Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?

Abstract

Corruption continues to represent a tenacious challenge to internationally active companies. According to prevailing international anti-corruption standards, a company can be held criminally liable if it does not put all necessary and reasonable organizational measures in place to prevent corruption. The regular training of employees is considered one of the most effective ways to prevent corruption. Employee training is considered helpful in efforts to minimize the risk of employees becoming involved in corrupt behavior. With this idea in mind and building on the fraud triangle model and neutralization theory, this paper examines whether business professionals who have undergone anti-corruption training are more likely to reject prevailing justifications of corrupt practices than are those who have not undergone such training. The empirical analysis in this paper is based on regression models using data obtained from a unique dataset that includes 200 business professionals. The findings provide evidence that training is positively linked to the likelihood of rejecting justifications of corruption. However, the research also suggests that methods of training must become more specific in order to tackle challenging questions regarding the gray areas of ethics and compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Adam, A. M., & Rachman-Moore, D. (2004). The methods used to implement an ethical code of conduct and employee attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1774-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. C. (2008). Current trends in fraud and its detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 17(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393550801934331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez, K., Salas, Eduardo, & Garofano, Christina M. (2004). An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304270820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2005). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executives, 19(4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.13837437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Argandoña, A. (1997). The 1996 ICC report on extortion and bribery in international business transactions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 6(3), 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Argandoña, A. (2005). Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0133-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organisations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azar, O. H. (2003). The implications of tipping for economics and management. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(10), 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290310492878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bannenberg, B. (2002). Korruption in Deutschland und ihre strafrechtliche Kontrolle: Eine kriminologisch-strafrechtliche Analyse (Polizei + Forschung, Vol. 18). Neuwied: Luchterhand.

  11. Becker, K., Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Fostering management education to deter corruption: What do students know about corruption and its legal consequences? Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9448-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bierstaker, J. L., Albrecht, C., Turnbull, C., Zhang, Y., & Skousen, C. J. (2010). The relationship between South Korean chaebols and fraud. Management Research Review, 33(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011030408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. E. (2010). Ethics instruction and the perceived acceptability of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0345-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bryane, M. (2005). Anti-corruption training programmes in central and eastern Europe. Strassbourg: Council of Europe Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman, J. W. (2006). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Conlin, M., Lynn, M., & O’Donoghue, T. (2003). The norm of restaurant tipping. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00030-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Copes, H. (2014). Techniques of neutralization. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (pp. 867–871, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.

  18. Copes, H., & Cardwell, S. M. (2014). Accounts theory. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminilogy (pp. 1–4, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.

  19. Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cromwell, P., & Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/713840271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9617-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The Evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fointiat, V. (1998). Rationalization in act and problematic behaviour justification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 471–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<471::AID-EJSP876>3.0.CO;2-C.

  25. Fritsche, I. (2005). Predicting deviant behavior by neutralization: Myths and findings. Deviant Behavior, 26(5), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290968489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gentile, M. C. (2017). Giving Voice To Values: A global partnership with UNGC PRME to transform management education. The International Journal of Management Education., 15(2B), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilman, S. C., & Stout, Jeffrey. (2008). Assessment strategies and practices for integrity and anti-corruption measures: A comparative overview. In B. Head, A. J. Brown, & C. Connors (Eds.), Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions (Law, ethics and governance). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gordon, K., & Miyake, M. (2001). Business approaches to combating bribery: A study of codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012517622479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hauser, C., & Hogenacker, J. (2014). Do firms proactively take measures to prevent corruption in their international operations? European Management Review, 11(3–4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Neue Märkte, neue Risiken: Empirische Evidenz zum Korruptionsrisiko für den international aktiven Mittelstand. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 83(SI 4), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04092-5_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hauser, C., & Nieffer, R. (2018). Korruptionsprävention mittels eines computerbasierten Planspiels. In P. Graf & S. Wolf (Eds.), Korruption und Korruptionsbekämpfung : Die Vermittlung in Lehre , Unterricht und Weiterbildung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., & Velury, K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hooker, J. (2009). Corruption from a cross-cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang, S. Y., Lin, C.-C., Chiu, A.-A., & Yen, D. C. (2016). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. IBA, OECD, & UNODC. (2010). Risks and threats of corruption and the legal profession: Survey 2010. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/46137847.pdf.

