Abstract
In the absence of effective judicial remediation mechanisms after business-related human rights violations, companies themselves are expected to establish remediation procedures for affected victims and communities. This is a challenge for both companies and victims since comprehensive company-based grievance mechanisms (CGM) are currently missing. In this paper, we explore how companies can provide effective remediation after human rights violations. Accordingly, we critically assess two different approaches to conflict resolution, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and restorative justice (RJ), for their potential to provide dialogue-based, non-judicial remediation. We argue that remedy through agreement-driven ADR mechanisms risks marginalizing the interests and concerns of victims and affected community members, particularly in weak institutional contexts. Hence, we develop a dialogue-driven framework for corporate remediation of human rights violations grounded on RJ principles. This restorative framework provides a comprehensive CGM that focuses on the harms and needs of victims and aims at restoring justice through restorative dialogue. Based on a prompt discovery and a thorough investigation of the grievance, companies should design and prepare the remediation process together with victims, offenders and affected community members. Through restorative dialogue with the affected parties about the circumstances and impacts of the wrongdoing, companies can repair the harm, regain legitimacy amongst stakeholders as well as transform their business practices to avoid future human rights violations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, D. G. (2010). Transnational corporations and the duty to respect basic human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 371–399. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020327.
Balaton-Chrimes, S., & Haines, F. (2015). The depoliticisation of accountability processes for land-based grievances, and the IFC CAO. Global Policy, 6, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12275.
Balaton-Chrimes, S., & MacDonald, K. (2016). Wilmar and palm oil grievances: The promise and pitfalls of problem solving. Corporate Accountability Research. Retrieved from http://corporateaccountabilityresearch.net/s/NJM08_wilmar-tx4y.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Balaton-Chrimes, S., & Haines, F. (2017). Redress and corporate human rights harms: An analysis of new governance and the POSCO Odisha project. Globalizations, 14, 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1223958.
Baumann-Pauly, D., & Nolan, J. (Eds.). (2016). Business and human rights: From principles to practice. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Baumann-Pauly, D., Nolan, J., van Heerden, A., & Samway, M. (2017). Industry-specific multi-stakeholder initiatives that govern corporate human rights standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3076-z.
Berger, K. P. (2009). Private dispute resolution in international business: Negotiation, mediation, arbitration (2nd edn.). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Bertels, S., Cody, M., & Pek, S. (2014). A responsive approach to organizational misconduct: Rehabilitation, reintegration, and the reduction of reoffense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 343–370. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20147212.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Calderón-Meza, P. (2016). Arbitration for human rights: Seeking civil redress for corporate atrocity crimes. Harvard International Law Journal, Retrieved from http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/Calderon-Meza_0615.pdf. February 26, 2019.
CAO. (2017). Purpose, design & implementation: The purpose and goals of this toolkit. Compliance Advisor Ombudsman. Retrieved from https://www.cao-grm.org/purpose-design-and-implementation#section-4. February 11, 2017.
Centre for Justice & Reconciliation. (2017). Lesson 1: What is restorative justice: Amends. Retrieved from http://restorativejustice.org/restorative-justice/about-restorative-justice/tutorial-intro-to-restorative-justice/lesson-1-what-is-restorative-justice/amends/. January 31, 2017.
Cormier, R. B. (2002). Restorative justice: Directions and principles – Developments in Canada. Department of the Solicitor General Canada. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/JS42-107-2002E.pdf. February 26, 2019.
Cragg, W. (2012). Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights: A critical look at the justificatory foundations of the UN framework. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122213.
Cragg, W., Arnold, D. G., & Muchlinski, P. (2012). Guest editors’ introduction: Human rights and business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122212.
Davis, R., & Franks, D. M. (2011). The costs of conflict with local communities in the extractive industry. Retrieved from https://commdev.org/userfiles/Davis%20&%20Franks_Costs%20of%20Conflict_SRM.pdf. March 3, 2019.
Evan, B., & Sands, K. (2014). CARe processes and the pilot experience. Retrieved from http://www.macrmi.info/files/9314/0207/3052/Forum_2014_-CARe_Processes_and_the_Pilot_Experience.pdf. May 26, 2017.
Fasterling, B., & Demuijnck, G. (2013). Human rights in the void?: Due diligence in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1822-z.
Gade, C. B. N. (2013). Restorative justice and the South African truth and reconciliation process. South African Journal of Philosophy, 32, 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2013.810412.
Gillespie, N., Dietz, G., & Lockey, S. (2014). Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: A case study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 371–410. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014437.
Goltsman, M., Hörner, J., Pavlov, G., & Squintani, F. (2009). Mediation, arbitration and negotiation. Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 1397–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2008.08.010.
Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. (2010). And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.632.
Goodstein, J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2010). Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 453–480. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020330.
Goodstein, J., Butterfield, K. D., Pfarrer, M. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2014). Individual and organizational reintegration after ethical or legal transgressions: Challenges and opportunities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 315–342. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201471716.
Human Rights Clinics. (2015). Righting wrongs?: Barrick Gold’s remedy mechanism for sexual violence in Papua New Guinea: Key concerns and lessons learned. Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic & Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic. Retrieved from http://hrp.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/FINALBARRICK.pdf. February 21, 2018.
Johnstone, G., & van Ness, D. W. (2011). The meaning of restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 5–23). London: Routledge.
Kaner, S., Toldi, C., Berger, D., Lind, L., & Fisk, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass a Wiley Brand.
Keeton, R. B. (2015). Crime victims and offenders face to face: An overview of the Texas department of criminal justice victim offender mediation/dialogue program. Resolved: Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 5, 26.
Kidder, D. L. (2007). Restorative justice: not “rights”, but the right way to heal relationships at work. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060710759291.
Knuckey, S., & Jenkin, E. (2015). Company-created remedy mechanisms for serious human rights abuses: A promising new frontier for the right to remedy? The International Journal of Human Rights, 19, 801–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1048645.
Kolstad, I. (2012). Human rights and positive corporate duties: The importance of corporate-state interaction. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2012.01654.x.
Lampe, M. (2001). Mediation as an ethical adjunct of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010749313936.
Larson Sawin, J., & Zehr, H. (2011). The ideas of engagement and empowerment. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 41–58). London: Routledge.
Llewellyn, J. J., & Howse, R. (1999). Institutions for restorative justice: The South African truth and reconciliation commission. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 49, 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/826003.
MACRMI. (2013). Sample CARe procedure: Communication, apology and resolution (CARe) procedure for determination and use. Massachusetts Alliance for Communication and Resolution following Medical Injury. Retrieved from http://www.macrmi.info/files/4113/8359/5740/Sample_CARe_Procedure.pdf. March 4, 2019.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458.
McPhail, K., & Ferguson, J. (2016). The past, the present and the future of accounting for human rights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29, 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2441.
Mena, S., de Leede, M., Baumann, D., Black, N., Lindeman, S., & McShane, L. (2010). Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0188-8.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2007). Restorative justice: What is it and does it work? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 161–187.
Michalowski, S. (Ed.). (2013). Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Abingdon: Routledge.
MiningWatch Canada. (2018). Inequality of Arms: A summary of concerns raised by victims of violence by private and public mine security at Barrick Gold’s North Mara Gold Mine in Tanzania regarding the mine’s new Operation-level Grievance Mechanism. Retrieved from https://miningwatch.ca/publications/2018/9/4/inequality-arms-summary-concerns-raised-victims-violence-private-and-public. November 18, 2018.
Muchlinski, P. (2012). Implementing the new UN corporate human rights framework: Implications for corporate law, governance, and regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 145–177. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122218.
Murphy, M., & Vives, J. (2013). Perceptions of justice and the human rights protect, respect, and remedy framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 781–797.
Napley, K. (2014). A global trend towards mediation: views from lawyers in 13 countries. Retrieved from http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=141327c6-452b-4f69-a6b1-a834c0453c90. March 14, 2017.
OECD Watch. (2015). Remedy remains rare: An analysis of 15 years of NCP cases and their contribution to improve access to remedy for victims of corporate misconduct. Retrieved from https://www.oecdwatch.org/publications-en/Publication_4201/@@download/fullfile/Remedy%20Remains%20Rare.pdf. February 21, 2018.
OHCHR. (2018). Phase III: Enhancing the effectiveness of non-state-based grievance mechanisms: Scope and programme of work. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/ARP/ARPIII-PoW.pdf. March 3, 2019.
OHCHR. (2019). OHCHR Accountability and remedy project: improving accountability and access to remedy in cases of business involvement in human rights abuses. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/OHCHRaccountabilityandremedyproject.aspx. February 26, 2019.
Pariotti, E. (2009). International soft law, human rights and non-state actors: Towards the accountability of transnational corporations? Human Rights Review, 10, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-008-0104-0.
Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730–749. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465757.
Radzik, L. (2011). Offenders, the making of amends and the state. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 192–207). London: Routledge.
Raye, B. E., & Warner Roberts, A. (2011). Restorative processes. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice. London: Routledge.
