Are “Bad” Employees Happier Under Bad Bosses? Differing Effects of Abusive Supervision on Low and High Primary Psychopathy Employees

  • Charlice HurstEmail author
  • Lauren Simon
  • Yongsuhk Jung
  • Dante Pirouz
Original Paper


Psychopathy is typically seen as a trait that is undesirable in any context, including the workplace. But several authors have suggested that people high in psychopathy might possess resources that preserve their ability to perform well in stressful contexts. We consider the possibility that primary psychopathy is adaptive—for the employee, if not for the organization—under conditions of abusive supervision. In particular, we draw from the multimotive model of interpersonal threat (Smart Richman and Leary in Psychol Rev 116:365–383, 2009) and the theory of purposeful work behavior (Barrick et al. in Acad Manag Rev 38:132–153, 2013) to argue that high primary psychopathy individuals possess characteristics that enable them to experience higher levels of well-being and lower levels of anger than their peers under abusive supervisors. Based on a scenario study and a time-lagged field study, we found support for a model in which abusive supervision moderates the relationships between primary psychopathy and positive work-related outcomes (positive affect and engagement), such that these relationships are positive under conditions of abusive supervision and either diminished or negative under conditions of low abusive supervision. Abusive supervision also affected the relationship between primary psychopathy and anger in the field study such that high primary psychopathy individuals were less angry under more abusive supervisors. Thus, there appears to be some credence to the notion of a “psychopathic advantage” in that primary psychopaths do have access to greater psychological resources than their peers under abusive supervision. However, these findings also suggest that abusive supervisors may empower employees with characteristics that hold strong potential to damage the organization and its stakeholders.


