Beyond different starting points, stakeholder theory (ST) and Catholic Social Thought (CST) share many compatible perspectives when analyzing the role of the firm in economic activity, especially regarding the attention of the firm to different social and economic actors. Additionally, ST bears limitations regarding its ethical and anthropological foundation, and also about the legitimation of the different stakeholders’ interests. Therefore, ST lacks clear criteria to solve possible conflicts of interest between stakeholders. This paper analyzes the potentiality of ST, widely accepted in corporate management, to integrate CST principles in order to solve those conflicts. At the same time, the paper studies the possibility of finding in the principles of CST an anthropological and ethical foundation for ST. This foundation could be the source of criteria to discuss the levels of legitimation and prioritization between stakeholders´ interests, especially when those interests collide.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Compendium of the social doctrine of the Church
Catholic social thought
Caritas in veritate
Gaudium et spes
Mater et magistra
Pontifical council for justice and peace
Pacem in terris
Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(02), 153–190.
Aguado, R., Alcaniz, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2015). A new role for the firm incorporating sustainability and human dignity. Conceptualization and measurement. Human Systems Management, 34(1), 43–56.
Aguado, R., Retolaza, J. L., & Alcañiz, L. (2017). Dignity at the level of the firm: beyond the stakeholder approach. In M. Kostera & M. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and the Organization (pp. 81–98). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Alford, H. (2006). Stakeholder theory. The good company: Catholic social thought and corporate social responsibility in dialogue. Pontifical University of St Thomas, Rome. Plenary Session, Saturday October 7. Retrieved February 21, 2018 from http://www.oikonomia.it/images/immagini_X_Articoli/2007/2007_giugno/pdf/05_studi_Helen%20alford.pdf.
Alford, H. (2010). The personal wisdom of personalism. Journal of management development, 29(8), 697–705.
Alford, H. (2012). Ethical foundations of corporate social responsibility. The contribution of Christian social thought. In G. Zanda (Ed.), Corporate Management in a Knowledge-based Economy (pp. 189–211). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alford, H. (2013). The influence of thomistic thought in contemporary business ethics. In C. Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 227–250). Netherlands: Springer.
Alford, H., Sena, B., & Shcherbinina, Y. (2006). Philosophical underpinnings and basic concepts for a dialogue between CST and CSR on the “Good Company”, Position paper for the Angelicum Conference, October. Retrieved February 21, 2018 from https://www.stthomas.edu/media/catholicstudies/center/ryan/conferences/2006-rome/00POSITION.Paper.Fou.pdf.
Argandona, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of business ethics, 17(9), 1093–1102.
Argandona, A. (2015). Why is a Catholic manager different? In D. Melé & M. Schlag (Eds.), Humanism in economics and business. Perspectives of the Catholic social tradition (pp. 201–214). New York: Springer.
Baviera, T., English, W., & Guillén, M. (2016). The logic of the gift: Inspiring behaviour in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 159–180.
Becchetti, L., & Cermelli, M. (2014). Reduccionismos económicos y “voto con la cartera”. Revista de Fomento Social, 69, 121–135.
Benedict, X. V. I. (2009). Caritas in veritate. Retrieved June 12. 2015 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
Bruni, L., & Uelmen, A. J. (2006). Religious values and corporate decision making: The economy of communion project. Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L., 11, 645–680.
Byron, W. (1998). Ten building blocks of Catholic social teaching. America, 31(Oct.), 9–12.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, 20(1), 92–117.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
Dierksmeier, C. (2016). Reframing economic ethics: The philosophical foundations of humanistic management. Netherlands: Palgrave macmillan.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The academy of management review, 19(2), 252–284.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Durham, L., Freeman, E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularised exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.
Evan, W., & Freeman, E. (1988). Ethical theory and business. Englewood cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Francis, I. (2013). Evangelii Gaudium, w2. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/ apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html.
Francis, I. (2015). Laudato Si. Retrieved November 12, 2015 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
Freeman, E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.
Freeman, E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(01), 169–180.
Freeman, E. (2008). Ending the so-called ‘Friedman-Freeman’ debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.
Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of business ethics, 96(1), 7–9.
Freeman, E. (2012). Bowie’s ethics: A pragmatist perspective. In D. G. Arnold & J. D. Harris (Eds.), Kantian business ethics: Critical perspectives (pp. 35–47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Freeman, E., & Auster, E. R. (2015). Bridging the Values Gap: How Authentic Organizations Bring Values to Life. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Freeman, E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1988). Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Freeman, E., & Ginena, K. (2015). Rethinking the purpose of the corporation. Notizie di Politeia, 31(117), 9–18.
Freeman, E., & Liedtka, J. (1991). Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons, 34(4), 92–99.
Freeman, E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286–296.
Freeman, E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 303–314.
Freeman, E., Stewart, L., & Moriarty, B. (2009). Teaching business ethics in the age of Madoff. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(6), 37–42.
Freeman, E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. With the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business ethics quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
John, X. X. I. I. I. (1961). Mater et Magistra. https://www.papalencyclicals.net. Accessed 15 September 2015.
John, X. X. I. I. I. (1963). Pacem in terris. Retrieved March 22, 2017 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
John Paul, I. I. (1991). Centesimus annus. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
Kostera, M., & Pirson, M. (2017). Dignity and the Organization. Humanism in Business Series. London: Palgrave macmillan.
Leo, X. I. I. I. (1891). Rerum Novarum. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
Lepeley, M.-T., von Kimakowitz, E., & Bardy, R. (2016). Human centered management in executive education. Global imperatives, innovation and new directions. Houndmills: Palgrave macmillan.
Mathur, V. N., Price, A. D., & Austin, S. (2008). Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 601–609.
McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.
Melé, D. (2009a). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.
Melé, D. (2009b). The view and purpose of the firm in Freeman’s stakeholder theory. Philosophy of Management, 8(3), 3–13.
Melé, D. (2010a). The practice of networking: An ethical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 487–503.
Melé, D. (2010b). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 637–645.
Melé, D. (2012a). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.
Melé, D. (2012b). Foundations for business ethics: Exploring caritas in veritate. In D. Melé & C. Dierksmeier (Eds.), Human development in business. Values and humanistic management in the encyclical Caritas in Veritate (pp. 63–84). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Melé, D., & Gonzalez-Canton, C. (2014). Human Foundations of Management: Understanding the Homo Humanus, (IESE Business Collection). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Melé, D., & Schlag, M. (Eds.). (2015). Humanism in economics and business. perspectives of the catholic social tradition. New York: Springer.
Naughton, M. (2015). Thinking institutionally about business: Seeing its nature as a community of persons and its purpose as the common good. In D. Melé & M. Schlag (Eds.), Humanism in economics and business. Perspectives of the Catholic social tradition (pp. 179–199). New York: Springer.
Parmar, B., Freeman, E., Harrison, J.: Wicks, A., Purnell, L., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.
Paul, V. I. (1967): Populorum Progressio. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from https://www.papalencyclicals.net.
Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, E. (2010). Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Cittá del Vaticano. Retrieved April 2, 2017 from https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html.
Retolaza, J. L., San-José, L., & Aguado, R. (2016). The role of shapeholders as a link between a firm and non-stakeholders: the pursuit of an economy for the common good based on stakeholder theory. In D. Crowther & S. Shahla (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and stakeholding (pp. 31–48). Bringley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
San-José, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Freeman, E. (2017). Stakeholder engagement at etxanobe: A case study of the new story of business. In E. Freeman, J. Kujala & S. Sachs (Eds.), Stakeholder engagement: Clinical research cases. New York: Springer.
Santacoloma, J. F., & Aguado, R. (Eds.). (2011). Economía y Humanismo Cristiano: Una visión alternativa de la actividad económica. Bilbao: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto.
Sison, A. J., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The Common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic Tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.
Solomon, R. C. (1994). The corporation as community: A reply to Ed Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(3), 271–285.
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.
Strand, R., & Freeman, E. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of business ethics, 127(1), 65–85.
Vatican Council, I. I. (1965). Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from https://www.vatican.va/content/vatican/en.html.
Waddock, S. A. (2014). Intellectual Shamans: Management academics making a difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.
Wojtyla, K. (1979). The person: Subject and community. The Review of Metaphysics, 33(2), 273–308.
Wojtyla, K. (1993). Person and community. Selected Essays. New York: Perter Lang.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. No humans were involved so no informed consent was needed.
About this article
Cite this article
Retolaza, J.L., Aguado, R. & Alcaniz, L. Stakeholder Theory Through the Lenses of Catholic Social Thought. J Bus Ethics 157, 969–980 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3963-6
- Stakeholder theory
- Catholic Social Thought
- Theory of the firm
- Purpose of the firm