Rees, C. (2010). Mediation in business-related human rights disputes: Objections, opportunities and challenges: Working Paper No. 56. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University. Retrieved from http://accessfacility.org/sites/default/files/Rees%20-%20Mediation%20in%20Business-Related%20Human%20Rights%20Disputes.pdf. February 26, 2019.
Rees, C., & Davis, R. (2016). Where we’re at: Taking stock of progress on business and human rights. Shift. Retrieved from http://www.shiftproject.org/resources/viewpoints/taking-stock-progress-guiding-principles/. January 14, 2017.
Roche, D. (2003). Accountability in restorative justice (Clarendon studies in criminology). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roche, D. (2006). Dimensions of restorative justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00448.x.
Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Schiff, M. (2011). Satisfying the needs and interests of stakeholders. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 228–246). London: Routledge.
Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Wettstein, F. (2017). Beyond guilty verdicts: Human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2889-5.
Sherman, J. (2009). Embedding rights compatible grievance processes for external stakeholders within business culture: Report No. 36. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.socialimpactassessment.com/documents/report_36_sherman_grievance.pdf. February 26, 2019.
Skinner, G., McCorquodale, R., & de Schutter, O. (2013). The third pillar: Access to judicial remedies for human rights violations by transnational business. Retrieved from http://corporatejustice.org/documents/publications/eccj/the_third_pillar_-access_to_judicial_remedies_for_human_rights_violation.-1-2.pdf. March 3, 2019.
The Risk Authority Stanford. (2015). The promise of risk management: The Risk Authority Stanford’s duty to lead, vow to protect, and future to deliver. Retrieved from http://2lqlcl3xk1mm2ddadq3qg9bx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/TRA%E2%80%93Promise-of-risk-management.pdf. February 26, 2019.
Thompson, B. (2017). Determining criteria to evaluate outcomes of businesses’ provision of remedy: Applying a human rights-based approach. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2, 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.30.
Umbreit, M. S., & Lewis, T. (2015). Dialogue-driven victim offender mediation training manual: A composite collection of training resource materials. Retrieved from https://nicic.gov/dialogue-driven-victim-offender-mediation-training-manual-composite-collection-training-resource. July 26, 2018.
UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. (2016). UNEP FI takeaways. Retrieved from http://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/UNEP-FI-Takeaways-from-the-UN-Business-and-Human-Rights-Forum-2016.pdf. March 14, 2017.
UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. (2017). Realizing access to effective remedy. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Forum/Pages/2017ForumBHR.aspx. February 21, 2018.
UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework. (2018). Database & analysis of company reporting. Retrieved from https://www.ungpreporting.org/database-analysis/. February 26, 2018.
United Nations. (2008a). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. A/HRC/8/5. Retrieved from https://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/9759994.14920807.html. February 26, 2019.
United Nations. (2008b). Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises: Addendum - Corporations and human rights: a survey of the scope and patterns of alleged corporate-related human rights abuse. A/HRC/8/5/Add.2. Retrieved from https://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/6660941.24317169.html. February 26, 2019.
United Nations. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the Unites Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework. HR/PUB/11/04. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. February 26, 2019.
United Nations. (2012). The corporate responsibility to respect human rights: An interpretive guide. HR/PUB/12/02. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR.PUB.12.2_En.pdf. February 26, 2019.
van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2014). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice (5th edn.). Waltham.: Anderson Publishing.
Weitekamp, E., Parmentier, S., Vanspauwen, K., Valiñas, M., & Gerits, R. (2006). How to deal with mass victimization and gross human rights violations. A restorative justice approach. NATO Security through Science Series—E: Human and Societal Dynamics. 13, 217–241.
Wettstein, F. (2012). Silence as complicity: Elements of a corporate duty to speak out against the violation of human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 37–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122214.
Wettstein, F. (2015). Normativity, ethics, and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: A critical assessment. Journal of Human Rights, 14, 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1005733.
Wilson, E., & Blackmore, E. (2013). Dispute or dialogue?: Community perspectives on company-led grievance mechanisms. International Institute for Environment and Development (UK). Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16529IIED.pdf. February 26, 2019.
Zagelmeyer, S., Bianchi, L., & Shemberg, A. R. (2018). Non-state based non-judicial grievance mechanisms (NSBGM): An exploratory analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/ARP/ManchesterStudy.pdf. March 3, 2019.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottdale: Herald Press.
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse: Good Books.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the associate editor as well as two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. In addition, we thank the participants of the Society for Business Ethics Annual Conference in Chicago where an earlier version of this paper was presented in 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schormair, M.J.L., Gerlach, L.M. Corporate Remediation of Human Rights Violations: A Restorative Justice Framework. J Bus Ethics 167, 475–493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04147-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04147-2