“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”.
“Romeo and Juliet” by W. William Shakespeare.
Abstract
This study examines the influence of auditor-CEO surname sharing (ACSS) on financial misstatement and further investigates whether the above effect depends on hometown relationship and the rarity of surnames, respectively. Using hand-collected data from China, the findings show that ACSS is significantly positively related to financial misstatement, suggesting that the auditor-CEO ancestry membership elicits the collusion and increases the likelihood of financial misstatement. Moreover, ACSS based upon hometown relationship leads to significantly higher likelihood of financial misstatement, compared with ACSS without hometown relationship. Furthermore, the positive relation between ACSS and financial misstatement is more pronounced for rare surnames than for common surnames. The above findings are robust to sensitivity tests on the basis of different measures of ACSS and financial misstatement, and my conclusions are still valid after using the propensity score matching approach to address the endogeneity concerns.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Auditor–client relation refers to the cases in which former audit partners of an accounting firm serve as a client firm's senior directors or top managers. The data on auditor–client relation can be obtained by checking the resumes of senior directors or top managers, which are provided in China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database.
In most Asian countries such as China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam and several European and Latin American countries, one's surname is placed before his/her given name. However, in most Western countries, one's surname is accustomed to being placed after his/her given name (Doll 1992). It is common that a person has the sole surname, but a Spaniard or Portuguese may own two or more surnames. (In rare cases, people do not have to have a surname.)
In China, at least two auditors (three auditors in some cases) are required to sign their full names in the client's audited financial statements. One of them is known as the engagement (field) auditor, and the other is the review auditor.
As a result, the vast majority of Chinese people in contemporary society—both men and women, before marriage and after marriage—do not change their surnames (Bai and Kung 2014).
In a guanxi-based society, individual behavior is shaped by interpersonal relationship, and thus, some transactions depend on personal agreements and private information, rather than formal contracts (Li 2003). As a comparison, a rule-based society emphasizes publicly verifiable information and the contractual spirit.
As a comparison, in most countries, researchers cannot obtain individual auditor-specific data such as names and other demographic features of the signing auditors or audit partners. To the best of my knowledge, data on individual auditors can be obtained only in few countries or regions such as mainland China, Chinese Taiwan, and Australia.
In European countries, surnames are associated with a medieval naming movement, which aimed at coping with some situations in which several people had an identical name.
According to the social identity theory, “categorization” implies that people classify themselves into a group based on some common features and "identification" means that people consider themselves to have common characteristics of a given group (Tajfel 1970).
Please note that results using 70 and 80% as thresholds of the cumulative percentage are qualitatively similar to those using 75% as the threshold. In addition, please note that there are very few firm-year observations for ACSS_RARE if we adopt stricter thresholds.
Sample period begins from 2006 because the data of school ties and hometown relation can be obtained from 2006.
Liu et al. (2012) identify the measure of isonymy, proxied by the surname proximity across different provinces in China. Directors on corporate boards are likely to be chosen locally (Knyazeva et al. 2009, 2013), so surname proximity can embody the isonymy in an area where a client firm is located. The same can be applied to audit firms.
The matching range of ± 0.01 is chosen in order to retain as many treated firm-year observations as possible, or else it will lead to lose too many treated firms as unmatchable. As a matter of fact, ± 0.01 is a generally accepted standard for the propensity score matching process (Dehejia and Wahba 2002).
That is, one treated firm is deleted because it cannot be matched. If the caliper is tightened (e.g., ± 0.005), results remain qualitatively similar to those using a range of ± 0.01, although the number of the treated firms varies accordingly.
References
Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3), 324–337.
Ahmed, A. M. (2010). What is in a surname? The role of ethnicity in economic decision making. Applied Economics, 42(21), 2715–2723.
Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.
An, Z. (1988). Archaeological research on neolithic China. Current Anthropology, 29(5), 753–759.
Arai, M., & Thoursie, P. S. (2009). Renouncing personal names: an empirical examination of surname change and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(1), 127–147.
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2013). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
Autry, J. W., & Barker, D. G. (1970). Academic correlates of alphabetical order of surname. Journal of School Psychology, 8(1), 22–23.
Baber, W. R., Krishnan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Investor perceptions of the earnings quality consequences of hiring an affiliated auditor. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 69–102.
