Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 160, Issue 1, pp 277–292 | Cite as

Money and the Commons: An Investigation of Complementary Currencies and Their Ethical Implications

  • Camille MeyerEmail author
  • Marek Hudon
Original Paper

Abstract

The commons is a concept increasingly used with the promise of creating new collective wealth. In the aftermath of the economic and financial crises, finance and money have been criticized and redesigned to serve the collective interest. In this article, we analyze three types of complementary currency (CC) systems: community currencies, inter-enterprise currencies, and cryptocurrencies. We investigate whether these systems can be considered as commons. To address this question, we use two main theoretical frameworks that are usually separate: the “new commons” in organization studies and the “common good” in business ethics. Our findings show that these monetary systems and organizations may be considered as commons under the “common good” framework since they promote the common interest by creating new communities. Nevertheless, according to the “new commons” framework, only systems relying on collective action and self-management can be said to form commons. This allows us to suggest two new categories of commons: the “social commons,” which fit into both the “new commons” and the “common good” frameworks, and the “commercial commons,” which fit the “common good” but not the “new commons” framework. This research advances a new conceptualization of the commons and of the ethical implications of CCs.

Keywords

Common good Commons Complementary currencies Community currencies Cryptocurrencies Ethics in finance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ester Barinaga, Tina Dacin, Tom Dedeurwaerere, Sandrine Frémeaux, Georgina Gomez, Helen Haugh, Marc Labie, Frédéric Louault, Hugues Pirotte, Jean-Michel Servet, Alejo Sison, Ariane Szafarz, Annabel Vanroose and Monika Winn for the comments they provided for improving this article. Some funding for the article preparation was provided by the Centre for Social and Sustainable Innovation under a donation from Goldcorp Inc.

References

  1. Aglietta, M., & Orléan, A. (1998). La Monnaie Souveraine. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  2. Akrivou, K., & Sison, A. J. G. (Eds.). (2016). The challenges of capitalism for virtue ethics and the common good: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Angel, J., & Mc Cabe, D. (2015). The ethics of payments: Paper, plastic, or Bitcoin? Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 603–611.Google Scholar
  4. Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040.Google Scholar
  5. Argandoña, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9–10), 1093–1102.Google Scholar
  6. Arjaliès, D. L. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
  7. Baeck, C., & Elbeck, M. (2015). Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look. Applied Economics Letters, 22, 30–34.Google Scholar
  8. Barinaga, E. (forthcoming). Land, labour, money: solidarity and inequality in a community currency. International Journal of Community Currencies Research.Google Scholar
  9. Blanc, J. (2011). Classifying ‘CCs’: Community, complementary and local currencies. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 15(D), 4–10.Google Scholar
  10. Blanc, J. (2017). Making sense of the plurality of money: A Polanyian attempt. In Presented at 29th SASE annual meeting, Lyon, France, June 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Blanc, J., & Fare, M. (2016). Turning values concrete: The role and ways of business selection in local currency schemes. Review of Social Economy, 74(3), 298–319.Google Scholar
  12. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2012). The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brière, M., Oosterlinck, K., & Szafarz, A. (2015). Virtual currency, tangible return: Portfolio diversification with Bitcoin. Journal of Asset Management, 16(6), 365–373.Google Scholar
  14. Casey, M. J., & Vigna, P. (2018). In blockchain we trust. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved April 15, 2018, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610781/in-blockchain-we-trust/.
  15. Chuen, D. (2015). The handbook of digital currency. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Coriat, B. (2015). Le Retour des Communs. La Crise de l’Idéologie Propriétaire. Paris: Les Liens qui Libèrent.Google Scholar
  17. Cornée, S., & Szafarz, A. (2014). Vive la Différence: Social banks and reciprocity in the credit market. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 361–380.Google Scholar
  18. Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2011). Ecological economics: Principles and applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun: Essai sur la Révolution au XXIe Siècle. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  20. De Angelis, M. (2007). The beginning of history: Value struggles and global capital. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  21. De Filippi, P. (2015). Translating commons-based peer production into metrics: Towards commons-based crypto-currencies. In D. Lee & K. Chuen (Ed.), The handbook of digital currency. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. De Filippi, P., & Loveluck, B. (2016). The invisible politics of Bitcoin: Governance crisis of a decentralised infrastructure. Internet Policy Review.  https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.3.427.
  23. De Moor, T. (2011). From common pastures to global commons: A historical perspective on interdisciplinary approaches to commons. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19(4), 422–431.Google Scholar
  24. Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2009). Social learning as a basis for cooperative small-scale forest management. Small-Scale Forestry, 8(2), 193–209.Google Scholar
  25. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.Google Scholar
  26. Dierksmeier, C., & Celano, A. (2012). Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.Google Scholar
  27. Dierksmeier, C., & Seele, P. (2016). Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3298-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dissaux, T. (2016). Making money a common resource: The case of the “Bangla-Pesa” Community currency in Kenya. In Presented at the twelfth “AFD International Conference on Development: Commons and Development”, Paris, France, December 1–2, 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Dodd, N. (2015). The social life of money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
  31. Dupré, D., Ponsot, J. F., & Servet, J. M. (2015). Le bitcoin contre la révolution des communs. In Presented at the fifth ‘Congrès de l’Association Française d’Economie Politique (AFEP)’, Lyon, France, July 2015.Google Scholar
  32. Evans-Pughe, C., Novikov, A., & Vitaliev, V. (2014). To bit or not to bit? [Bitcoin cryptocurrency]. Engineering and Technology, 9(4), 82–85.Google Scholar
  33. Fare, M., de Freitas, C., & Meyer, C. (2015). Territorial development and community currencies: Symbolic meanings in Brazilian community development banks. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 19(D), 6–17.Google Scholar
  34. Fare, M., & Ould Ahmed, P. (2017). Complementary currency systems and their ability to support economic and social changes. Development and Change, 48(5), 847–872.Google Scholar
  35. Fournier, V. (2013). Commoning: On the social organisation of the commons. M@n@gement, 16(4), 433–453.Google Scholar
  36. França Filho, G., Silva Junior, J., & Scalfoni, A. (2012). Solidarity finance through community development banks as a strategy for reshaping local economies: Lessons from Banco Palmas. Revista de Administração da Universidade de São Paulo, 47(3), 500–515.Google Scholar
  37. Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2017). The common good of the firm and humanistic management: Conscious capitalism and economy of communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(4), 701–709.Google Scholar
  38. Gomez, G. M., & Helmsing, A. H. J. (2008). Selective spatial closure and local economic development: What do we learn from the Argentine local currency systems? World Development, 36(11), 2489–2511.Google Scholar
  39. Gomez, G. M., & Wit, J. D. (2015). Contestations and Contradictions in the Argentine Redes de Trueque. Revue de la Régulation. Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://regulation.revues.org/11565.
  40. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  41. Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658.Google Scholar
  42. Helfrich, S. (2012). Common goods don’t simply exist—They are created. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state (pp. 61–67). Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hess, C. (2008). Mapping new commons. In Presented at the twelfth biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Cheltenham, UK, July 14–18, 2008.Google Scholar
  44. Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hudon, M., & Meyer, C. (2016). A case study of microfinance and community development banks in Brazil: Private or common goods? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4S), 116S–133S.Google Scholar
  46. Ingham, G. (2004). The nature of money. Cambridge: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Joachain, H., & Klopfert, F. (2014). Smarter than metering? Coupling smart meters and complementary currencies to reinforce the motivation of households for energy savings. Ecological Economics, 105, 89–96.Google Scholar
  48. Kennedy, M., Lietaer, B. A., & Rogers, J. (2012). People money: The promise of regional currencies. Devon: Triarchy Press Limited.Google Scholar
  49. Kent, D., & Dacin, T. (2013). Bankers at the gate: Microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 759–763.Google Scholar
  50. Klein, N. (2001). Reclaiming the commons. New Left Review, 9, 81–89.Google Scholar
  51. Lagoarde-Segot, T., & Paranque, B. (2017). Sustainability and the reconstruction of academic finance. Research in International Business and Finance, 39(B), 657–662.Google Scholar
  52. Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.Google Scholar
  53. Lietaer, B. A. (2001). The future of money: Creating new wealth, work and a wiser world. London: Random House Business.Google Scholar
  54. Lietaer, B. A., Arnsperger, C., Goerner, S., & Brunnhuber, S. (2012). Money and sustainability: The Missing Link. Report from the Club of Rome. Devon: Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  55. Lohmann, R. A. (2016). The Ostroms’ commons revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4S), 27S–42S.Google Scholar
  56. Louche, C., Arenas, D., & van Cranenburgh, K. C. (2012). From preaching to investing: Attitudes of religious organisations towards responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 301–320.Google Scholar
  57. Marshall, A. P., & O’Neill, D. W. (2018). The Bristol Pound: A tool for localisation? Ecological Economics, 146, 273–281.Google Scholar
  58. Martí, I. (2018). Transformational business models, grand challenges, and social impact. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3824-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martignoni, J. (2012). A new approach to a typology of complementary currencies. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 16, A1–A17.Google Scholar
  60. Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.Google Scholar
  61. Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “Community of Persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.Google Scholar
  62. Melo, J., & Braz, J. (2013). Banco Palmas – Resistindo e Inovando. São Paulo: A9 Editora.Google Scholar
  63. Meyer, C. (2012). Les finances solidaires comme biens communs durables: étude de cas de la Banque communautaire de développement Palmas (Brésil). Bruxelles: Université libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  64. Meyer, C., & Hudon, M. (2017). Alternative organizations in finance: Commoning in complementary currencies. Organization, 24(5), 629–647.Google Scholar
  65. Michel, A., & Hudon, M. (2015). Community currencies and sustainable development: A systematic review. Ecological Economics, 116, 160–171.Google Scholar
  66. Motta, W., Dini, P., & Sartori, L. (2017). Self-funded social impact investment: An interdisciplinary analysis of the Sardex mutual credit system. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 149–164.Google Scholar
  67. North, P. (2014a). Ten square miles surrounded by reality? Materialising alternative economies using local currencies. Antipode, 46(1), 246–265.Google Scholar
  68. North, P. (2014b). Complementary currencies. In M. Parker, G. Cheney, V. Fournier & C. Land (Eds.), The Routledge companion to alternative organization (pp. 182–194). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Nyssens, M., & Petrella, F. (2015). ESS et Ressources Communes: Vers la Reconnaissance d’une Diversité Institutionnelle. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 15(1), 117–134.Google Scholar
  70. O’Brien, T. (2009). Reconsidering the common good in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
  71. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Paranque, B. (2016). La Finance comme Commun: Un Idéal-Type pour des Emancipations. Revue de la Régulation. Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://regulation.revues.org/12031.
  73. Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.Google Scholar
  74. Périlleux, A., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Understanding cooperative finance as a new commons. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(2), 155–177.Google Scholar
  75. Saiag, H. (2013). Le Trueque Argentin ou la Question du Fédéralisme Monétaire (1995–2002). Revue Française de Socio-Economie, 12(2), 69–89.Google Scholar
  76. Sanz, E. (2016). Community currency (CCs) in Spain: An empirical study of their social effects. Ecological Economics, 121, 20–27.Google Scholar
  77. Sartori, L., & Dini, P. (2016). From complementary currency to institution: A micro–macro study of the Sardex mutual credit system. Stato e Mercato, 36(2), 273–304.Google Scholar
  78. Servet, J. M. (2013). Monnaie: Quand la Dette occulte le Partage. Revue Française de Socio-Economie, 12(2), 125–147.Google Scholar
  79. Servet, J. M. (2015). La Finance et la Monnaie comme un «Commun». Paris: Institut Veblen pour les Réformes Economiques.Google Scholar
  80. Seyfang, G. (2002). Tackling social exclusion with community currencies: Learning from LETS to time banks. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
  81. Seyfang, G. (2004). Time banks: Rewarding community self-help in the inner city? Community Development Journal, 39(1), 62–71.Google Scholar
  82. Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Growing green money? Mapping community currencies for sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 86, 65–77.Google Scholar
  83. Shermin, V. (2017). Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strategic Change, 26(5), 499–509.Google Scholar
  84. Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian–Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.Google Scholar
  85. Sison, A. J. G., Hartman, E. M., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). Guest editors’ introduction reviving tradition: Virtue and the common good in business and management. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 207–210.Google Scholar
  86. Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.Google Scholar
  87. Stodder, J. (2009). Complementary credit networks and macroeconomic stability: Switzerland’s Wirtschaftsring. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1), 79–95.Google Scholar
  88. Tedmanson, D., Essers, C., Dey, P., & Verduyn, K. (2015). An uncommon wealth… transforming the commons with purpose, for people and not for profit! Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 439–444.Google Scholar
  89. Tirole, J. (2017). Economics for the common good. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Vallet, G. (2015). Le WIR en Suisse: la révolte du puissant? Revue de la régulation. Retrieved octobre 7, 2017, from http://regulation.revues.org/11463.
  91. Vallet, G. (2016). A local money to stabilize capitalism: The underestimated case of the WIR. Economy and Society, 45(3–4), 479–504.Google Scholar
  92. Velde, F. (2013). Bitcoins: A primer. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Essays on Issues: 317, December.Google Scholar
  93. Weber, B. (2014). Bitcoin and the legitimacy crisis of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(1), 17–41.Google Scholar
  94. Yermack, D. (2014). Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic NBER Working Paper No. 19747. NBER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Victoria, Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, Centre for Social and Sustainable InnovationVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.CEBBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Centre for European Research in Microfinance (CERMi)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations