In this article, the co-editors of the Leadership and Ethics: Quantitative Analysis section of the journal outline some of the key issues about conducting quantitative research at the intersection of business, ethics, and leadership. They offer guidance for authors by explaining the types of papers that are often rejected and how to avoid some common pitfalls that lead to rejection. They also offer some ideas for future research by drawing upon the opinions of four noted experts in the field to consider the types of research questions we should be asking, the types of theory we should be building, the types of models we should be testing, and the types of methods we should be using.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
Badaracco, J. L. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right and right. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.
Bidwell, M. J. (2013). What happened to long-term employment? The role of worker power and environmental turbulence in explaining declines in worker tenure. Organization Science, 24, 1061–1082.
Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning theory perspective for construct development. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 160–185.
Candee, D. (1975). The moral psychology of watergate. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 183–192.
Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Ethics and leadership effectiveness. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 302–327). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eckhaus, E. (2017). A shift in leadership. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 16, 19–31.
Edwards, J. R. (2019). The peaceful coexistence of ethics and quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6.
Evans, J. A., & Aceves, P. (2016). Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 21–50.
Folger, R., Ganegoda, D., Rice, D., Taylor, R., & Wo, H. (2013). Bounded autonomy and behavioral ethics: Deonance and reactance as competing motives. Human Relations, 66, 905–924.
Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 461–470.
Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets West: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 813–833.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law (Revised ed.). Fredericksburg, VA: Book Crafters.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Hannah, S., & Avolio, B. J. (2011a). The locus of leader character. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 979–983.
Hannah, S., & Avolio, B. J. (2011b). Leader character, ethos, and virtue: Individual and collective considerations. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 989–994.
Hannah, S. T., Jennings, P. L., Bluhm, D., Peng, A. C., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2014a). Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 220–238.
Hannah, S. T., Sumanth, J. J., Lester, P., & Cavarretta, F. (2014b). Debunking the false dichotomy of leadership idealism and pragmatism: Critical evaluation and support of newer genre leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 598–621.
Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior., 36, S104–S168.
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51–69.
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 148–187.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.
Luthans, F., Hodgetts, R. M., & Rosenkrantz, S. A. (1988). Real managers. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent work: Choice, necessity, and the gig economy. San Francisco, CA: McKinsey Global Institute.
Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 235–289.
Moore, C., Mayer, D. M., Chiang, F. F. T., Crossley, C., Karlesky, M. J., & Birtch, T. A. (2019). Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 123–145.
Mumford, M. D., & Fried, Y. (2014). Give them what they want or give them what they need? Ideology in the study of leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 622–634.
Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337–360.
Rajan, R. G., & Wulf, J. (2006). The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 759–773.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.
Schaubroeck, J., Hannah, S., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W., Lord, R. L., Trevino, L. K., et al. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1053–1078.
Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.
Sumanth, J. J., & Hannah, S. T. (2014). Developing leadership capacity: An integration and exploration of ethical and authentic leadership antecedents. In C. A. Screischeim & L. L. Neider (Eds.), Research in management (Vol. 10, pp. 25–74). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.
Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 117–131.
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Hannah, S. T., & Balthazard, P. B. (2017). A neurological and ideological perspective of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1285–1306.
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. B., & Owens, B. (2018). Psychological and neurological predictors of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 71, 399–421.
Walker, L., & Henning, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 629–647.
Zyphur, M., & Pierides, D. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16.
Conflict of interest
All authors have certified that they have no conflicts of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Palanski, M., Newman, A., Leroy, H. et al. Quantitative Research on Leadership and Business Ethics: Examining the State of the Field and an Agenda for Future Research. J Bus Ethics 168, 109–119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04267-9
- Ethical leadership