Abstract
This article analyses the ethics of how community engagement and dialogue as applied by a mining corporation in Chile led to erosion of the community’s psychological freedom despite being aligned with best practice. This article details how a mining company squeezed the psychological freedom of the community in order to obtain an agreement between the period of 2000 and 2016. The findings focus particularly on a 9-month period between 2015 and 2016 when the company undertook intense community engagement. The article identifies six corporate action phases undertaken which curtailed the community’s psychological freedom as paying off local leaders; challenging via courts of law; co-opting community lawyers; prohibiting a key debate during dialogue; and remaining silent after failing to honour its own self-imposed rule. The findings label the company’s community engagement as contradictory; while it conducted transitional and transformational engagement (in line with best practice) in formal spaces, it also engaged in unethical strategies in the informal spaces of community engagement. The result was overall community consent and an even more fragmented community. This article finds that when it limits the psychological freedom of participants, who are already divided as a group, corporate–community engagement (CCE) can be viewed as ethically problematic. Based on analysis of the literature and an empirical case analysis, this article contributes a test for assessing the ethics of CCE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to a senior management official during an interview with the author.
References
Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders, and colonial discourses the case of the Jabiluka Uranium Mine. Organization & Environment, 13(1), 3–38.
Banerjee, S. B. (2017). Transnational power and translocal governance: The politics of corporate responsibility. Human Relations, 0018726717726586
Bebbington, A., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Bury, J., Lingan, J., Muñoz, J. P., & Scurrah, M. (2008). Mining and social movements: Struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World Development, 36(12), 2888–2905.
Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. (2010). Consolidado de solicitudes, aclaraciones, ampliaciones y rectificaciones al Estudio de Impacto Ambiental del “Proyecto Integral de Desarrollo” de Minera Los Pelambres. RRNN_AAL_E_PS_20100817_RT_PM_RB_EG_FG_MSL_Informe. Accessed 13 July 2017.
Boutilier, R. G., & Thomson, I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Social Licence. https://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2017.
Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 297–318.
Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: Selected essays. New York: Humanity Books
Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.
Colegio Médico. (2018). http://www.colegiomedico.cl/?page_id=368. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
Coleman, L. M. (2013). The making of docile dissent: Neoliberalization and resistance in Colombia and beyond. International Political Sociology, 7(2), 170–187.
Collins, D. (2009). The failure of a socially responsive gold mining MNC in El Salvador: Ramifications of NGO mistrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 245–268.
Consejo Minero. (2018). Encuesta Consejo Minero: Licencia social supera a los temas agua y energía. http://dev.consejominero.cl/encuesta-consejo-minero-licencia-social-supera-a-los-temas-agua-y-energia/. Accessed 20 Mar 2018.
Ehrnström-Fuentes, M. (2016). Delinking legitimacies: A pluriversal perspective on political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 433–462.
Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas). (2016). Retrieved March 19, from http://www.ejatlas.org.
Escobar, A. (2006). Difference and conflict in the struggle over natural resources: A political ecology framework. Development, 49(3), 6–13.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Franks, D. M., Davis, R., Bebbington, A. J., Ali, S. H., Kemp, D., & Scurrah, M. (2014). Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7576–7581.
Fujimoto, Y., Azmat, F., & Subramaniam, N. (2016). Creating community-inclusive organizations: Managerial accountability framework. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316680060.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren III, H. J. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organisation–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 425–438.
Herbertson, K., Ballesteros, A. R., Goodland, R., & Munilla, I. (2009). Breaking ground: Engaging communities in extractive and infrastructure projects (p. 3). World Resources Institute.
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2010). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Random House.
Horowitz, L. S. (2015). Culturally articulated neoliberalisation: Corporate social responsibility and the capture of indigenous legitimacy in New Caledonia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(1), 88–101.
ICMM. (2015). Good practice guide indigenous peoples and mining. London.
Imbun, B. (2007). Cannot manage without the ‘significant other’: Mining, corporate social responsibility and local communities in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 177–192.
Interamerican Development Bank. (2017). Meaningful stakeholder engagement, IDB series on environmental and social risk and opportunity. https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/8454/Meaningful-Stakeholder-Consultation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
International Finance Corporation. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: A good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/publications_handbook_stakeholderengagement__wci__1319577185063.
Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: Conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11, 23–34.
Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 271–284.
Johannesen, R. L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57(4), 373–382.
Kapelus, P. (2002). Mining, corporate social responsibility and the “community”: The case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 275–296.
Keller, P. W., & Brown, C. T. (1968). An interpersonal ethic for communication. Journal of Communication, 18(1), 73–81.
Kemp, D., Owen, J. R., Gotzmann, N., & Bond, C. J. (2011). Just relations and company–community conflict in mining. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 93–109.
Kraemer, R., Whiteman, G., & Banerjee, B. (2013). Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: The importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 823–852.
Li, F. (2016). Defense of water: Modern mining, grassroots movements, and corporate strategies in Peru. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 21, 109–129
Martens, W., van der Linden, B., & Wörsdörfer, M. (2017). How to assess the democratic qualities of a multi-stakeholder initiative from a Habermasian perspective? Deliberative democracy and the equator principles framework. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3532-4.
Mena, S., de Leede, M., Baumann, D., Black, N., Lindeman, S., & McShane, L. (2010). Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 161–188.
Murphree, D. W., Wright, S. A., & Ebaugh, H. R. (1996). Toxic waste siting and community resistance: How cooptation of local citizen opposition failed. Sociological Perspectives, 39(4), 447–463.
Murphy, M., & Vives, J. (2013). Perceptions of justice and the human rights protect, respect, and remedy framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 781–797.
Muthuri, J. N., Moon, J., & Idemudia, U. (2012). Corporate innovation and sustainable community development in developing countries. Business & Society, 51(3), 355–381.
Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. (2011). A global mining corporation and local communities in the Lake Victoria zone: The case of Barrick Gold multinational in Tanzania. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 253–282.
O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2013). Community development agreements in the mining industry: An emerging global phenomenon. Community Development, 44(2), 222–238.
O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2015). Social equity and large mining projects: Voluntary industry initiatives, public regulation and community development agreements. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 91–103.
OLCA. (2004). Cronología del Conflicto. http://www.olca.cl/oca/chile/region04/mlp/olca_mlp/informes/informes_pdf/informe_II.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2017.
Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., Battaglia, M., & Frey, M. (2017). When Democratic Principles are not Enough: Tensions and Temporalities of Dialogic Stakeholder Engagement. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3500-z.
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357.
PWC. (2013). Retrieved September 25, 2016 from http://www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/mining/publications/assets/pwc-mine-aconfidence-crisis.pdf.
Reed, D. (2002). Resource extraction industries in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 199–226.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edn.). London: Sage.
Stückelberger, C. (2009). Dialogue ethics: Ethical criteria and conditions for a successful dialogue between companies and societal actors. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 329.
Szablowski, D. (2002). Mining, displacement and the World Bank: A case analysis of compania minera antamina’s operations in Peru. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 247–273.
Urkidi, L., & Walter, M. (2011). Dimensions of environmental justice in anti-gold mining movements in Latin America. Geoforum, 42(6), 683–695.
Van Buren III, H. J. (2001). Corporate citizenship and obligations of fairness. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(3), 55–67.
Wheeler, D., Fabig, H., & Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 297–318.
World Bank. (2016). World bank extractives sector overview. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/extractiveindustries/overview#1.
Zandvliet, L., & Anderson, M. (2009). Getting it right: Making corporate–community relations work. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Funding
This study was partly funded by Fondecyt - Chilean National fund for scientific and technological development. Project No. 3160824 as well as in part by H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Project: 707485.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Video Documentaries
Asemblea inicial (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHtC6n67yGY (102 min).
Caimanes: Stolen Water (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-C0WoKV_pg (60 min).
Continentes-Caimanes, una condena a muerte (2017). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6mKot-zSGg (25 min).
Chile se Moviliza-Caimanes (2013). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-3azQ1nkGg (61 min).
La lucha de Caimanes La Izquierda Diario Chile (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFN7KKt0MHc.
CAIMANES, el pueblo que se enfrentó al poder de Luksic (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y59o_PMIFOE&t=14s (13 min).
Environmental Hazards in Chile’s Mines (2016). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdOLzB7rouE (9 min).
Minera de Luksic permea estado de derecho en Chile permea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRnBoxt24tw&t=22s (9 min).
La abogada Sandra Dagnino explica la realidad del pueblo de Caimanes (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj8QMhpx90o&t=618s (16 min).
Toma ruta El Mauro oma ruta. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMTKt0ohjmA (8 min).
Websites Consulted
Chile Transparente-Proceso de diálogo, participación y consulta (2015). http://www.chiletransparente.cl/proceso-de-dialogo-participacion-y-consulta-2015/ (accessed 19th July, 2017).
Pelambres Proceso Participativo Caimanes. http://pelambres.samara.cl/comunidad-proceso-participativo-caimanes.html (accessed 23rd July, 2017).
Antofagasta Minerals Sustainability Report (2016). http://www.aminerals.cl/media/5534/antofagasta-minerals_rs16.pdf (accessed 14th March, 2018).
Conflicto en Caimanes: dos miradas distintas sobre el tranque El Mauro (2015). http://www.24horas.cl/nacional/conflicto-en-caimanes-dos-miradas-distintas-sobre-el-tranque-el-mauro-1603876 (accessed 20th July, 2017).
Caimanes: Juez ordena demolición del tranque de la Minera Los Pelambres. http://www.24horas.cl/nacional/caimanes-juez-ordena-demolicion-del-tranque-de-la-minera-los-pelambres-1601623 (accessed 20th July, 2017).
Comunidad de Caimanes rechaza dictamen que anula derrumbe de Tranque El Mauro (2016). http://radio.uchile.cl/2016/08/09/comunidad-de-caimanes-rechaza-dictamen-que-anula-derrumbe-de-tranque-el-mauro/ (accessed 19th July, 2017).
Caimanes gana: Tranque El Mauro debe ser demolido (2015). http://www.eldesconcierto.cl/2015/03/09/caimanes-anota-devastador-fallo-judicial-tranque-el-mauro-debe-ser-demolido-partir-de-manana/ (accessed 20th July, 2017).
Minera del Grupo Luksic llega a un acuerdo con Caimanes y pone fin a una década de conflictos (2016). http://www.elmostrador.cl/mercados/2016/05/18/minera-del-grupo-luksic-llega-a-un-acuerdo-con-caimanes-y-pone-fin-a-una-decada-de-conflictos/ (accessed 20th July, 2017).
Conflicto en Caimanes: Ordenan demolición total del tranque de Minera Los Pelambres (2015). http://www.emol.com/noticias/economia/2015/03/09/707166/juez-ordena-demolicion-total-del-tranque-de-minera-los-pelambres-y-empresa-apelara.html (accessed 21st July, 2017).
What is Antofagasta hiding from its investors? (2016). https://newint.org/blog/2016/05/17/what-is-antofagasta-hiding (accessed 22nd July, 2017).
Acuerdo entre Los Pelambres y Caimanes contempla 3.100 millones para abogados y fondo extra si es que extiende la vida útil del Tranque El Mauro. http://www.theclinic.cl/2016/08/17/acuerdo-entre-los-pelambres-y-caimanes-contempla-3-100-millones-para-abogados-y-posibilidad-de-extender-el-tranque-el-mauro/ (accessed 21st July, 2017).
Comité de Defensa de Caimanes presentó querella criminal contra sus ex abogados por prevaricación. http://www.theclinic.cl/2017/02/13/comite-defensa-caimanes-presento-querella-criminal-ex-abogados-prevaricacion/ (accessed 21st December, 2017).
Corte de Apelaciones de La Serena revoca orden de demolición del tranque de relaves El Mauro. https://web.pelambres.cl/pdfs/Comunicado-fallo-favorable-080816.pdf (accessed 21st July, 2017).
Del conflicto al acuerdo. http://dev.consejominero.cl/caimanes-del-conflicto-al-acuerdo/ (accessed 21st December, 2017).
Colegio Médico presenta recurso a favor de Caimanes por contaminación de agua en la zona. http://radio.uchile.cl/2012/10/19/colegio-medico-de-la-serena-presenta-recurso-a-favor-de-caimanes-por-contaminacion-de-agua/ (accessed 21st July, 2017).
http://www.colegiomedico.cl/?page_id=368 (accessed 21st December, 2017).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maher, R. Squeezing Psychological Freedom in Corporate–Community Engagement. J Bus Ethics 160, 1047–1066 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3898-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3898-y