…“a gentleman seeks virtue, a small man seeks land. A gentleman seeks justice, a small man seeks favours…” (The Analects: Confucius 2014: Chap. 4.11)
Abstract
As conventionally understood, corruption relies on a set of universally agreed rules that determine what constitutes the appropriate allocation of organizational resources. This article explores whether rule-based approaches to corruption are applicable where business organizations, such as public private partnerships (PPPs), and the public fundamentally disagree about what constitutes an appropriate allocation of resources. Drawing on empirical research about PPPs in Vietnam, this article compares how government, business organizations, and the public conceptualize the transfer of public assets into private ownership. It argues that a public interest approach to corruption is needed where PPPs privatize public assets within the law, but against the express wishes of the public.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang, Y. Y. (2016). Beyond weber: Conceptualizing an alternative ideal type of bureaucracy in developing contexts. Regulation and Governance, 11(3), 282–298.
Ashforth, E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.
Baum, J. R. (2011). Responsive democracy: Increasing state accountability in East Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2006). Responsive regulation and developing economies. World Development, 34, 884–898.
Breit, E. (2010). On the (re)construction of corruption in the media: A critical discursive approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 619–635.
Bui, T. H. (2016). The influence of social media in Vietnam’s elite politics. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(2), 89–112.
CECODES, VFF-CRT, RTA and UNDP. (2018). The 2017 Viet Nam governance and public administration performance index: Measuring citizens’ experiences. Hanoi: United Nations Development Programme.
Chen, C., & Hubbard, M. (2012). Power relations and risk allocation in the governance of public private partnerships: A case study from China. Policy and Society, 31(1), 39–49.
Đặng, H. V. (2013). Hồi đáp của GS Đặng Hùng Võ về khúc mắc quanh dự án Văn Giang. [Response by Professor Dang Hung Vo on changes to the Van Giang project]. Retrieved 1 January, 2012, from http://www.tinmoi.vn/hoi-dap-cua-gs-dang-hung-vo-ve-khuc-mac-quanh-du-an-van-giang-011164280.html.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Đoan, T. & Thanh, N. (2012). Vụ thu hồi đất ở Văn Giang (Hưng Yên) - Bài 3: Tìm một cơ chế hài hòa quyền lợi. [Land acquisition in Van Giang (Hung Yen)—Lesson 3: Finding a harmonious mechanism of interests]. Phap Luat. Retrieved 9 May, 2012, from http://toquoc.vn/gio-thu-25/vu-thu-hoi-dat-o-van-giang-hung-yen-bai-3-tim-mot-co-che-hai-hoa-quyen-loi-107397.html.
Dumas, L., Wedel, J., & Callman, G. (2010). Confronting corruption, building accountability: Lessons from the world of international development advising. New York: Palgrave.
Gillespie, J. (2011). Exploring the limits of judicial review in urban land disputes in Vietnam. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 241–275.
Gillespie, J. (2017). Transforming land-taking disputes in socialist Asia: Engaging an authoritarian state. Law & Policy, 39(3), 280–303.
Gillespie, J., & Nguyen, H. Q. (2018). Between authoritarian governance and urban citizenship: Tree-felling protests in Hanoi. Urban Studies, 55, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018784865.
Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50.
Granovetter, M. (2007). The social construction of corruption. In R. Swedberg & V. Nee (Eds.), On capitalism (pp. 152–172). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Harms, E. (2011). Saigon’s edge: On the margins of Ho Chi Minh City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hayllar, M., & Wettenhall, R. (2010). Public-private partnerships: Promises, politics and pitfalls. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(1S), 1–7.
He, B. (2006). Participatory and deliberative institutions in China. In E. J. Leib & B. He (Eds.), The search for deliberative democracy in China (pp. 175–196). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoàng Thư, (2012). Vụ thu hồi đất ở Văn Giang (Hưng Yên). [Land reclamation in Van Giang (Hung Yen)]. Phap Luat. Retrieved 5 May, 2012, from http://toquoc.vn/gio-thu-25/vu-thu-hoi-dat-o-van-giang-hung-yen-bai-3-tim-mot-co-che-hai-hoa-quyen-loi-107397.html.
Johnston, J. (2016). Public relations and the public interest. New York: Routledge.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kornberger, M., & Brown, A. D. (2007). ‘Ethics’ as a discursive resource for identity work. Human Relations, 60(3), 497–518.
Lê Hiếu (2010). Về Vấn Đề Chuyển Đổi Mục Đích Sử Dụng Đất Nông Nghiệp trong Quá Trình Công Nghiệp Hoá, Đô Thị Hoá. [In the matter of the conversion of agricultural land use for industrialization and urbanization]. Tạp Chi Quản Lý Nhà Nước, 174(7), 34–38.
