Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some Virtue Ethics Implications from Aristotelian and Confucian Perspectives on Family and Business

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Not only individuals and firms, but also families engage in business as a social activity and this is true beyond the case of family businesses. Cultural differences in the way families are construed might influence the way they do business. There are different types of families, and among these are those described by Aristotelian and Confucian traditions, representing the West and the East respectively. The literature on virtue in business has been dominated by a Western—mainly Aristotelian—tradition (Ferrero and Sison in Bus Ethics Eur Rev 30(1): 8–24, 2014), neglecting the role of the family and focusing on the individual. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by explaining differences and similarities in the normative evaluation of certain family-related business attitudes and practices, in light of Confucian and Aristotelian virtue ethics standards. After comparing the structure, organization and dynamics of Aristotelian and Confucian families, we shall draw some inferences regarding “virtuous” or excellent business practices—such as nepotism, bribery, gift-giving and guanxi and attitudes—on codified rules or written norms. For this analysis we shall make use of Aristotelian and Confucian ethical accounts as well as inputs from Family Science applied to organizations, which provides conceptual categories to compare the two traditions. Thus we hope to contribute not only to the comparative study of Aristotelian and Confucian virtue ethics in business, but also to the understanding of the distinctive role of families, raising cultural awareness for what may be considered virtuous business practices according to the Aristotelian and Confucian traditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angle, S., & Slote, M. (2013). Virtue ethics and Confucianism. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics (trans: Irwin, T.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

  • Aristotle, (1990). The politics. Stephen Everson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacallao, M. L., & Smokowski, P. R. (2007). The costs of getting ahead: Mexican family system changes after immigration. Family Relations,56(1), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology,4, 1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family,53, 856–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,122(4), 1351–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boz, A., & Ergeneli, A. (2014). Women entrepreneurs’ personality characteristics and parents’ parenting style profile in Turkey. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,109, 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, G. K. Y. (2008). The relevance and value of Confucianism in contemporary business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,77, 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W. K., & Hamilton, G. (2001). Social logic as business logic: Guanxi, trustworthiness and the embeddedness of chinese business practices. In R. P. Appelbaum, W. L. F. Felstiner, & V. Gessner (Eds.), Rules and networks: The legal culture of global business transactions (pp. 302–349). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1991). The nature of the firm: meaning. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution and development (pp. 48–60). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Lee, J., Stafford, K., & Heck, R. K. Z. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: An extension of sustainable family business theory. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,13, 229–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, E. (1957). Family development. New York, NY: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review,30(1), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review,23(4), 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2004). Family communication patterns theory: Observations on its development and application. Journal of Family Communication,4, 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family. Human Communication Research,20(3), 275–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, J. W., Davis-Blake, A., & Sanders, W. M. (2010). Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management Journal,31, 1031–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.

  • Fu, P.-J. (2008). Confucianism: Constructs of classical thought. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy.

  • Gates, L., Lineberger, M. R., Crockett, J., & Hubbard, J. (1988). Birth order and its relationship to depression, anxiety, and self-concept test scores in children. Journal of Genetic Psychology,149, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. D., & Wang, G. (2012). Virtues and leadership. An integrating conceptual framework founded in Aristotelian and Confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision,50(5), 868–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, M.C., Díaz, A.V.P., & Suaza, L.M. (2003). La identidad nacional en los textos escolares de ciencias sociales: Colombia: 1900-1950. U. Pedagógica Nacional.

  • Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2010). Social capital, Chinese style: Individualism, relational collectivism and the cultural embeddedness of the institutions–performance link. China Economic Journal,2(3), 325–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress: Adjustment to the crisis of war separation and reunion. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucian connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics,16(4), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L. N. (1999). Family communication patterns and personality characteristics. Communication Quarterly,47, 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, D. B., Golemon, P. L., Chen, Y., Wang, T.-S., & Hung, W.-S. (2009). Guanxi and business ethics in Confucian society today: An empirical case study in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics,89, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P. K. (2009). Is Confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics,88, 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, P. J. (2013). Virtue ethics and the Chinese Confucian tradition. In D. C. Russell (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to virtue ethics (pp. 49–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., & Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals,11(1), 309–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). The theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., & Barclay, L. A. (2017). Affective and normative motives to work overtime in Asian organizations: Four cultural orientations from Confucian Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,140, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., Keaten, J., Finch, C., Duarte, I., Hoffman, P., & Michels, M. (2002). Family communication patterns and the development of reticence. Communication Education,51, 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., Kim, T., & Strudler, A. (2016). Hierarchies and dignity: A Confucian communitarian approach. Business Ethics Quarterly,26(4), 479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (2013). East meets west: Toward a universal ethic of virtue for global business. Journal of Business Ethics,116, 703–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (2016). Non-Western virtue ethics, commerce and the common good. In K. Akrivou & A. J. G. Sison (Eds.), The challenges of capitalism for virtue ethics and the common good (pp. 272–282). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies,48, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. (2010). Virtue ethics and Confucian ethics. Dao,9, 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. (2013). Virtue ethics and Confucian ethics. In S. C. Angle & M. Slote (Eds.), Virtue ethics and Confucianism (pp. 15–27). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (2016). Coasean foundations of a unified theory of Western and Chinese contractual practices and economic organizations. In J. T. Landa (Ed.), Economic Success of Chinese Merchants in Southeast Asia. Identity, ethnic cooperation and conflict (pp. 105–120). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenberg, E. (2013). Chinese Guanxi and business ethics. In Christophe Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (Vol. 3, pp. 955–981). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansberg, I., & Astrachan, J. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review,7, 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. (Ed.). (1984). Mencius. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P.P. (2007). Guanxi as the Chinese norm for personalized social capital: Toward an integrated duality framework of informal exchange. In H. W. C. Yeung (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Asian Business (Vol. 6283).