Bai, Y., & Kung, K. S. (2014). Does genetic distance have a barrier effect on technology diffusion? Evidence from historical China. Working paper, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–52.
Bennett, V. M., Pierce, L., Snyder, J. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Science, 59(8), 1725–1742.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situations: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.
Cai, H. B., Fang, M. L., & Xu, X. (2011). Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. Journal of Law and Economic, 54(1), 55–78.
Cai, H., & Liu, Q. (2009). Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Economic Journal, 119(537), 764–795.
Chan, A. (1997). Corporate culture of a clan organization. Management Decision, 35(2), 94–99.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 29–35.
Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158.
Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765.
Choi, J. H., & Wong, T. J. (2007). Auditors’ governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 13–46.
Chu, A. G. H., Du, X., & Jiang, G. (2011). Buy, lie, or die: An investigation of Chinese ST firms’ voluntary interim audit motive and auditor independence. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 135–153.
Clark, G., & Cummins, N. (2013). Intergenerational mobility in England (1858–2012): Wealth, surnames, and social mobility. Economic history working papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260386608.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2008). The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116(5), 951–979.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409–1437.
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 77–87.
Craswell, A., Stokes, D. J., & Laughton, J. (2002). Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 253–275.
Danesi, M. (2007). The quest for meaning: A guide to semiotic theory and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Dao, M., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2012). Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees, and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 149–171.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981a). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981b). Auditor independence, low-balling and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(1), 113–127.
DeFond, M. L., Wong, T. J., & Li, S. (2000). The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(3), 269–305.
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
Doll, C. B. (1992). Harmonizing filial and parental rights in names: Progress, pitfalls, and constitutional problems. Howard Law Journal, 35, 227–403.
Du, X. (2015). Does Confucianism reduce minority shareholder expropriation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 661–716.
Du, X. (2017). Does CEO-auditor dialect sharing impair pre-IPO audit quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3571-x.
Du, X., Du, Y., Zeng, Q., Pei, H., & Chang, Y. (2016). Religious atmosphere, law enforcement, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 229–265.
Du, X., Jian, W., Lai, S., Du, Y., & Pei, H. (2015). Does religion mitigate earnings management? evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 699–749.
Du, R., & Yuan, Y. (1993). On the evolution of Chinese surnames and the frequency of surnames in different dialectal regions. Social Science in China (in Chinese), 14(4), 177–190.
Du, R., Yuan, Y., Hwang, J., Mountain, J., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1992). Chinese surnames and the genetic differences between north and south China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 5, 1–93.
Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191–204.
Dye, R. A. (1993). Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 887–914.
Efferin, S., & Hopper, T. (2007). Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese Indonesian company. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(3), 223–262.
Einav, L., & Yariv, L. (2006). What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 175–188.
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China. Beijing: The Economic Science Press. (in Chinese).
Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330–357.
Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35–72.
Fei, X. T. (2006). From the soil—the foundations of Chinese society. Shanghai: Shanghai People′s Publishing House. (in Chinese).
Fisman, R., Shi, J., Wang, Y., & Xu, R. (2017). Social ties and favoritism in Chinese science. Nber working papers.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 71–105.
Garrett, J., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Trust and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1087–1125.
Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 238–262.
Grilli, J., & Allesina, S. (2017). Last name analysis of mobility, gender imbalance, and nepotism across academic systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(29), 7600–7605.
Guan, Y., Su, L. N., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2016). Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 506–525.
Güell, M., Rodríguez Mora, S., & Telmer, C. (2014). Intergenerational mobility and the informational content of surnames. Working paper. http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2014/dt-2014-01.pdf.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 23–48.
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993–2023.
Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.
He, X., Pittman, J., & Rui, O. (2016). Reputational implications for partners after a major audit failure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 703–722.
He, X., Pittman, J., Rui, O. M., & Wu, D. (2017). Do social ties between external auditors and audit committee members affect audit quality? The Accounting Review., 92(5), 61–87.
Hofstede, G. (2003). What is culture? A reply to Baskerville. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7–8), 811–813.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.
Hope, O. K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yong, K. Y. (2008). Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(5), 357–373.
Hwang, B.-H., & Kim, S. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 138–158.
Jacobs, B. J. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic tie in Chinese political alliance: Ganqing and Guanxi (Kan-Ching and Kuan-His) in a Rural Taiwanese Township. China Quarterly, 78, 237–273.
