Managing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability Through a Practical Wisdom Lens
Previous research has underlined the significance of practical wisdom pertaining to corporate sustainability (CS). Recent studies, however, have identified managing opposing but interlocked tensions related to environmental, social, and economic aspects as one of the most crucial future challenges in CS. Therefore, we apply the established link between wisdom and sustainability to the pressing topic of managing tensions in CS. We commence with a literature overview of tensions in sustainability management, which manifests our basic work assumption concerning the need for practical wisdom in CS. We then discuss the threefold, mutual interconnectedness between practical wisdom and tension management in CS, which we illustrate in a conceptual model. Thereafter, we develop a set of propositions on how a practical wisdom approach influences CS in practice and how it differs from a business-case approach. In recognition of the conceptual character of our paper, we conclude by outlining potential practical applications and theoretical implications of the model and of the propositions. Limitations and avenues for further research are discussed.
KeywordsCorporate sustainability Tension management Practical wisdom Sustainable management Business ethics Prudence
We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their very useful suggestions on a previous draft. We greatly appreciate the comments received.
The authors confirm that no funding was received for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Accenture. (2016). The UN global compact-Accenture strategy CEO Study 2016. http://www.unglobalcompact.org. Accessed 9 Oct 2017.
- Angus-Leppan, T., Benn, S., & Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy & the Environment, 19(4), 230–244.Google Scholar
- Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Barnett, M. L. (2016). The business case for corporate social responsibility. A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society. First Published Online 26 Jul 2016.Google Scholar
- Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E., Dunham, L., & Vea, J. M. (2007). Strategic ethics—strategy, wisdom and stakeholder theory: A pragmatic and entrepreneurial view of stakeholder strategy (Trans.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Habisch, A., & Bachmann, C. (2016). Empowering practical wisdom from religious traditions: A Ricoeurian approach. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(10), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Kaipa, P., & Radjou, N. (2013). From smart to wise: Acting and leading with wisdom (Trans.). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Khalili, N. (2011). Practical sustainability: From grounded theory to emerging strategies (Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
- Rhonheimer, M. (1994). Praktische Vernunft Und Vernünftigkeit Der Praxis. Handlungstheorie Bei Thomas Von Aquin in Ihrer Entstehung Aus Dem Problemkontext Der Aristotelischen Ethik (Trans.). Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
- Sasse, L. (2016). The practical wisdom behind the global reporting initiative. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. 3rd International Conference CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance Sustainable Management as a New Business Paradigm. Cologne.Google Scholar
- Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.Google Scholar
- Skroupa, C. P. (2016). Societal needs-the responsibility of government or company? Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherskroupa/2016/05/18/meeting-the-needs-of-society-whose-job-is-it-corporations-or-government/#1e45c0696de8. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
- Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
- Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate sustainability: What is it and where does it come from? Ivey Business Journal, 67(6), 1–5.Google Scholar