  • Lin, Y. (2010). The other side of confucius. In Q. Suoqiao (Ed.), Selected bilingual essays of Lin Yutang (pp. 17–23). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. Q. (2010). Confucianism and business practices in China. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. Q., & Stening, B. W. (2016). The contextualization and de-contextualization of Confucian morality: Making Confucianism relevant to China’s contemporary challenges in business ethics. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,33, 821–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, P. K. C., & Ang, S. L. (2013). Confucian ethics, governance and corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business and Management,8(4), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., & Koehn, D. (2015). On responsibility in China: Understanding and practice. Journal of Business Ethics,127, 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage & Family Review,6, 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. E., & Johnson, S. K. (2011). The benefits of a long-lens approach to leader development: Understanding the seeds of leadership. Leadership Quarterly,22, 459–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., & Taylor, A. (1994). Family training for political leadership: Birth order of United States state governors and Australian prime ministers. Political Psychology,15, 435–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (1986). Circumplex model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Family Process,25, 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy,22, 144–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Vl. Theoretical update. Family Process,22, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process,18, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opper, S., Nee, V., & Holm, H. (2017). Risk aversion and Guanxi activities: A behavioral analysis of CEOs in China. Academy of Management Journal,60(4), 1504–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Trapnell, P. D., & Chen, D. (1999). Birth order effects on personality and achievement within families. Psychological Science,10(6), 482–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racko, G. (2019). The values of economics. Journal of Business Ethics,154(1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research,17(4), 523–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R. H. (1964). Toward a theory of family development. Journal of Marriage and the Family,26, 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romar, E. (2002). Virtue is good business: Confucianism as a practical business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,38, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior,65, 498–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2007). Communication processes that mediate family communication patterns and mental well-being: A mean and covariance structures analysis of young adults from divorced and non-divorced families. Human Communication Research,33, 330–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P., Ledbetter, A. M., & Ohrt, J. K. (2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. Journal of Family Communication,7, 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., & Ferrero, I. (2015). How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness? Business Ethics: A European Review,24(S2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B., Lewis, R. A., & Cole, C. L. (1975). Marital adjustment over the family life cycle: The issue of curvilinearity. Journal of Marriage and the Family,37, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K., Duncan, K. A., Danes, S., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review,12, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development,60, 1424–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. H. (2010). Authoritative master Kong (Confucius) in an authoritarian age. Dao, 9(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1993). Problem families and the circumplex model: Observational assessment using the Clinical Rating Scale (CRS). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,19, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L., & Worm, V. (2001). Network capitalism: The role of human resources in penetrating the China market. International Journal of Human Resource Management,12(4), 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, B. W. (2013). Toward a synthesis of Confucianism and Aristotelianism. In S. C. Angle & M. Slote (Eds.), Virtue ethics and Confucianism (pp. 56–65). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The Harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics,88, 433–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W.-Y. (2013). Confucian ethics and virtue ethics revisited. In S. C. Angle & M. Slote (Eds.), Virtue ethics and Confucianism (pp. 74–80). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P. R., & Lamond, D. A. (2011). What would Confucius do?—Confucian ethics and self-regulation in management. Journal of Business Ethics,102, 669–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., de Cremer, D., & Wang, C. (2017). How ethically would Americans and Chinese negotiate? The effect of intra-cultural versus inter-cultural negotiations. Journal of Business Ethics,145, 659–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. (2007). The ethics of Confucius and Aristotle. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. (2013). The practicality of ancient virtue ethics: Greece and China. In S. C. Angle & M. Slote (Eds.), Virtue ethics and Confucianism (pp. 127–140). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work has received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Business, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31009, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

    Alejo José G. Sison, Ignacio Ferrero & Dulce M. Redín

Authors
  1. Alejo José G. Sison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ignacio Ferrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dulce M. Redín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Ferrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

One of the section editor is an author/co-author Editors at the Journal of Business Ethics are recused from all decisions relating to submissions with which there is any identified potential conflict of interest. Submissions to the Journal of Business Ethics from editors of the journal are handled by a senior independent editor at the journal and subject to full double blind peer review processes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sison, A.J.G., Ferrero, I. & Redín, D.M. Some Virtue Ethics Implications from Aristotelian and Confucian Perspectives on Family and Business. J Bus Ethics 165, 241–254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04307-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04307-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation