Advertisement

When Guilt is Not Enough: Interdependent Self-Construal as Moderator of the Relationship Between Guilt and Ethical Consumption in a Confucian Context

  • Yanyan Chen
  • Dirk C. Moosmayer
Original Paper

Abstract

Guilt appeals have been found effective in stimulating ethical consumption behaviors in western cultures. However, studies performed in Confucian cultural contexts have found contradictory results. We aim to investigate the inconclusive results of research on guilt and ethical consumption and to explain the inconsistencies. We aim to better understand the influence of guilt on ethical consumption in a Chinese Confucian context and to explore the culturally relevant individual-level concept of interdependent self-construal as a moderator. We build our argument on the Confucian ethics of ren-yi-li where the virtue of propriety (li 礼) specifies role-based obligations depending on the proximity of one’s relationship to others and may thus limit ethical behaviors that are directed to those who are relationally distant. We hypothesize a positive relationship between guilt and ethical consumption that is, however, negatively moderated by interdependent self-construal. Put another way, consumers who define themselves strongly through their relationships with close others are less likely to compensate for guilt through ethical consumption. We find the hypothesized model supported in a survey of 314 Chinese consumers. The results suggest that guilt appeals can stimulate ethical consumption in Confucian cultures. However, guilt appeals may not be enough, as the moderating effect suggests that they will be most effective when combined with an ethical consumption initiative that conforms to the Confucian li principle. As this principle implies prioritizing close over distant relationships, it follows that consumers may be more likely to respond to guilt appeals which are linked to ethical consumption initiatives whose beneficiaries they feel connected to.

Keywords

Guilt Ethical consumption Interdependent self-construal Confucianism 

Abbreviations

AVE

Average variance extracted

CFA

Confirmatory factor analysis

CFI

Comparative fit index

C.R.