Psychopathy Abusive supervision Affect 



This study was funded by the Ian O. Ihnatowycz Institute for Leadership at Ivey Business School, Western University, Canada.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, N. L., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). Understanding everyday psychopathy: Shared group identity leads to increased concern for others among undergraduates higher in psychopathy. Social Cognition, 30, 564–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashkanasy, N., & Dorris, A. (2017). Emotions in the Workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Scholar
  4. Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology, 44, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  6. Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 174–193.Google Scholar
  7. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Baysinger, M. A., Scherer, K. T., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). Exploring the disruptive effects of psychopathy and aggression on group processes and group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Psychopathy, startle blink modulation, and electrodermal reactivity in twin men. Psychophysiology, 42, 753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackburn, R. (1975). An empirical classification of psychopathic personality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blair, R. J. R., Mitchell, D. G., Richell, R. A., Kelly, S., Leonard, A., Newman, C., et al. (2002). Turning a deaf ear to fear: Impaired recognition of vocal affect in psychopathic individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 682–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blickle, G., & Schütte, N. (2017). Trait psychopathy, task performance, and counterproductive work behavior directed toward the organization. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boddy, C. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiaburu, D. S., Muñoz, G. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2013). How to spot a careerist early on: Psychopathy and exchange ideology as predictors of careerism. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christopoulos, G. I., Uy, M. A., & Yap, W. J. (2016). The body and the brain measuring skin conductance responses to understand the emotional experience. Organizational Research Methods. Scholar
  19. Clarke, J. (2002). Working with monsters. Australia: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
  21. Comiteau, L. (2014). When the boss is a psychopath. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  22. Coyne, S. M., & Thomas, T. J. (2008). Psychopathy, aggression, and cheating behavior: A test of the Cheater-Hawk hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1105–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deresiewicz, W. (2012). Capitalists and other psychopaths. The New York Times. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  24. Dindo, L., & Fowles, D. (2011). Dual temperamental risk factors for psychopathic personality: Evidence from self-report and skin conductance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dutton, K. (2012). The wisdom of psychopaths. Canada: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Edens, J. F., Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G., Jr. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falkenbach, D., Poythress, N., & Creevy, C. (2008). The exploration of subclinical psychopathic subtypes and the relationship with types of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 821–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fragale, A. R., Overbeck, J. R., & Neale, M. A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgements based on targets’ power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 767–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furnham, A. (2015). Backstabbers and bullies. New York: Bloomsbury Information Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. Furnham, A. (2016). Psychopaths at work: How do you recognize and deal with psychopathic work colleagues? Psychology Today. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  31. Gervais, M. M., Kline, M., Ludmer, M., George, R., & Manson, J. H. (2013). The strategy of psychopathy: primary psychopathic traits predict defection on low-value relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare, R. D. (1978). Psychopathy and electrodermal responses to nonsignal stimulation. Biological Psychology, 6, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  34. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hicks, B. M., & Patrick, C. J. (2006). Psychopathy and negative emotionality: Analyses of suppressor effects reveal distinct relations with emotional distress, fearfulness, and anger-hostility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoobler, J. M., & Hu, J. (2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 256–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection and team configuration. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 332–355). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the Five-Factor Model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: The symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.Google Scholar
  46. Le, H., Oh, I. S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty-Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the US presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychological assessment inventory-revised (PPIR). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  52. Lipman, V. (2013). The disturbing link between psychopathy and leadership. Available at Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  53. Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology, 55, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Marsh, A. A., & Cardinale, E. M. (2012a). Psychopathy and fear: Specific impairments in judging behaviors that frighten others. Emotion, 12, 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marsh, A. A., & Cardinale, E. M. (2012b). When psychopathy impairs moral judgments: Neural responses during judgments about causing fear. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marshall, A. J., Ashleigh, M. J., Baden, D. B., Ojiako, U., & Guidi, M. G. D. (2015). Corporate psychopathy: Can ‘search and destroy’ and ‘hearts and minds’ military metaphors inspire HRM solutions? Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mathieu, C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the 5-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morgenson, G. (2013). It’s one mistake for another here. The New York Times. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  61. Namie, G. (2012). The WBI website 2012- H instant poll: Workplace bullying perpetrators’ rank & numbers. Workplace Bullying Institute. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  62. Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 787–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1088–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Poythress, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., Skeem, J. L., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., Epstein, M., et al. (2010). Using the PCL-R to help estimate the validity of two self-report measures of psychopathy with offenders. Assessment, 17, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Preacher, K. (2003). A primer on interaction effects in multiple linear regression. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  73. Protess, B. (2012). House report says Corzine’s risky bets aided MF Global’s fall. The New York Times. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  74. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ray, J. V., Hall, J., Rivera-Hudson, N., Poythress, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Morano, M. (2013). The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reidy, D. E., Shelley-Tremblay, J. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathy, reactive aggression, and precarious proclamations: A review of behavioral, cognitive, and biological research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 512–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rilling, J. K., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Pagnoni, G., Goldsmith, D. R., Elfenbein, H. A., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1260–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ross, S. R., & Rausch, M. K. (2001). Psychopathic attributes and achievement dispositions in a college sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rupp, D. E., & Spencer, S. (2006). When customers lash out: The effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 971–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schütte, N., Blickle, G., Frieder, R. E., Wihler, A., Schnitzler, F., Heupel, J., et al. (2015). The role of interpersonal influence in counterbalancing psychopathic personality trait facets at work. Journal of Management. Scholar
  85. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2009). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simon, L. S., Hurst, C., Kelley, K., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Understanding cycles of abuse: A multimotive approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1798–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smith, S. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Psychopathy in the workplace: The knowns and unknowns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smith, S. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., Coffey, K., & Dabbs, J. M. (2013). Are psychopaths and heroes twigs off the same branch? Evidence from college, community, and presidential samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 634–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Steinberger, M. (2004). Psychopathic C.E.O.’s. The New York Times. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  92. Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). May 2012 national occupational employment and wage estimates United States. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  95. Verona, E., Patrick, C. J., Curtin, J. J., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Psychopathy and physiological response to emotionally evocative sounds. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vitale, J. E., Brinkley, C. A., Hiatt, K. D., & Newman, J. P. (2007). Abnormal selective attention in psychopathic female offenders. Neuropsychology, 21, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Voigt, K. (2012). Bad bosses: The psycho-path to success? CNN International. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  98. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2012). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five-factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wilson, M. S., & McCarthy, K. (2011). Greed is good? Student disciplinary choice and self-reported psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 873–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlice Hurst
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lauren Simon
    • 2
  • Yongsuhk Jung
    • 3
  • Dante Pirouz
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.University of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  3. 3.Korea Air Force AcademyCheongjuKorea
  4. 4.Western UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations