Are “Bad” Employees Happier Under Bad Bosses? Differing Effects of Abusive Supervision on Low and High Primary Psychopathy Employees
Psychopathy is typically seen as a trait that is undesirable in any context, including the workplace. But several authors have suggested that people high in psychopathy might possess resources that preserve their ability to perform well in stressful contexts. We consider the possibility that primary psychopathy is adaptive—for the employee, if not for the organization—under conditions of abusive supervision. In particular, we draw from the multimotive model of interpersonal threat (Smart Richman and Leary in Psychol Rev 116:365–383, 2009) and the theory of purposeful work behavior (Barrick et al. in Acad Manag Rev 38:132–153, 2013) to argue that high primary psychopathy individuals possess characteristics that enable them to experience higher levels of well-being and lower levels of anger than their peers under abusive supervisors. Based on a scenario study and a time-lagged field study, we found support for a model in which abusive supervision moderates the relationships between primary psychopathy and positive work-related outcomes (positive affect and engagement), such that these relationships are positive under conditions of abusive supervision and either diminished or negative under conditions of low abusive supervision. Abusive supervision also affected the relationship between primary psychopathy and anger in the field study such that high primary psychopathy individuals were less angry under more abusive supervisors. Thus, there appears to be some credence to the notion of a “psychopathic advantage” in that primary psychopaths do have access to greater psychological resources than their peers under abusive supervision. However, these findings also suggest that abusive supervisors may empower employees with characteristics that hold strong potential to damage the organization and its stakeholders.
KeywordsPsychopathy Abusive supervision Affect
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ashkanasy, N., & Dorris, A. (2017). Emotions in the Workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113231.Google Scholar
- Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 174–193.Google Scholar
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, J. (2002). Working with monsters. Australia: Random House.Google Scholar
- Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
- Comiteau, L. (2014). When the boss is a psychopath. BBC.com. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140306-do-you-work-for-a-tyrant. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Deresiewicz, W. (2012). Capitalists and other psychopaths. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/opinion/sunday/fables-of-wealth.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Dutton, K. (2012). The wisdom of psychopaths. Canada: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Furnham, A. (2015). Backstabbers and bullies. New York: Bloomsbury Information Ltd.Google Scholar
- Furnham, A. (2016). Psychopaths at work: How do you recognize and deal with psychopathic work colleagues? Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201601/psychopaths-work. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection and team configuration. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 332–355). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the Five-Factor Model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: The symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.Google Scholar
- Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the US presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychological assessment inventory-revised (PPIR). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Lipman, V. (2013). The disturbing link between psychopathy and leadership. Forbes.com. Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2013/04/25/the-disturbing-link-between-psychopathy-and-leadership/#71091b222740. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Morgenson, G. (2013). It’s one mistake for another here. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/business/senate-report-shows-anxious-moments-for-jpmorgan-traders.html?ref=morganjpchaseandcompany. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Namie, G. (2012). The WBI website 2012- H instant poll: Workplace bullying perpetrators’ rank & numbers. Workplace Bullying Institute. Retrieved from http://www.workplacebullying.org/multi/pdf/WBI-2012-IP-H.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Preacher, K. (2003). A primer on interaction effects in multiple linear regression. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org/interact/interactions.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Protess, B. (2012). House report says Corzine’s risky bets aided MF Global’s fall. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/congressional-report-blames-corzine-for-mf-globals-collapse/?ref=jonscorzine. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Steinberger, M. (2004). Psychopathic C.E.O.’s. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12PSYCHO.html?_r=0. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). May 2012 national occupational employment and wage estimates United States. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/2012/may/oes_nat.htm#00-0000. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
- Voigt, K. (2012). Bad bosses: The psycho-path to success? CNN International. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/19/business/psychopath-boss. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.