Skip to main content
Log in

A Normative Meaning of Meaningful Work

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on meaningful work has not embraced a shared definition of what it is, in part because many researchers and laypersons agree that it means different things to different people. However, subjective and social accounts of meaningful work have limited practical value to help people pursue it and to help scholars study it. The account of meaningful work advanced in this paper is inherently normative. It recognizes the relevance of subjective experience and social agreement to appraisals of meaningfulness but considers them conceptually incomplete and practically limited. According to this normative account, meaningful work should be meaningful to oneself and to others and is also meaningful independent of them. It sets forth grounds for evaluating some work to be more meaningful than other work, asserting the possibility that one could be mistaken about the meaningfulness of one’s work. While it thus proscribes some claims to meaningful work, it also opens up potential new avenues of inquiry into, among other things, self-aggrandizing and harmful work that is experienced as meaningful, morally valuable work that is not experienced as meaningful, and the distinction between experienced and normative meaningfulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At the time the film was made, the Three Gorges Dam was the world’s largest hydroelectric project. It was conceived by leaders going as far back as Sun Yat-Sen, China’s first post-imperial leader, and championed by Mao Tse-Tung early in his administration for both its symbolic value (technological and economic advancement, and humanity’s ability to control nature) and its humanitarian value (taming “China’s sorrow”—a river that brought floods, death, and devastation throughout its history—and bringing electricity to millions of rural poor) (Dai and Sullivan 1999). Throughout its construction and since its completion, it has been the subject of controversy because of environmental concerns (despite being the source of so-called clean energy, it disrupted the natural ecology and became the source of potentially unintended consequences such as sedimentary deposits that choked off natural life) and social concerns (including the flooding of cultural treasures and of villages requiring the displacement of millions of people leaving ancestral homes in exchange for modern, sterile apartments) (Hvistendahl 2008). While Up the Yangtze focuses on the narratives of Cindy and Jerry, the narrative of the dam itself and its stakeholders is a larger subject of the film.

  2. Wolf’s demand for objective attractiveness may less familiar to empirical social scientists who endeavor to study what work is experienced and perceived as meaningful, not necessarily whether or why they may be right or wrong to experience and perceive it as such. Among philosophers today studying the meaningfulness of life, however, “a majority…are objectivists of some kind, aiming to detect a common denominator [cf. my generalizability criterion for a definition] among the various ways of living in the physical world that confer meaning at least partially in virtue of mind-independent factors” (Metz 2013, p. 181). However, in meaningful work scholarship, ethicists have not only typically left “meaningful” to be defined by the beholder; they have also typically (with the notable exception of Veltman 2016) used “objective” in a different sense: to refer to the “moral conditions” of work, such as being “treated with dignity and respect” (Ciulla 2000, p. 225)—that is, the “external, objective context that shapes and legitimizes what may be considered meaningful by the individual” (Bailey et al. 2018a, p. 11), in a system in which the worker is treated as a “factor of production” (Pope John Paul II 1981). It is also important to distinguish my use of “objective” from that of Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, to which it is in some ways diametrically opposed, including to Randian Objectivism’s precept that the moral purpose of life is to pursue egoistic happiness.

References

  • 9/11 Commission. (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report: Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

  • Allen, R. E. (1984). The early dialogues of Plato. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlidge, J., & Beresford, P. (2009, November 8). Inside the goldmine. Sunday Times

  • Arneson, R. J. (1987). Meaningful work and market socialism. Ethics, 97, 517–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2005). Intrinsic value and meaningful life. Philosophical Papers, 34, 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., Lips-Wiersma, M., Madden, A., Yeoman, R., Thompson, M., & Chalofsky, N. (2018a). The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special issue of ‘Meaningful Work: Prospects for the 21st Century”. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 481–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). What makes work meaningful—or meaningless. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(4), 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., Yeoman, R., Madden, A., Thompson, M., & Kerridge, G. (2018b). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318804653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R., & Knight, K. (2012). Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J. E., & Torbert, W. (2003). The false duality of work and leisure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 158–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1083–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogaard, B., & Smith, B. (2005). On luck, responsibility, and the meaning of life. Philosophical Papers, 34, 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the dual edges of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 32–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care, N. (1984). Career choice. Ethics, 94, 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (Writer and Director). (2007). Up the Yangtze (Documentary). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: EyeSteelFilm, the National Film Board of Canada, et al. (Co-Production); Zeitgeist Films (Distribution in the USA).

  • Ciulla, J. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern work. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J. (2003). On the meaning of life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (2009). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Q., & Sullivan, L. R. (1999). The Three Gorges Dam and China’s energy dilemma. Journal of International Affairs, 53(1), 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, J. (2017). Will life be worth living in a world without work? Technological unemployment and the meaning of life. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 424–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrow, S. R. (2013). Dynamics of calling: A longitudinal study of musicians. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64, 1001–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. D., Autin, K. L., England, J. W., Douglass, R. P., & Gensmer, N. P. (2018a). Examining the effects of contextual variables on living a calling over time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. D., Douglass, R. P., Gensmer, N. P., England, J. W., & Kim, H. J. (2018b). An initial examination of the work as a calling theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(3), 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. M. (2005). Free will, death, and immortality: The role of narrative. Philosophical Papers, 34, 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2016). Success and luck: Good fortune and the myth of meritocracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, Inc. (2017). State of the American workplace. https://news.gallup.com/reports/199961/state-american-workplace-report-2017.aspx.

  • Gini, A. (2001). My job, my self: Work and the creation of the modern individual. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11, 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2011). How customers can rally your troops: End users can energize your workforce far better than your managers can. Harvard Business Review, 89, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D., & Lee, K. (2007). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N. (2005). Rawlsian justice and workplace republicanism. Social Theory and Practice, 31, 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N. (2008). Justice in production. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16, 72–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, A. (2014). The purpose economy. Seattle: Imperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvistendahl, M. (2008, March 25). China’s Three Gorges Dam: An environmental catastrophe? Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinas-three-gorges-dam-disaster/.

  • James, L. (2005). Achievement and the meaningfulness of life. Philosophical Papers, 34, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. W., & Scheller-Wolf, A. A. (2019). Technological employment, meaning in life, purpose of business, and the future of stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepisto, D. A., & Pratt, M. G. (2017). Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organizational Psychology Review, 7, 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and ‘management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 491–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2018). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, I. (1989). Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 951–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2005). Introduction (to a special issue on meaning in life). Philosophical Papers, 34, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2011). The good, the true, and the beautiful: Toward a unified account of great meaning in life. Religious Studies, 47, 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2012). The meaningful and the worthwhile: Clarifying the relationships. Philosophical Forum, 43(4), 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2005). Meaningful motivation for work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2009). Teaching meaningful work: Philosophical discussions on the ethics of career choice. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 6, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2019). Do we have to do meaningful work? In R. Yeoman, C. Bailey, A. Madden, & M. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of meaningful work (pp. 117–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C., Pratt, M. G., Grant, A. M., & Dunn, C. P. (2014). Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2019). Serving self or serving others: Close relations’ perspectives on the ethics of calling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1991). Can’t we make moral judgments?. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. (2009). Rawls, self-respect, and the opportunity for meaningful work. Social Theory and Practice, 35, 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. (2010). Participation in the workplace: Are employees special? Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morson, G. S. (2007). ‘Anna Karenina’ in our time: Seeing more wisely. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, J. (1994). Money and the meaning of life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, B. (2001, March 8). The players. Bassist David Grossman: ‘Not a 9-to-5 job’. https://www.cnn.com/2001/CAREER/trends/03/08/nyphil.bass/index.html.

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen, G. A., Lepak, D., Ashcraft, K. L., Labianca, G., Smith, V., & Steensma, H. K. (2013). Theories of work and working today. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J. (1952). Leisure: The basis of culture. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2014). Vocation of the business leader: A reflection. https://www.stthomas.edu/media/catholicstudies/center/ryan/publications/publicationpdfs/vocationofthebusinessleaderpdf/PontificalCouncil_4.pdf.

  • Pope John Paul II. 1981. Laborem exercens. Encyclical on human work.

  • Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 308–327). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransome, P. (1996). The work paradigm: A theoretical investigation of concepts of work. Aldershot, Hants, England: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress: Philosophical papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, K. P. (2001). Philosophy and the problems of work: A reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (2017). Google spent two years studying 180 teams. The most successful ones shared these 5 traits. Inc., 19 July. https://www.inc.com/michael-schneider/google-thought-they-knew-how-to-create-the-perfect.html.

  • Schor, J. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. (1982). Meaningful work. Ethics, 92, 634–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seachris, J. W. (Ed.). (2013). General introduction to Exploring the meaning of life: An anthology and guide. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, R., & Kirby, J. (2017). Meaningful work should not be a privilege of the elite. Harvard Business Review, April 3.

  • Taylor, R. (2000). Good and evil. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (2005). Morality and a meaningful life. Philosophical Papers, 34, 405–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. (2002). On the meaning of life. Belmont, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti-Kharas, J., & Michaelson, C. (2019). To mean is to be perceived: Studying the meaning of work through the eyes of others. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. D. (2005). Family history. Philosophical Papers, 34, 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, A. (2016). Meaningful work. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. J. (1994). Meaningful work as a distributive good. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 32, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, K. P., & Schaffert, C. (2019). Generational differences in definitions of meaningful work: A mixed methods study. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 1045–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, R. (2014). Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, R., Bailey, C., Madden, A., & Thompson, M. (2019). Introduction to The Oxford handbook of meaningful work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks participants in sessions at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, May Meaning Meeting, New York University, Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting, University of St. Thomas, and the Vrije Universiteit Meaningful Work Conference for conversations that inspired and informed this paper. The author also thanks the JBE editor and anonymous reviewers for detailed, supportive, and challenging commentary and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Michaelson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that s/he has no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

This conceptual paper does not contain any studies regarding which informed consent would be necessary.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michaelson, C. A Normative Meaning of Meaningful Work. J Bus Ethics 170, 413–428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04389-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04389-0

Keywords

Navigation