(Self-)Regulation of Sharing Economy Platforms Through Partial Meta-organizing
- 303 Downloads
Can platforms close the governance gap in the sharing economy, and if so, how? Through an in-depth qualitative case study, we analyze the process by which new regulation and self-regulation emerge in one sector of the sharing economy, crowdfunding, through the actions of a meta-organization. We focus on the principal French sectoral meta-organization, Financement Participatif France (FPF—Crowdfunding France). We show that this multi-stakeholder meta-organization not only closed the governance gap through collective legal, ethical, and utilitarian work but also preceded and shaped the new market. We present a hybrid governance approach combining (a) soft multi-agency regulation, (b) self-regulation through a process of “partial meta-organizing”, and (c) direct civil society participation. We expand the literature by highlighting features of platforms’ partial meta-organizing and by identifying conditions for successful joint regulation and self-regulation of the sector.
KeywordsSharing economy Crowdfunding Self-regulation Meta-organization Partial organization Governance
We are grateful for guest editors and anonymous reviewers’ help, as well as for comments on previous versions of this article from: Pr. Véronique Bessière, Pr. Florence Charue-Duboc, Pr. Mathias Guérineau, Pr. Christophe Moussu, Pr. Mar Perezts, participants of the Sharing Economy PDW at EGOS 2017, AIMS 2018 reviewers and participants, Labex Refi, IBEI NRI and Globalization research clusters. We also would like to thank FPF and FPF members for welcoming our research project.
This study was funded by laboratory of excellence ReFi, of heSam University (Grant No. ANR-10-LABX-0095) and by Agence nationale de la Recherche (Grant No. ANR-11-IDEX-0006-02).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this paper.
- Brescia, R. H. (2016). Regulating the sharing economy: New and old insights into an oversight regime for the peer-to-peer economy. Nebraska Law Review, 95(1), 87–145.Google Scholar
- Brunsson, N., Gustafsson, I., & Hallström, K. T. (2018). Markets, trust, and the construction of macro-organizations. In N. Brunsson & M. Jutterström (Eds.), Organizing and reorganizing markets (pp. 136–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cannon, S., & Summers, L. H. (2014). How Uber and the sharing economy can win over regulators. Harvard Business Review, 13(10), 24–28.Google Scholar
- Chaffee, E. C., & Rapp, G. C. (2012). Regulating online peer-to-peer lending in the aftermath of Dodd-Frank: In search of an evolving regulatory regime for an evolving industry. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 69(2), 485–533.Google Scholar
- Christiansen, L. H., & Kroezen, J. J. (2016). Institutional maintenance through business collective action: The alcohol industry’s engagement with the issue of alcohol-related harm. In How Institutions Matter! (pp. 101–143). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M., & Sundararajan, A. (2015). Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue, 82(1), 116–133.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Dumez, H. (2016). Comprehensive Research. A methodological and epistemological introduction to qualitative research. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Fraiberger, S. P., & Sundararajan, A. (2017). Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. NYU Stern School of Business Research Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2574337.
- Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The diffusion of regulatory capitalism in latin America: Sectoral and national channels in the making of a new order. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.Google Scholar
- King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Barnett, M. L. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 393–406). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar
- Philippon, T. (2016). The FinTech Opportunity (Working Paper No. 22476). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22476
- Rauch, D. E., & Schleicher, D. (2015). Like Uber, but for local government law: The future of local regulation of the sharing economy. Ohio St. LJ, 76(4), 901–963.Google Scholar
- Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
- Souchaud, A. (2017). Deus ex machina dans « l’espace régulatoire » du crédit en France: La reconnaissance du crowdlending face au monopole bancaire. Gérer et Comprendre. Annales Des Mines, 128, 3–13.Google Scholar
- Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zrenner, A. (2015). The Ethics of Regulating the Sharing Economy. Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University, Durham, NC. CEPS▪ Place Du Congrès, 1.Google Scholar