Skip to main content
Log in

What’s in a Surname? The Effect of Auditor-CEO Surname Sharing on Financial Misstatement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”.

“Romeo and Juliet” by W. William Shakespeare.

Abstract

This study examines the influence of auditor-CEO surname sharing (ACSS) on financial misstatement and further investigates whether the above effect depends on hometown relationship and the rarity of surnames, respectively. Using hand-collected data from China, the findings show that ACSS is significantly positively related to financial misstatement, suggesting that the auditor-CEO ancestry membership elicits the collusion and increases the likelihood of financial misstatement. Moreover, ACSS based upon hometown relationship leads to significantly higher likelihood of financial misstatement, compared with ACSS without hometown relationship. Furthermore, the positive relation between ACSS and financial misstatement is more pronounced for rare surnames than for common surnames. The above findings are robust to sensitivity tests on the basis of different measures of ACSS and financial misstatement, and my conclusions are still valid after using the propensity score matching approach to address the endogeneity concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Auditor–client relation refers to the cases in which former audit partners of an accounting firm serve as a client firm's senior directors or top managers. The data on auditor–client relation can be obtained by checking the resumes of senior directors or top managers, which are provided in China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database.

  2. In most Asian countries such as China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam and several European and Latin American countries, one's surname is placed before his/her given name. However, in most Western countries, one's surname is accustomed to being placed after his/her given name (Doll 1992). It is common that a person has the sole surname, but a Spaniard or Portuguese may own two or more surnames. (In rare cases, people do not have to have a surname.)

  3. In China, at least two auditors (three auditors in some cases) are required to sign their full names in the client's audited financial statements. One of them is known as the engagement (field) auditor, and the other is the review auditor.

  4. As a result, the vast majority of Chinese people in contemporary society—both men and women, before marriage and after marriage—do not change their surnames (Bai and Kung 2014).

  5. In a guanxi-based society, individual behavior is shaped by interpersonal relationship, and thus, some transactions depend on personal agreements and private information, rather than formal contracts (Li 2003). As a comparison, a rule-based society emphasizes publicly verifiable information and the contractual spirit.

  6. As a comparison, in most countries, researchers cannot obtain individual auditor-specific data such as names and other demographic features of the signing auditors or audit partners. To the best of my knowledge, data on individual auditors can be obtained only in few countries or regions such as mainland China, Chinese Taiwan, and Australia.

  7. In European countries, surnames are associated with a medieval naming movement, which aimed at coping with some situations in which several people had an identical name.

  8. According to the social identity theory, “categorization” implies that people classify themselves into a group based on some common features and "identification" means that people consider themselves to have common characteristics of a given group (Tajfel 1970).

  9. Please note that results using 70 and 80% as thresholds of the cumulative percentage are qualitatively similar to those using 75% as the threshold. In addition, please note that there are very few firm-year observations for ACSS_RARE if we adopt stricter thresholds.

  10. Sample period begins from 2006 because the data of school ties and hometown relation can be obtained from 2006.

  11. Liu et al. (2012) identify the measure of isonymy, proxied by the surname proximity across different provinces in China. Directors on corporate boards are likely to be chosen locally (Knyazeva et al. 2009, 2013), so surname proximity can embody the isonymy in an area where a client firm is located. The same can be applied to audit firms.

  12. The matching range of ± 0.01 is chosen in order to retain as many treated firm-year observations as possible, or else it will lead to lose too many treated firms as unmatchable. As a matter of fact, ± 0.01 is a generally accepted standard for the propensity score matching process (Dehejia and Wahba 2002).

  13. That is, one treated firm is deleted because it cannot be matched. If the caliper is tightened (e.g., ± 0.005), results remain qualitatively similar to those using a range of ± 0.01, although the number of the treated firms varies accordingly.

References

  • Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3), 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. M. (2010). What is in a surname? The role of ethnicity in economic decision making. Applied Economics, 42(21), 2715–2723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, Z. (1988). Archaeological research on neolithic China. Current Anthropology, 29(5), 753–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, M., & Thoursie, P. S. (2009). Renouncing personal names: an empirical examination of surname change and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2013). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autry, J. W., & Barker, D. G. (1970). Academic correlates of alphabetical order of surname. Journal of School Psychology, 8(1), 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, W. R., Krishnan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Investor perceptions of the earnings quality consequences of hiring an affiliated auditor. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 69–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., & Kung, K. S. (2014). Does genetic distance have a barrier effect on technology diffusion? Evidence from historical China. Working paper, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

  • Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, V. M., Pierce, L., Snyder, J. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Science, 59(8), 1725–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situations: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, H. B., Fang, M. L., & Xu, X. (2011). Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. Journal of Law and Economic, 54(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, H., & Liu, Q. (2009). Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Economic Journal, 119(537), 764–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. (1997). Corporate culture of a clan organization. Management Decision, 35(2), 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. H., & Wong, T. J. (2007). Auditors’ governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 13–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, A. G. H., Du, X., & Jiang, G. (2011). Buy, lie, or die: An investigation of Chinese ST firms’ voluntary interim audit motive and auditor independence. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., & Cummins, N. (2013). Intergenerational mobility in England (1858–2012): Wealth, surnames, and social mobility. Economic history working papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260386608.

  • Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2008). The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116(5), 951–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, A., Stokes, D. J., & Laughton, J. (2002). Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2007). The quest for meaning: A guide to semiotic theory and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dao, M., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2012). Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees, and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L. E. (1981a). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L. E. (1981b). Auditor independence, low-balling and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M. L., Wong, T. J., & Li, S. (2000). The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(3), 269–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, C. B. (1992). Harmonizing filial and parental rights in names: Progress, pitfalls, and constitutional problems. Howard Law Journal, 35, 227–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. (2015). Does Confucianism reduce minority shareholder expropriation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 661–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. (2017). Does CEO-auditor dialect sharing impair pre-IPO audit quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3571-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Du, Y., Zeng, Q., Pei, H., & Chang, Y. (2016). Religious atmosphere, law enforcement, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 229–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Jian, W., Lai, S., Du, Y., & Pei, H. (2015). Does religion mitigate earnings management? evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 699–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, R., & Yuan, Y. (1993). On the evolution of Chinese surnames and the frequency of surnames in different dialectal regions. Social Science in China (in Chinese), 14(4), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, R., Yuan, Y., Hwang, J., Mountain, J., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1992). Chinese surnames and the genetic differences between north and south China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 5, 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, R. A. (1993). Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 887–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efferin, S., & Hopper, T. (2007). Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese Indonesian company. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(3), 223–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einav, L., & Yariv, L. (2006). What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China. Beijing: The Economic Science Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. (2006). From the soil—the foundations of Chinese society. Shanghai: Shanghai People′s Publishing House. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., Shi, J., Wang, Y., & Xu, R. (2017). Social ties and favoritism in Chinese science. Nber working papers.

  • Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 71–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Trust and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1087–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 238–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, J., & Allesina, S. (2017). Last name analysis of mobility, gender imbalance, and nepotism across academic systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(29), 7600–7605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Y., Su, L. N., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2016). Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 506–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güell, M., Rodríguez Mora, S., & Telmer, C. (2014). Intergenerational mobility and the informational content of surnames. Working paper. http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2014/dt-2014-01.pdf.

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993–2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Pittman, J., & Rui, O. (2016). Reputational implications for partners after a major audit failure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Pittman, J., Rui, O. M., & Wu, D. (2017). Do social ties between external auditors and audit committee members affect audit quality? The Accounting Review., 92(5), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2003). What is culture? A reply to Baskerville. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7–8), 811–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, O. K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yong, K. Y. (2008). Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(5), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, B.-H., & Kim, S. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B. J. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic tie in Chinese political alliance: Ganqing and Guanxi (Kan-Ching and Kuan-His) in a Rural Taiwanese Township. China Quarterly, 78, 237–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. B. (1982). The concept of guanxi and local politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. In: S. Greenblatt, R. Wilson, and A. Wilson (eds.), Social Interaction in Chinese Society.  New York: Praeger Publisher, 209–236.

  • Jiang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2010). The structure of fellow concepts and the development of questionnaire. Psychological Research, 3(4), 63–69. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Silberg, J. L., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1991). The family history method: Whose psychiatric history is measured? American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(11), 1501–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2005). Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific Region. Business and Society, 44(2), 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissin, I., & Bradley, E. L. (2013). A surname-based patent-related indicator: The contribution of Jewish inventors to U.S patents. Scientometrics, 97(2), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2009). Local director talent and board composition. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443523.

  • Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFraniere S. (2009). Name not on our list? Change it, China says. The New York Times (April 20). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/world/asia/21china.html.

  • Lennox, C. (2005). Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliations with CPA firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 201–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, C. S., & Park, C. W. (2007). Audit firm appointments, audit firm alumni, and audit committee independence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 114, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. S. (2003). Relation-based versus rule-based governance: An explanation of the East Asian miracle and Asian crisis. Review of International Economics, 11(4), 651–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2012). Blue book of the rule of law: Report on the development of China's rule of law (in Chinese). Beijing, China: Social Sciences Literature Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Chen, L., Yuan, Y., & Chen, J. (2012). A study of surnames in china through isonymy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148(3), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manni, F., Heeringa, W., Toupance, B., & Nerbonne, J. (2008). Do surname differences mirror dialect variation? Human Biology, 80(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, K., & Williams, D. D. (2004). Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1095–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiker, V., & Sharma, D. S. (2009). Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D.-B. (2012). Does the Rolodex matter? Corporate elite’s small world and the effectiveness of boards of directors. Management Science, 58(2), 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotroski, J. D., & Wong, T. J. (2012). Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms. In: National Bureau of Economic Research​ (eds), Capitalizing China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 201–242.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013). Improving the transparency of audits: Proposed amendments to PCAOB auditing standards to provide disclosure in the auditor’s report of certain participants in the audit, PCAOB release no. 2013-009; PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter no. 29, December 4, 2013.

  • Renneboog, L., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Us knows us in the UK: On director networks and CEO compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1132–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C., Mcmillan-Capehart, A., Bhuian, S. N., & Taylor, E. C. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: Does organizational culture really matter? Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 818–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, C. (1981). Chinese clanship in the Philippine setting. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 12(1), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? American Economic Review, 94(2), 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, Y. L., & Walker, A. (2013). Explaining guanxi: the Chinese business network. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tadelis, S. (1999). What’s in a name? Reputation as a tradable asset. American Economic Review, 89(3), 548–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in ingroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., Xiao, J., & Zeng, C. (2015). Colluding with ancestry members. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283547979_Colluding_with_ancestry_members.

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. C. (1989). The everyday use of surname to determine ethnic ancestry. Qualitative Sociology, 12(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, T. (2014). Dictionary of the origin of surnames in the Chinese society. Beijing: Zhong Hua Book Company. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

I highly appreciate constructive comments and informative guidance from Prof. Steven Dellaportas (the Section Editor) and two anonymous reviewers and many valuable suggestions from Shaojuan Lai, Quan Zeng, Hongmei Pei, Fei Hou, Junting Zhou, Hao Xiong, Jingwei Yin, Miaowei Peng, and participants of my presentations at Xiamen University and Anhui University. Prof. Xingqiang Du acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (the approval number: NSFC-71790602; NSFC-71572162), the Key Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science in Ministry of Education (the approval number: 16JJD790032), and the Training Program of Fujian Excellent Talents in University (FETU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingqiang Du.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 9.

Table 9 Variable definitions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, X. What’s in a Surname? The Effect of Auditor-CEO Surname Sharing on Financial Misstatement. J Bus Ethics 158, 849–874 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3762-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3762-5

Keywords

Navigation