The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions
Entrepreneurs of contested commodities often face stakeholders engaged in market excluding boundary work driven by ethical considerations. For example, the conversion of academic scientific knowledge into technologies that can be owned and sold (i.e., science commercialization) is a growing global trend and key stakeholders have different ethical responses to this contested commodity. Commercialization of science can be viewed as a good thing because people believe it bolsters economic growth and broadly benefits society. Others view it as bad because they believe it discourages basic research that ought to be freely shared without concern for profit. Taking a descriptive sociological approach, we posit that the stance of a religious tradition toward capitalism will help shape individual scientists’ views on science commercialization and test whether the religious tradition of scientists correlates with their attitude toward the commercialization of science. To maximize variance on the religious tradition dimension, we analyze pooled data from a cross-national survey of university biologists and physicists encompassing France, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Taiwan, Turkey, UK and the USA. We indeed find religious tradition differences. Hindus and scientists with no religious tradition are more likely to agree that commercialization of science “harms a university’s commitment to knowledge production” than Protestants. We end with a discussion on business ethics and the moral limits of the market as well as implications for entrepreneurs of contested commodities.
KeywordsAcademic capitalism Contested commodity Religion
Data collection for this paper was funded by the Templeton World Charity Foundation, Religion among Scientists in International Context Study TWCF0033/AB14, Elaine Howard Ecklund PI, Kirstin R. W. Matthews and Steven Lewis, Co-PIs.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bénabou, R., Ticchi, D., & Vindigni, A. (2015a). Forbidden fruits: The political economy of science, religion, and growth. NBER Working Paper 21105. http://wws.princeton.edu/faculty-research/research/item/forbidden-fruits-political-economy-science-religion-and-growth
- Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowie, N. E. (1994). University-business partnerships: An assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, B., & Kauppinen, I. (2014). Academic capitalism in the age of globalization. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Costa, E., & Ramus, T. (2015). Italian Economia Aziendale as a Model Inspired by Catholic Humanism. In D. Melé & M. Schlag (Eds.), Humanism in economics and business: Perspectives of the catholic social tradition (Vol. 43, pp. 147–162). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Das, G. (2002). India unbound: The social and economic revolution from independence to the global information age. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, P. (1994). Culture and economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 27–57). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Firer-Hinze, C. (2007). Bridge discourse on wage justice: Roman Catholic and feminist perspectives on the family living wage. In T. O’Brien & S. Paeth (Eds.), Religious perspectives on business ethics (pp. 295–318). Plymouth: UK Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Geiger, R. L. (1988). Milking the sacred cow: Research and the quest for useful knowledge in the American University Since 1920. Science, Technology and Human Values, 13(3), 332–348.Google Scholar
- Geiger, R. L., & Sa, C. (2009). Tapping the riches of science: Universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hackett, E. J. (1990). Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science. Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 241–279.Google Scholar
- Hayward, D. R., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2007). How competition is viewed across cultures: A test of four theories cross-cultural research, 41(4), 364–395.Google Scholar
- Hesse, C. (2002). The rise of intellectual property, 700 B.C.–A.D. 2000: An idea in the balance. Dædalus, Spring, 26–45.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. R. (2017). A fractured profession: Commercialism and conflict in science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?. Oxford: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Martin, K. E. (2015). Ethical issues in the big data industry big data. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(2), 67–85.Google Scholar
- Melé, D. (2015). Three keys concepts of catholic humanism for economic activity: Human dignity, human rights and integral human development. In D. Melé & M. Schlag (Eds.), Humanism in economics and business: Perspectives of the catholic social tradition (Vol. 43, pp. 113–136). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. L. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57.Google Scholar
- Sait, S., & Lim, H. (2006). Land, law & Islam: Property and human rights in the Muslim world. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Sandel, M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Swedberg, R. (2005). The economic sociology of capitalism: An introduction and agenda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tuchman, G. (2011). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Vogeli, C., Yucel, R., Ben-David, E., Jones, L., Anderson, M., Louis, K., et al. (2006). Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: Results of a national survey. American Medicine, 81(2), 128–136.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. 1905 . The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. 1924 . General economic history (F. H. Knight, Trans.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan Ltd.Google Scholar