The Presence of Ethics Codes and Employees’ Internal Locus of Control, Social Aversion/Malevolence, and Ethical Judgment of Incivility: A Study of Smaller Organizations
Workplace incivility is a current challenge in organizations, including smaller firms, as is the development of programs that enhance employees’ treatment of coworkers and ethical decision making. Ethics programs in particular might attenuate tendencies toward interpersonal misconduct, which can harm ethical reasoning. Consequently, this study evaluated the relationships among the presence of ethics codes and employees’ locus of control, social aversion/malevolence, and ethical judgments of incivility using information secured from a sample of businesspersons employed in smaller organizations (N = 189). Results indicated that ethics code presence was associated with a more internal locus of control and stronger ethical judgment of workplace incivility. Social aversion/malevolence was negatively related to ethical judgment, and internal locus of control was positively related to ethical judgment. Smaller firms should develop ethics codes to manage individuals’ perceptions of control, thus encouraging enhanced ethical reasoning in situations that involve the mistreatment of coworkers; they should also monitor counterproductive tendencies that harm such reasoning and precipitate incivility.
KeywordsEthics codes Dark Triad Locus of control Ethical decision making
The authors wish to thank O.C. Ferrell and Eric Arnould for their assistance with the questionnaire and Lynn Godkin for his assistance collecting the data in the convenience sample.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Participation in this self-report attitude survey was voluntary; participants were only encouraged to complete the questionnaire (“Please complete this ‘sales relations survey’” was used as introductory text in the questionnaire); anonymity and confidentiality were ensured on the questionnaire (“Confidential when completed—You will remain anonymous” was included as descriptive text in the questionnaire).
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gok, K., Sumanth, J. J., Bommer, W. H., Demirtas, O., Arslan, A., Eberhard, J., Ozdemir, A. I., & Yigit, A. (2017). You may reap what you sow: How employees’ moral awareness minimizes ethical leadership’s positive impact on workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3655-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (1989). Ethics in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
- Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., Petty, J. W., Palich, L. E., & McKinney, J. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Longenecker, J. G., & Schoen, J. E. (1975). The essence of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 16(3), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Miller, D., De Vries, M. F. R. K., & Toulouse, J. M. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 237–253.Google Scholar
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Rhodewalt, F., & Peterson, B. (2009). Narcissism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 547–560). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schonlau, M., Ronald, D. Jr., & Elliott, M. N. (2002). Conducting research surveys via email and the web (Appendix C). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- Stevens, B. (2009). Corporate ethical codes as strategic documents: An analysis of success and failure. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 14(2), 14–20.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2011). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (5th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations: Social scientific perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Valentine, S., & Barnett, T. (2003). Ethics code awareness, perceived ethical values, and organizational commitment. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23(4), 359–367.Google Scholar
- Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2017). From schoolyard to workplace: The impact of bullying on sales and business employees’ Machiavellianism, job satisfaction, and perceived importance of an ethical issue. Human Resource Management, 57, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valentine, S., Fleischman, G., & Godkin, L. (2018). Villains, victims, and verisimilitudes: An exploratory study of unethical corporate values, bullying experiences, psychopathy, and selling professionals’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2993-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wotruba, T. R. (1990). A comprehensive framework for the analysis of ethical behavior, with a focus on Sales Organizations. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 10, 29–42.Google Scholar