Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 152, Issue 4, pp 917–929 | Cite as

On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance

  • Kevin J. JohnsonEmail author
  • Joé T. Martineau
  • Saouré Kouamé
  • Gokhan Turgut
  • Serge Poisson-de-Haro
Original Paper

Abstract

In order to make strategic decisions and improve their firm’s performance, top management teams must have information on the competitive context in general, and the firm’s competitors in particular. During the decision-making process, top managers can have access to “privileged information”—i.e., information of a confidential and potentially strategic nature that could ultimately confer a decisional advantage over competing parties. However, obtaining and using privileged information in a business context is often illegal—and if not, is usually deemed unethical or “against the rules.” Using a quasi-experimental design, this study explores the reasons why an individual might engage in such unethical behavior. We assess the extent to which managers use privileged information with respect to perceived team cohesion and peers’ ethicality. More specifically, our results show that the use of privileged information is predicted by the decision-maker’s perceptions of their team cohesion and their peers’ ethicality. Moreover, we find that team performance, as a group-level nonself-reported factor (measured by the firm’s share price in our simulation), moderates the relationship between cohesion and the use of privileged information. The relationship between cohesion, ethical behavior, and team performance is also discussed. We draw on these findings to make some practical suggestions on how to incorporate practices that could better prevent the unethical use of privileged information in strategic decision-making processes.

Keywords

Cohesion Unethical behavior Strategic decision-making Top management team Firm performance Simulation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abdolmohammadi, M., & Sultan, J. (2002). Ethical reasoning and the use of insider information in stock trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2005). Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: Insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, C., Albrecht, C., Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2009). Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 887–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.Google Scholar
  6. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  8. Banerjee, D., Cronan, T. P., & Jones, T. W. (1998). Modeling IT ethics: A study in situational ethics. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.Google Scholar
  12. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boone, C., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2005). Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, S. (2010). The role of ethical leadership versus institutional constraints: A simulation study of financial misreporting by CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2003). Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1500 articles published in journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 138–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duncan, R. B. (1974). Modifications in decision structure in adapting to the environment: Some implications for organizational learning. Decision Sciences, 5(4), 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ensleva, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Espinosa, J. A., & Clark, M. A. (2013). Team knowledge representation: A network perspective. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(2), 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festinger, L., Back, K. W., & Schachter, S. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Flynn, F. J., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2010). Who’s with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1074–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hambrick, D. C. (1982). Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
  40. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt, T. G., & Jennings, D. F. (1997). Ethics and performance: A simulation analysis of team decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  43. Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kish-Dephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 326–338.Google Scholar
  46. Kunc, M. H., & Morecroft, J. D. (2010). Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1164–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lamberg, J. A., Tikkanen, H., Nokelainen, T., & Suur-Inkeroinen, H. (2009). Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leland, H. E. (1992). Insider trading: Should it be prohibited? Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lemke, D. K., & Schminke, M. (1991). Ethics in declining organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(3), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ma, Y., & Huey-Lian, S. (1998). Where should the line be drawn on insider trading ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Manne, H. G. (1966). Insider trading and the stock market. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  53. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin, D. W., & Peterson, J. H. (1991). Insider trading revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mathieu, J. E., & Schulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R., D'Innocenzo, L., & Reilly, G. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesionperformance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 713–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGee, R. W. (2008). Applying ethics to insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meulbroek, L. A. (1992). An empirical analysis of illegal insider trading. Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1661–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller, D. (2003). An asymmetry-based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moore, J. (1990). What is really unethical about insider trading? Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nag, R., & Gioia, D. A. (2012). From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specific use of knowledge as a resource. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 421–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Narayanan, J., Ronson, S., & Pillutla, M. (2006). Groups as enablers of unethical behavior: The role of cohesion on group member actions. In A. E. Tenbrunsel (Ed.), Ethics in groups: Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 8, pp. 127–147). Emerald Group Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ntayi, J. M., Byabashaija, W., Eyaa, S., Ngoma, M., & Muliira, A. (2010). Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officers. Journal of Public Procurement, 10(1), 68–92.Google Scholar
  65. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. O’Hara, P. A. (2001). Insider trading in financial markets: Legality, ethics, efficiency. International Journal of Social Economics, 28(10–12), 1046–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Petrick, J. A., & Quinn, J. F. (2000). The integrity capacity construct and moral progress in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations–development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in strategic management journal: 1996–2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruiz-Palomino, P., Martínez-Cañas, R., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Ethical culture and employee outcomes: The mediating role of person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1996). A systems view of the firm in competence-based competition. In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon.Google Scholar
  74. Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 3). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  75. Schnatterly, K. (2003). Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227–239.Google Scholar
  77. Simon, H. A. (1938). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  78. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sinclair, A. (1993). Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thomas, T., Schermerhorn, J. R., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56–66.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  84. Trevino, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69–81.Google Scholar
  85. Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Trevino, L. K., & Victor, B. (1992). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 38–64.Google Scholar
  87. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Werhane, P. H. (1989). The ethics of insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 841–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wiltermuth, S. S., Bennett, V. M., & Pierce, L. (2013). Doing as they would do: How the perceived ethical preferences of third-party beneficiaries impact ethical decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation and Gaming, 28(4), 360–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wolfe, J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1998). Teaching business ethics with management and marketing games. Simulation and Gaming, 29(1), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wolfe, J., & Rogé, J. N. (1997). Computerized general management games as strategic management learning environments. Simulation and Gaming, 28(4), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin J. Johnson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joé T. Martineau
    • 1
  • Saouré Kouamé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gokhan Turgut
    • 1
  • Serge Poisson-de-Haro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementHEC MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations