Left Review,12, 89–101.
Brand, U. (2009). Die Multiple Krise. Dynamik und Zusammenhang der Krisendimensionen, Anforderungen an politische Institutionen und Chancen progressiver Politik, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Berlin.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory,13(2), 210–223.
Corcoran, S. (2010). Editor’s Introduction. In J. Rancière, Dissensus On politics and aesthetics (pp. 1–34). London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Oxford: Wiley.
Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (Eds.) (2010). Introducing the new materialism. In New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–46). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Davis, H.; Todd, Z. (2017). On the Importance of a Date, or Decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780.
Davy, B. (2009). The poor and the land: Poverty, property, planning. Town Planning Review,80(3), 227–265.
de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2015). Making time for soil. Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 691–716.
de La Cadena, M. (2015). Uncommoning nature. E-Flux Journal 56th Biennale. Retrieved May 01, 2019, from http://supercommunity.e-flux.com/texts/uncommoning-nature.
Desmarais, A. A. (2007). La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. London: Pluto Press.
Desmarais, A. A. (2008). The power of peasants: Reflections on the meanings of La Via Campesina. Journal of Rural Studies,24(2), 138–149.
Dinerstein, A. C. (2012). Interstitial revolution: On the explosive fusion of negativity and hope. Capital & Class,36(3), 521–540.
Edelman, M. (2003). Transnational peasant and farmer movements and networks. Global civil society,2003, 185–220.
Edelman, M., & Borras, S. M. (2016). Political dynamics of transnational agrarian movements. Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.
Escobar, A. (2004): Beyond the Third World. Imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230.
Flügel-Martinsen, O. (2017). Befragungen des Politischen. Subjektkonstitution—Gesellschaftsordnung—radikale Demokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Folkers, A. (2013). Was ist neu am neuen Materialismus? Von der Praxis zum Ereignis. In T. Goll, D. Keil, & T. Telios (Eds.), Critical Matter. Diskussionen eines neuen Materialismus (pp. 16–33). Münster: Edition Assemblage.
Fontoura, Y., Bharucha, Z. P., & Böhm, S. (2016). A transnational agri-food system for whom? The struggle for hegemony at RIO + 20. Revista de Administração de Empresas.,56(4), 424–437.
Friant, M. C., & Langmore, J. (2015). The buen vivir. A policy to survive the anthropocene?. Global Policy, 6(1), 64–71.
Gioia, P. (2019). Coming out! Gender Diversity in the Food System. In Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 11 (pp. 34–41). Heidelberg, FIAN International and Brot für die Welt
Gioia, P., Redecker, S.v. (2018). Queerfeldein. Queerfeministische Perspektiven auf die Bewegung für Ernährungssouveränität. Dossier Ernährungssouveränität, LuXemburg, June 2018. Retrieved June 27, 2019, from https://www.zeitschrift-luxemburg.de/queerfeldein.
González, P. A., Vázquez, A. M. (2015). An ontological turn in the debate on Buen Vivir—Sumak Kawsay in Ecuador. Ideology, Knowledge, and the Common. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 10(3), 315–334.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2016). Organization Studies and Epistemic Coloniality in Latin America. Thinking Otherness from the Margins. Organization,13(4), 463–488.
Kimmerer, R. (2017). Speaking of nature. In: Orionmagazine.org. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from https://orionmagazine.org/article/speaking-of-nature/.
La Via Campesina (2015a) Seed laws that criminalise farmers. Resistance and fightback. La Via Campesina International Peasant Movement & GRAIN, Harare/Girona. Retrieved March 01, 2019, from https://viacampesina.org/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/04/2015-Seed%20laws%20booklet%20EN.pdf.
La Via Campesina (2015b) Peasant Agroecology. For Food Sovereignty and Mother Earth. Experiences of La Via Campesina. La Via Campesina International Peasant Movement, Harare. Retrieved January 23, 2019, from https://viacampesina.org/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/CUADERNO%207%20LA%20VIA%20CAMPESINA%20INGLES.compressed.pdf.
La Via Campesina (2017a). Food Sovereignty is the true solution to uphold Peoples’ Right to Climate Justice. Retrieved June 27, 2018, from https://viacampesina.org/en/press-release-food-sovereignty-is-the-true-solution-to-uphold-peoples-right-to-climate-justice/.
La Via Campesina. (2017b). Struggles of La Via Campesina. For agrarian reform and the defense of life, land and territories. Harare: La: Via Campesina International Peasant Movement.
La Via Campesina (2018). Food Sovereignty Now! A guide to Food Sovereignty. European Coordination of La Via Campesina, Brüssel. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://www.eurovia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/FINAL-EN-FoodSov-A5-rev6.pdf.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
Lanka, S. V.; Khadaroo, I.; Böhm, S. (2017). Agroecology accounting. Biodiversity and sustainable livelihoods from the margins. Account Auditing Accountability Journal, 30 (7), 1592–1613.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Martínez-Torres, M. E.; Rosset, P. M. (2010). La Vía Campesina. The birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 149–175.