Jacobs, J. B. (1982). The concept of guanxi and local politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. In: S. Greenblatt, R. Wilson, and A. Wilson (eds.), Social Interaction in Chinese Society. New York: Praeger Publisher, 209–236.
Jiang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2010). The structure of fellow concepts and the development of questionnaire. Psychological Research, 3(4), 63–69. (in Chinese).
Kendler, K. S., Silberg, J. L., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1991). The family history method: Whose psychiatric history is measured? American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(11), 1501–1504.
Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2005). Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific Region. Business and Society, 44(2), 178–210.
Kissin, I., & Bradley, E. L. (2013). A surname-based patent-related indicator: The contribution of Jewish inventors to U.S patents. Scientometrics, 97(2), 357–368.
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2009). Local director talent and board composition. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443523.
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561–1605.
LaFraniere S. (2009). Name not on our list? Change it, China says. The New York Times (April 20). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/world/asia/21china.html.
Lennox, C. (2005). Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliations with CPA firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 201–231.
Lennox, C. S., & Park, C. W. (2007). Audit firm appointments, audit firm alumni, and audit committee independence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 235–258.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 114, 139.
Li, J. S. (2003). Relation-based versus rule-based governance: An explanation of the East Asian miracle and Asian crisis. Review of International Economics, 11(4), 651–673.
Li, L. (2012). Blue book of the rule of law: Report on the development of China's rule of law (in Chinese). Beijing, China: Social Sciences Literature Press.
Liu, Y., Chen, L., Yuan, Y., & Chen, J. (2012). A study of surnames in china through isonymy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148(3), 341–350.
Manni, F., Heeringa, W., Toupance, B., & Nerbonne, J. (2008). Do surname differences mirror dialect variation? Human Biology, 80(1), 41–64.
Menon, K., & Williams, D. D. (2004). Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1095–1118.
Naiker, V., & Sharma, D. S. (2009). Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 559–587.
Nguyen, D.-B. (2012). Does the Rolodex matter? Corporate elite’s small world and the effectiveness of boards of directors. Management Science, 58(2), 236–252.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
Piotroski, J. D., & Wong, T. J. (2012). Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (eds), Capitalizing China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 201–242.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013). Improving the transparency of audits: Proposed amendments to PCAOB auditing standards to provide disclosure in the auditor’s report of certain participants in the audit, PCAOB release no. 2013-009; PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter no. 29, December 4, 2013.
Renneboog, L., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Us knows us in the UK: On director networks and CEO compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1132–1157.
Richard, O. C., Mcmillan-Capehart, A., Bhuian, S. N., & Taylor, E. C. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: Does organizational culture really matter? Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 818–825.
See, C. (1981). Chinese clanship in the Philippine setting. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 12(1), 224–247.
Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? American Economic Review, 94(2), 414–418.
Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273–299.
So, Y. L., & Walker, A. (2013). Explaining guanxi: the Chinese business network. London: Routledge.
Tadelis, S. (1999). What’s in a name? Reputation as a tradable asset. American Economic Review, 89(3), 548–563.
Tafel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in ingroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 24–35.
Tan, Y., Xiao, J., & Zeng, C. (2015). Colluding with ancestry members. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283547979_Colluding_with_ancestry_members.
Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265–271.
Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134.
Waters, M. C. (1989). The everyday use of surname to determine ethnic ancestry. Qualitative Sociology, 12(3), 303–324.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.
Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.
Xu, T. (2014). Dictionary of the origin of surnames in the Chinese society. Beijing: Zhong Hua Book Company. (in Chinese).
Funding
I highly appreciate constructive comments and informative guidance from Prof. Steven Dellaportas (the Section Editor) and two anonymous reviewers and many valuable suggestions from Shaojuan Lai, Quan Zeng, Hongmei Pei, Fei Hou, Junting Zhou, Hao Xiong, Jingwei Yin, Miaowei Peng, and participants of my presentations at Xiamen University and Anhui University. Prof. Xingqiang Du acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (the approval number: NSFC-71790602; NSFC-71572162), the Key Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science in Ministry of Education (the approval number: 16JJD790032), and the Training Program of Fujian Excellent Talents in University (FETU).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, X. What’s in a Surname? The Effect of Auditor-CEO Surname Sharing on Financial Misstatement. J Bus Ethics 158, 849–874 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3762-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3762-5