Lebbe, D., & Musil, C. (2013). Peri-urban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1146–1161.
Lofland, J. (1995). Analytic ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 30–67.
Malarney, S. K. (1997). Culture, virtue, and political transformation in contemporary Northern Viet Nam. Journal of Asian Studies, 56(4), 899–920.
Minzner, C. (2011). China’s turn against law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59, 935–984.
Nguyễn, L. (2012). Thấy gì qua vụ cưỡng chế tại Văn Giang, Hưng Yên. [What can we see from the state-led forceful eviction in Van Giang, Hung Yen]. Tạp Chí Mặt Trận 105 (July) http://mattran.org.vn/home/TapChi/so%20105/ncdp.htm.
Nguyễn, H. (2012). Lãnh đạo Hưng Yên báo cáo về vụ cưỡng chế ở Văn Giang. [Hung Yen leader reported the case in Van Giang]. Tin Moi. Retrieved 2 May, 2012, from http://www.tinmoi.vn/lanh-dao-hung-yen-bao-cao-ve-vu-cuong-che-o-van-giang-01876399.html.
Nuijten, M., & Anders, G. G. (Eds.). (2007). Corruption and the secret of law: a legal anthropological perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Nye, J. (2002). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. In A. Heidenheimer & M. Johnson (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (3rd edn., pp. 281–300). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
OECD (2012). Recommendations of the Council for principles of good governance for public-private partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/governance/oecd-recommendation-public-privatepartnerships.htm.
Owens, T., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 477–499.
Oxfam (2013). Luật đất đai: Một góc nhìn khác từ Tổ chức Oxfam. [Land law: Another view from Oxfam]. Retrieved 2 July, 2013, from https://batdongsan.com.vn/phan-tich-nhan-dinh/luat-dat-dai-mot-goc-nhin-khac-tu-to-chuc-oxfam-ar49117.
Painter, M. L., Dao, T., Hoang, M. C., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2012). International comparative analysis of anti-corruption legislation: Lessons on sanctioning and enforcement mechanisms for Viet Nam. Public Administration Reform and Anti-corruption, Policy Discussion Papers. United Nations Development Programme, Hanoi, Vietnam.
PAPI (2016). Public administration perception index. UNDP, Hanoi. Retrieved from http://papi.org.vn/eng/.
PCI (2016). Provincial competitive index. Vietnam, Hanoi. Retrieved from http://eng.pcivietnam.org.
Polanyi, K. (2001) [1944], The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our times. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2012). Firm-level corruption in Vietnam. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 60(3), 571–595.
Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples: With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences and reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sikor, T., Dorondel, S., Stahl, J., & To, P. X. (2017). When things become property: Land reform, authority and value in Postsocialist Europe and Asia. New York: Berghahn Books.
Suchmann, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Tang, B. (2015). Deliberating governance in Chinese urban communities. The China Journal, 73, 84–107.
The Analects: Confucius. (2014). S. Ley trans. and M. Nyland Ed., Norton Critical Edition. New York: Norton.
Tyler, T. (2006). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Princeton University Press.
van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verdery, K. (2003). The vanishing hectare: Property and value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
VLA and UNDP (2016). 2015 justice index: Towards a justice system for the people. Hanoi: UNDP.
Wedel, J. (2012). Rethinking corruption in an age of ambiguity. Annual Review of Social Science, 8, 453–498.
Wells-Dang, A. (2012). Civil society networks in China and Vietnam: Informal Pathbreakers in health and the environment. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
World Bank, Embassy of Denmark in Vietnam, Embassy of Sweden in Vietnam (2011). Recognizing and reducing corruption risks in land management in Vietnam. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.
World Bank. (2011). Vietnam urbanization review. Hanoi: World Bank.
World Bank. (2013). Improving land sector governance in Vietnam. Research report. Hanoi: World Bank.
Zaloznaya, M. (2013). Beyond anti-corruptionism: Sociological imagination and comparative study of corruption. Comparative Sociology, 12, 705–751.
Zaloznaya, M. (2014). The social psychology of corruption: Why it does not exist and why it should. Sociology Compass, 8(2), 187–202.
Zhou, W. (2012). In search of deliberative democracy in China. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1), 4–16.
Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2017). Weapons of the powerful: authoritarian elite competition and politicized anticorruption in China. Comparative Political Studies, 50(9), 1186–1220.
Funding
This study was funded by a research grant in 2016 from the United Nations Development Program, Vietnam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the researchers’ institution, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillespie, J., Van Nguyen, T., Nguyen, H.V. et al. Exploring a Public Interest Definition of Corruption: Public Private Partnerships in Socialist Asia. J Bus Ethics 165, 579–594 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04101-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04101-8