Machin, A. (2013). Negotiating climate change: Radical democracy and the illusion of consensus. London: Zed Books.
Maia, João M. (2011). Space, social theory and peripheral imagination. Brazilian intellectual history and de-colonial debates. International Sociology, 26(3), 392–407.
Marchart, O. (2014): The art of preenactments. Lecture 09.07.2014 HZT Hochschulübergreifendes Zentrum Tanz Berlin. Retrieved February 26, 2019, from https://vimeo.com/114242197.
Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D., & Scheidel, A. (2016). Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies,43(3), 731–755.
McKeon, N. (2015). La Via Campesina: The ‘Peasants’ Way’to Changing the System, not the Climate. Journal of World-Systems Research,21(2), 241–249.
McMichael, P. (2011). Reframing development. Global peasant movements and the New Agrarian Question. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 27(4), 471–483.
Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: coloniality, border thinking and subaltern knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke: Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W., & Escobar, A. (2013). Globalization and the decolonial option. 1. Issued in paperback. London: Routledge.
Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,104(33), 13268–13272.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London/New Nork: Routledge.
Mouffe, C. (2008). Critique as counter-hegemonic intervention. Transversal multilingual Web Journal. The art of critique. Retrieved June 27, 2018, from http://eipcp.net/transversal/0808/mouffe/en.
Mouffe, C. (2010). Postdemokratie und die zunehmende Entpolitisierung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte,1–2(61), 3–5.
Myers, N. (2018). How to grow liveable worlds. Ten not-so-easy Steps. In: Oliver-Smith, Kerry: The world to come. Art in the age of the Anthropocene (pp. 53–63). Gainesville: Samuel P. Harn Museum of Art, University of Florida.
Ndlovu, M. (2014). Why indigenous knowledges in the 21st century? A decolonial turn. Yesterday and Today,11, 84–98.
Nyéléni 2007—Forum for Food Sovereignty (2007). Declaration of Nyéléni. Retrieved June 27, 2019, from https://nyeleni.org/spip.php?article331.
Pahnke, A., Tarlau, R., & Wolford, W. (2015). Understanding rural resistance: Contemporary mobilization in the Brazilian countryside. The Journal of Peasant Studies,42(6), 1069–1085.
Patel, R. (2006). International agrarian restructuring and the practical ethics of peasant movement solidarity. Journal of Asian and African Studies,41(1–2), 71–93.
Penniman, L. (2018). Farming While Black. Soul Fire Farm’s Practical Guide to Liberation on the Land. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Are Latin American peasant movements still a force for change? Some new paradigms revisited. Journal of Peasant Studies,28(2), 83–118.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture. The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2010). Nature in the active voice. Climate Change and Philosophy: Transformational Possibilities,2010, 32–47.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology,15(2), 215–232.
Rancière, J. (1997). Demokratie und Postdemokratie. In Riha, R., (ed.), Politik der Wahrheit (pp. 94–122). Wien: turia&kant.
Rancière, J., & Corcoran, S. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ranta, E. M. (2016). Toward a decolonial alternative to development? The emergence and shortcomings of vivir bien as state policy in bolivia in the era of globalization. Globalizations,13(4), 425–439.
Redecker, E. v. (2018). Praxis und Revolution: Eine Sozialtheorie radikalen. Wandels, Campus Verlag.
Rosset, P. (2011). Food sovereignty and alternative paradigms to confront land grabbing and the food and climate crises. Development,54(1), 21–30.
Roth, K., & Ladwig, B. (2006). Recht auf Widerstand? Ideengeschichtliche und philosophische Perspektiven. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Theory, culture & society,27(2–3), 213–232.
Swyngedouw, E. (2013). The non-political politics of climate change. An International Journal for Critical Geographies,12(1), 1–8.
Tønder, L., & Thomassen, L. (Eds.). (2005). Radical democracy. Politics between abundance and lack. Manchester, New York: Manchester Univ. Press.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) (2017). Global Land Outlook. Bonn.
Veltmeyer, H. (2010). Dynamics of agrarian transformation and resistance. Revista NERA,17(13), 29–48.
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans. Re-visiones,38(7), 1–22.
Westphal, M. (2013). Pluralismus und Antagonismus. Chantal Mouffes agonale Demokratietheorie, Preprints and Working Papers of the Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject. The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
von Redecker, S., Herzig, C. The Peasant Way of a More than Radical Democracy: The Case of La Via Campesina. J Bus Ethics 164, 657–670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04402-6
- Decolonial practice
- Post-anthropocentric radical democracy
- Agrarian political ecology
- Human-soil relations
- Peasant resistance