Composite reliability

CRM

Cause-related marketing

EFA

Exploratory factor analysis

RMSEA

Root-mean-square error of approximation

SEM

Structural equation modeling

TLI

Tucker-Lewis Index

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank section editor Scott Vitell and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and developmental feedback and guidance during the review process. Furthermore, we very much thank Ms. Susannah Davis for contributing to the conceptual argument of this study and for her editing work on the manuscript. Yanyan Chen acknowledges financial support through the University of Nottingham Ningbo China Ph.D. scholarship program.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the authors’ institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research project has been reviewed and was approved according to the ethical review processes in place in the University of Nottingham Ningbo China.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “We” avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonetti, P., & Baines, P. (2015). Guilt in marketing research: An elicitation-consumption framework and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, P. R., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, G. (2009). Cosmopolitanism as hospitality: Revisiting identity and difference in cosmopolitanism. Alternatives, 34(2), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, P. R., Verbeke, W., & Gavino, C. J. (2003). Culture moderates the self-regulation of shame and its effects on performance: The case of salespersons in the Netherlands and the Philippines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballet, J., & Carimentrand, A. (2010). Fair trade and the depersonalization of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2005). Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of ethical consumption. Antipode, 37(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology and Marketing, 25(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bedford, O., & Hwang, K. (2003). Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 33(2), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Block, L. G. (2006). Self-referenced fear and guilt appeals: The moderating role of self-construal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(11), 2290–2309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boudewyns, V., Turner, M., & Paquin, R. (2013). Shame-free guilt appeals: Testing the emotional and cognitive effects of shame and guilt appeals. Psychology and Marketing, 30(9), 811–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bousch, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bronn, S. P., & Vrioni, B. A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnett, M., & Lunsford, D. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Marketing, 11(3), 33–43.Google Scholar
  20. Bush, A., & Hair, J. (1985). An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carfagna, B. L., Dubois, A. E., Fitzmaurice, C., Quimette, Y. M., Schor, B. J., & Willis, M. (2014). An emerging eco-habitus: The reconfiguration of high cultural capital practices among ethical consumers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chan, G. (2008). The relevance and value of Confucianism in contemporary business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang, C. (2011). Guilt appeals in cause-related marketing: The subversive roles of product type and donation magnitude. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang, C., & Chen, T. (2010). Guilt appeals in cause-related advertising: When does a guilt appeal backfire? Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 522–523.Google Scholar
  25. Chatzidakis, A. (2015). Guilt and ethical choice in consumption: A psychoanalytic perspective. Marketing Theory, 15(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheng, C. (2011). A transformative conception of Confucian ethics: The Yijing, utility and rights. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheung, C., & Chan, A. (2005). Philosophical foundations of eminent Hong Kong Chinese CEO’s leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chuang, Y., Xie, X., & Liu, C. (2016). Interdependent orientations increase pro-environmental preferences when facing self-interest conflicts: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cotte, J., Coulter, R., & Moore, M. (2005). Enhancing or disrupting guilt: the role of credibility and perceived manipulative Intent. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cotte, J., & Trudel, R. (2009). Socially conscious consumerism: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. London: Network for Business Sustainability.Google Scholar
  33. Coulter, R. H., & Pinto, B. M. (1995). Guilt appeal in advertising: What are their effects? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cross, S. E. (1995). Self-construals, coping, and stress in cross-cultural adaptation. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 26(6), 673–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dahl, D. W., Honea, H., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: Relationship, reciprocity, reparation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer hardback with DVD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Du, X. (2015). Does confucianism reduce minority shareholder expropriation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 661–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Elliott, R. (2013). The taste for green: the possibilities and dynamic of status differentiation through “green” consumption. Poetics, 41(3), 294–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  44. Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228–241.Google Scholar
  45. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Gill, J. D., Grossbart, S., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Influence of involvement, commitment and familiarity on brand beliefs and attitudes of viewers exposed to alternative ad claim strategies. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). How do consumers infer corporate social responsibility? The role of organisation size. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(4), 282–293.Google Scholar
  49. Griskevicius, V., Van den Bergh, B., & Tybur, J. M. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology and Marketing, 24(8), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huhmann, B., & Brotherton, T. (1997). A content analysis of guilt appeals in popular magazine advertisements. The Journal of Advertising, 16(2), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(Spring), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(December), 1–11.Google Scholar
  56. Hwang, K., & Kim, H. (2016). Are ethical consumers happy? Effects of ethical consumers’ motivation based on empathy versus self-orientation on their happiness. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3236-1.Google Scholar
  57. Hwang, K. K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Katchadourian, A. H. (2010). Guilt: A bite of conscience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kim, J., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2013). The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koehn, D., & Leung, A. S. M. (2004). Western and Asian business ethics. In K. Leung & S. White (Eds.), Handbook of Asian Management (pp. 265–292). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kubany, E. S., & Watson, S. B. (2003). Guilt: Elaboration of a multidimensional model. Psychological Record, 53(1), 51–90.Google Scholar
  63. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Landreth-Grau, S. I., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflict: Highly guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lu, L. (2013). The effects of consumer ethics and anticipated guilt on ethical intention. 環境與管理研究 Journal of Environment and Management, 13(2), 37–51.Google Scholar
  67. Lwin, M., & Phau, I. (2014). An exploratory study of existential guilt appeals in charitable advertisements. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13–14), 1467–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mencius, (1963). Mencius. London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moosmayer, D. C., Chen, Y., & Davis, S. M. (2017). Deeds not words: A cosmopolitan perspective on the influences of corporate sustainability and NGO engagement on the adoption of sustainable products in China. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3702-4.Google Scholar
  73. Moosmayer, D. C., & Davis, S. M. (2016). Staking cosmopolitanism claims: How firms and NGOs talk about supply chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moosmayer, D. C., & Fuljahn, A. (2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Muller, C. (1991) The doctrine of the mean. http://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/docofmean.html.
  76. Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(June), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nuyen, A. T. (2009). Moral obligation and moral motivation in Confucian role-based ethics. Dao, 8(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. O’Keefe, D. (2000). Guilt and social influence. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 23 (pp. 67–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., & Antonides, G. (2014). Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Paek, H., & Nelson, R. M. (2009). To buy or not to buy: Determinants of socially responsible consumer behavior and consumer reactions to cause-related and boycotting ads. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(2), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Romar, E. J. (2002). Virtue is good business: Confucianism as a practical business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5(3), 161–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). The approach and avoidance function of personal and vicarious shame and guilt. Motivation and Emotion, 30(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletins, 20(5), 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sison, A. J. G., & Ferrero, I. (2015). How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(S2), S78–S98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2013). Emotions and dissonance in “ethical” consumption choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11–12), 1201–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Soscia, I. (2007). Gratitude, delight, or guilt: The role of consumers’ emotions in predicting postconsumption behaviours. Psychology & Marketing, 24(10), 871–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Steenhaut, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2006). The mediating role of anticipated guilt in consumers’ ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Subrahmanyan, S. (2004). Effects of price premium and product type on the choice of cause-related brands: A Singapore perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(2), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sung, Y., Choi, S. M., & Tinkham, S. F. (2012). Brand-situation congruity: The roles of self-construal and brand commitment. Psychology & Marketing, 29(12), 941–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tangney, J. P. (1990). Assessing individual differences in proneness to shame and guilt: Development of the self-conscious affect and attribution inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tangney, J. P., Dearing, R. L., Wagner, P. E., & Gramzow, R. H. (2000). The test of self-conscious affect–3 (TOSCA-3). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  102. Tangney, J. P., Mashek, D., & Stuewig, J. (2005). Shame, guilt, and embarrassment: Will the real emotion please stand up? Psychological Inquiry, 16(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  103. Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1256–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). Two faces of shame: The roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychology Science, 25(3), 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Theotokis, A., & Manganari, E. (2015). The impact of choice architecture on sustainable consumer behavior: The role of guilt. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tiwald, J. (2011). Dai Zhen’s defense of self-interest. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wagner, U., Wicklund, R. A., & Shaigan, S. (1990). Open devaluation and rejection of a fellow student: The impact of threat to a self-definition. Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology, 11(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(S3), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wang, J., & Wu, L. (2016). The impact of emotions of the intention of sustainable consumption choices: Evidence from a big city in an emerging country. Journal of Cleaner Production., 126, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology, 2(2), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wiltermuth, S. S., & Cohen, T. R. (2014). “I’d only let you down”: Guilt proneness and the avoidance of harmful interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 925–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Xu, H., Begue, L., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Washing the guilt away: Effects of personal versus vicarious cleansing on guilty feelings and prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 97.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00097.Google Scholar
  115. Yang, D., Lu, Y., Zhu, W., & Su, C. (2015). Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2663–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yau, A., & Davies, I. (2015). The modern renegotiations of Confucian ethics and implications on ethical consumption in china. In L. Robinson Jr. (Ed.), Marketing dynamism & sustainability: Things change, things stay the same (pp. 212–221). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  117. Zhu, Y. (2015). The role of qing (positive emotions) and li (rationality) in Chinese entrepreneurial decision making: A Confucian ren-yi wisdom perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toulouse Business School, University of Toulouse31068 TOULOUSE Cedex 7France
  2. 2.Nottingham University Business School ChinaNingboChina

Personalised recommendations