  38. Jonson, E. P., McGuire, L., & Cooper, B. (2016). Does teaching ethics do any good? Education + Training, 58(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2015-0110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unraveling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9998-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaptein, M. (2015). The effectiveness of ethics programs: The role of scope, composition, and sequence. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2296-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Köbis, N. C., van Prooijen, J.-W., Righetti, F., Lange, Van, & Paul, A. M. (2015). “Who doesn’t?” The impact of descriptive norms on corruption. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0131830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lau, C. L. L. (2010). A step forward: Ethics Education matters! Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0173-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin, I. Y., & Namasivayam, K. (2011). Understanding restaurant tipping systems: a human resources perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(7), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111167533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Maesschalck, J., & de Schrijver, A. (2016). Researching and improving the effectiveness of ethics training. In A. Lawton (Ed.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 198–212). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32(1), 221–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/655355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1860-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9854-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2014). The impact of authority on reporting behavior. Rationalization and Affect. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McKercher, B., Weber, K., & Du Cros, H. (2008). Rationalising inappropriate behaviour at contested sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(4), 369. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost778.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (2008). International bribery: Does a written code of ethics make a difference in perceptions of business professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1–2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9395-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Miller, W. L., Grødeland, Å. B., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0741-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nuijten, M., & Anders, G. (2007). Corruption and the secret of law: A legal anthropological perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pacini, C., Swingen, J. A., & Rogers, H. (2002). The role of the OECD and EU Conventions in combating bribery of foreign public officials. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015235806969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Palmer, D. E., & Zakhem, A. (2001). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Using the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines as a paradigm for ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006471731947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2006). Rebounding from corruption: Perceptions of ethics program effectiveness in a public sector organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9027-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pfister, J. (2009). The individual level. In J. Pfister (Ed.), Managing organizational culture for effective internal control (pp. 145–158, Contributions to Management Science). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.

  61. Rabl, T. (2012). Do contextual factors matter? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 82(S6), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-012-0629-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations: Development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2009). Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001). Virtuelle Seminare in Hochschule und Weiterbildung: Drei Beispiele aus der Praxis. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Röhrich, R. (2008). Fraud-Management als Prävention von Haftungsrisiken. In R. Röhrich (Ed.), Methoden der Korruptionsbekämpfung: Risiken erkennen—Schäden vermeiden. Berlin: Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2004). Governance and corruption. In B. Lomborg & J. J. Myers (Eds.), Global crises, global solutions (pp. 301–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Routley, L. (2013). Negotiating corruption: NGOs, governance and hybridity in West Africa (Interventions). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ruiz, P., Martinez, R., Rodrigo, J., & Diaz, C. (2015). Level of coherence among ethics program components and its impact on ethical intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2064-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2013). The fraud triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business ethics: A textbook with cases (9th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Smallridge, J. L., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Crime specific neutralizations: An empirical examination of four types of digital piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Gift giving, bribery and corruption: Ethical management of business relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005960026519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross-section of Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Thorne LeClair, D., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Innovation in experiential innovation in experiential business ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006266526120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Transparency International. (2015). Exporting Corruption Report. Progress Report 2015: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Foreign Bribery. Berlin.

  81. Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Berlin.

  82. Trevino, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2004). Ethics training and businesspersons' perceptions of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5591-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. van Montfort, A., Beck, L., & Twijnstra, A. (2013). Can integrity be taught in public organizations? Public Integrity, 15(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Velasquez, M. (2004). Is corruption always corrupt? In G. G. Brenkert (Ed.), Corporate integrity & accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Verma, P., Mohapatra, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2016). Ethics training in the Indian IT sector: Formal, informal or both? Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2331-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9875-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Warren, D. E., Gaspar, J. P., & Laufer, W. S. (2014). Is formal ethics training merely cosmetic? A study of ethics training and ethical organizational culture. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(1), 85–117. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Watson, D. M. (2003). Cultural dynamics of corporate fraud. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600310797522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: A review, assessment, and recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wells, J. T. (2017). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  92. West, J. P., & Berman, E. M. (2004). Ethics training in U.S. cities: Content, pedagogy, and impact. Public Integrity, 6(3), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Whaley, J. E., Douglas, A. C., & O’Neill, M. A. (2014). What’s in a tip? The creation and refinement of a restaurant-tipping motivations scale: A consumer perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2016). Toward a theory of second-order corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615579914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Fleming, P. J., & Rothenberg, S. (2009). Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(Suppl 1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9685-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Much of this paper was written while I was a visiting scholar at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management and Bentley University’s Hoffman Center for Business Ethics. I would like to thank both schools for their generous hospitality, as well as Marta Geletkanycz, W. Michael Hoffman, Sandra Waddock, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions and comments on earlier versions of the paper. I am grateful to Jens Hogenacker and Martin Messingschlager for their econometric assistance as well as to colleagues at HTW Chur and University of Siegen for their contribution and input into the development of the underlying research project. Funding from the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

Funding

This study was co-funded by Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Hauser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Christian Hauser declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Christian Hauser is Professor of Business Economics and International Management at the University of Applied Sciences HTW Chur, Switzerland. He is a member of the topical platform Ethics of the Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences (SATW), member of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) Working Group on Anti-Corruption and head of the first PRME Business Integrity Action Center in Europe. His research interests include international entrepreneurship, SME and private sector development, corporate responsibility and business integrity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauser, C. Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?. J Bus Ethics 159, 281–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3808-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Internationalization
  • Corruption
  • Corruption prevention
  • Business ethics
  • Ethics training

JEL Classification

  • D73
  • L22
  • M14
  • M16
  • M53