Advertisement

Removing the Blinders: Increasing Students’ Awareness of Self-Perception Biases and Real-World Ethical Challenges Through an Educational Intervention

  • Kathleen A. TomlinEmail author
  • Matthew L. Metzger
  • Jill Bradley-Geist
Original Paper

Abstract

Business ethics educators strive to produce graduates who not only grasp the principles of ethical decision-making, but who can apply that business ethics education when faced with real-world challenges. However, this has proven especially difficult, as good intentions do not always translate into ethical awareness and action. Complementing a behavioral ethics approach with insights from social psychology, we developed an interventional class module with both online and in-class elements aimed at increasing students’ awareness of their own susceptibility to unconscious biases and, consequently, unethical behaviors. We deployed this intervention within a problem-based learning course (137 undergraduate students), in which students completed real-world projects for actual business clients. Our results suggest that although students appeared universally aware of the importance of ethical issues in business and generally espoused intentions to act ethically, those who received the intervention were significantly more likely to recognize their own susceptibility to perpetuating unethical business behavior and to identify ethical issues specific to their real-world projects. These results have important implications for behavioral ethics pedagogy and provide a de-biasing interventional approach for bridging classroom knowledge with real-world skills.

Keywords

Behavioral ethics Social psychology Psychological traps Bias blind spot Knowing-doing gap Ethics education 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. AACSB. (2017). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB.Google Scholar
  2. Alas, R. (2006). Ethics in countries with different cultural dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcaraz, J. M., & Thiruvattal, E. (2010). An interview with Manuel Escudero: The United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 542–550.Google Scholar
  5. Arce, D. G., & Gentile, M. C. (2015). Giving voice to values as a leverage point in business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argandona, A. (2015). Humility in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong, R. W., Williams, R. J., & Barrett, J. D. (2004). The impact of banality, risky shift and escalating commitment on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(4), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashkanasy, N. M., Windsor, C. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision-making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  11. Bazerman, M. H., & Sezer, O. (2016). Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Behind closed doors: American business and #MeToo. (2018). The Economist, September 27. https://www.economist.com/business/2018/09/27/american-business-and-metoo. Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
  15. Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.Google Scholar
  16. Bernardi, R., Lecca, C. L., Murphy, J. C., & Sturgis, E. M. (2011). Does education influence ethical decisions? An international study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(3), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Billimoria, D. (1998). From classroom learning to real-world learning: A diasporic shift in management education. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brenkert, G. G. (2019). Mind the gap! The challenges and limits of (Global) business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 917–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownell, J., & Jameson, D. A. (2004). Problem-based learning in graduate management education: An integrative model and interdisciplinary application. Journal of Management Education, 28(5), 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang, P., & Wang, D. (2011). Cultivating engineering ethics and critical thinking: A systematic and cross-cultural education approach using problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen, A., Cote, J., & Latham, C. K. (2018). Developing ethical confidence: The impact of action-oriented ethics instruction in an accounting curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3411-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chugh, D., Bazerman, M., & Banaji, M. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. Moore, D. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflict of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Comer, D. R., & Schwartz, M. (2017). Highlighting moral courage in the business ethics course. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(3), 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Comer, D. R., & Vega, G. (2011). Moral courage in organizations: Doing the right thing at work. Armink, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. Dean, K. L., & Beggs, J. M. (2006). University professors and teaching ethics: Conceptualizations and expectations. Journal of Management Education, 30(1), 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drumwright, M., Prentice, R., & Biasucci, C. (2015). Behavioral ethics and teaching ethical decision making. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(3), 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Egan, M. (2017). Wells Fargo uncovers up to 1.4 million more fake accounts. CNN News, August 31. https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/31/investing/wells-fargo-fake-accounts/index.html?iid=EL. Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
  29. Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Ellertson, C. F., Ingerson, M. C., & Williams, R. N. (2016). Behavioral ethics: A critique and a proposal. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fiegerman, S. (2018). Facebook data practices under investigation, FTC confirms. CNN News, March 26. http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/26/technology/facebook-ftc-investigation/index.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
  33. Furman, F. K. (1990). Teaching business ethics: Questioning the assumptions, seeking new directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gates, G., Ewing, J., Russell, K., & Watkins, D. (2017). How Volkswagen’s ‘defeat devices’ worked. The New York Times, March 16. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/international/vw-diesel-emissions-scandal-explained.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
  35. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gentile, M. C. (2010). Giving voice to values: How to speak your mind when you know what’s right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giacalone, R. A., & Thompson, K. R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gottschalk, L. A., & Gleser, G. C. (1969). The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Govekar, M. A., & Rishi, M. (2007). Service learning: Bringing real-world education into the B-school classroom. Journal of Education for Business, 83(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guzak, J. R. (2015). Affect in ethical decision making: Mood matters. Ethics and Behavior, 25(5), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hedberg, P. R. (2017). Guiding moral behavior through a reflective learning practice. Journal of Management Education, 41(4), 514–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hibbert, P., & Cunliffe, A. (2015). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoffmann, M., & Borenstein, J. (2014). Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a collaborative learning and argument visualization approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holland, D., & Albrecht, C. (2013). The worldwide academic field of business ethics: Scholars’ perceptions of the most important issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 777–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoyk, R., & Hersey, P. (2008). The ethical executive. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  49. Huhn, M. P. (2014). You reap what you sow: How MBA programs undermine ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions in the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Wiener (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.Google Scholar
  53. Jones, N. L., Peiffer, A. M., Lambros, A., & Eldridge, J. C. (2010). Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: Process evaluation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(10), 620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  56. Kardas, M., & O’Brien, E. (2018). Easier seen than done: Merely watching others perform can foster an illusion of skill acquisition. Psychological Science, 29(4), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kennedy, E. J., Lawton, L., & Walker, E. (2001). The case for using live cases: Shifting the paradigm in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kennedy, J., & Peecher, M. (1997). Judging auditors’ technical knowledge. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kida, T. (1980). An investigation into auditors’ continuity and related qualification judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 506–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lavine, M. H., & Roussin, C. J. (2012). From idea to action: Promoting responsible management education through a semester-long academic integrity learning project. Journal of Management Education, 36(3), 428–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lawson, R. A. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the” real world”? Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Markowitz, D., Skowronek, S., Stamkou, E., Van Gils, S., & Wang, L. (2018). Organizational deviance: Antecedents and consequences of norm violations and unethicality at work. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 13266). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  64. Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning: Are business schools making the grade? Journal of Education for Business, 82(4), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. May, D. R., Chan, A. Y. L., Hodges, T. D., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Medeiros, K. E., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). What is working, what is not, and what we need to know: A meta-analytic review of business ethics instruction. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mittendorf, B. (2008). Infectious ethics how upright employees can ease concerns of tacit collusion. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 24(2), 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Murcia, M. J., Rocha, H. O., & Birkinshaw, J. (2018). Business schools at the crossroads? A trip back from Sparta to Athens. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nevins, J. L., Bearden, W. O., & Money, B. (2007). Ethical values and long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Brien, K., Wittmer, D., & Ebrahimi, P. (2017). Behavioral ethics in practice: Integrating service learning into a graduate business ethics course. Journal of Management Education, 41(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Offstein, E. H., Dufresne, R. L., & Childers, J. S., Jr. (2017). Novel lessons on behavioral ethics from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Journal of Management Education, 41(4), 480–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peacock, M. (2010). Institutional normativity and the evolution of morals: A behavioural approach to ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  79. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  80. Prentice, R. (2004). Teaching ethics, heuristics, and biases. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 1(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Prentice, R. (2014). Teaching behavioral ethics. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 31(2), 325–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in the self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Raman, G. V., Garg, S., & Thapliya, S. (2017). Integrative live case: A contemporary business ethics pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3514-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  86. Robbins, J. (2012). Defining integrity for individuals and organizations: A cognitive-linguistic modeling approach. In C. Wankel & A. Stachowicz-Stanusch (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching ethics in business and management education (pp. 124–143). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Teaching behavioral ethics: Overcoming the key impediments to ethical behavior. Journal of Management Education, 41(4), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., McCormick, E., Min, H. L., Lebrecht, S., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Bias blind spot: Structure, measurement, and consequences. Management Science, 61(10), 2468–2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sharma, D. (2018). When fairness is not enough: Impact of corporate ethical values on organizational citizenship behaviors and worker alienation. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sigurjonsson, T. O., Arnardottir, A. A., Vaiman, V. V., & Rikhardsson, P. (2015). Managers’ views on ethics education in business schools: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simha, A., Armstrong, J. P., & Albert, J. F. (2012). Attitudes and behaviors of academic dishonesty and cheating—Do ethics education and ethics training affect either attitudes or behaviors? Journal of Business Ethics Education, 9, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sims, R. R., & Felton, E. L. (2006). Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Solberg, J., Strong, K. C., & McGuire, C. (1995). Living (not learning) ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Soltes, E. (2017). Teaching versus living: Managerial decision making in the gray. Journal of Management Education, 41(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stalder, D. R. (2008). A role for social psychology instruction in reducing bias and conflict. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Street, M. D., Robertson, C., & Geiger, S. (1997). Ethical decision making: The effects of escalating commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1153–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Street, M., & Street, V. L. (2006). The effects of escalating commitment on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tomlin, K. A., Metzger, M. L., Bradley-Geist, J., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2017). Are students blind to their ethical blind spots? An exploration of why ethics education should focus on self-perception biases. Journal of Management Education, 41, 539–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  103. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Turner, M. R., McIntosh, T., Reid, S. W., & Buckley, M. R. (2019). Corporate implementation of socially controversial CSR initiatives: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Weldy, T. G., & Turnipseed, D. L. (2010). Assessing and improving learning in business schools: Direct and indirect measures of learning. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen A. Tomlin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew L. Metzger
    • 2
  • Jill Bradley-Geist
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFairfield UniversityFairfieldUSA
  2. 2.College of BusinessUniversity of Colorado Colorado SpringsColorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations